The Implementation of INA-CBGs (Indonesia Case-Based Groups) System and Strategic Response in Institutional Theory Perspective (Case Research in RSUD Dr. Saiful Anwar Malang)

Citrus Clarias, Eko G Sukoharsono, Aji D Mulawarman

Abstract


This research aimed to understand the implementation of INA-CBGs system and organization response in the institutional perspective at RSUD Dr. Saiful Anwar (RSSA). To achieve these objectives, a descriptive qualitative method was used with case study as a strategy. The implementationof INA-CBGs system was analyzed using the institutional forces that exist in the institutional theory of Dimaggio& Powell (1983), and analysis of an organization's response wasbased onstrategic responses ofinstitutional forces by Oliver (1991). The results showed that coercive pressures in the implementation of the INA-CBGs system derived from government regulations.Source normative pressure came from the education and professional standards. Source mimetic pressures came from competition with other hospitals andthe uncertainty of the health industry environment. The strategic response in facingcoercive pressure wasgiving a passive approval and performsomestrategic innovation. While the normative pressurewas responded by training and a more selective recruitment process. Last response related to mimetic pressurewasby imitating theexisting practice from other hospitals.


Keywords


Institutional forces, INA-CBGs Systems, Strategic response

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abernethy, M., &Stoelwinder, J. (1995). The role of professional control in the management of complex organizations. Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 20(1), pp. 1-17.

Ashworth, R., Boyne, G.,&Delbridge, R. (2009). Escape from the Iron Cage? Organizational change and Isomorphic Pressures in the Public Sector. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Vol. 19(1), pp. 165-187.

Boon, C., Paauwe, J., Boselie, P., &Hartog, D. (2009). Institutional pressures and HRM:developing institutional fit. Personnel Review, Vol. 38 Iss 5 pp. 492 - 508.

Brunsson, N. (1989). The organization of Hypocrisy: Talk, Decisions, and Actions in Organizations. New York, Wiley.

Caemmerer, B., &Marck, M. (2009). The impact of isomorphic pressures on the development of organisational service orientation in public services. In: Australian and New Zealand Marketing Academy.

Caves, D. W., & Christensen, L. R. (1980). The relative efficiency of public and private firms in a competitive environment: the case of Canadian railroads. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 88, pp. 958-976.

Clemens, B. W., & Douglas, T. J. (2005). Understanding strategic responses to institutional pressures. Journal of Business Research, Vol. 58(9), pp. 1205-1213.

Covaleski, M. A., Dirsmith, M. W., &Michelman, J. E. (1993). An Institutional Theory Perspective on the DRG Framework, Case-mix Accounting Systems and Health-care Organizations. Accounting. Organizations and Society, Vol. 18, issue 1, pp. 65-80.

DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. (1983). ‘The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields’. American Sociological Review, Vol. 48, pp. 147-160.

DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. (1991).Introduction. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. University of Chicago Press.

Fahlevi, H. (2014). Accounting Innovations After the Adoption of Diagnostic Related Groups (DRGs) Provider Payment System. International Accounting Conference and 2nd Accounting Students Research Forum, Universitas Indonesia Depok, 24-25 November 2014.

Forgione, D. A., Vermeer, T. E., Surysekar, K., Wrieden, J. A., &Plante, C. A. (2009). The Impact of DRG-Based Payment Systems on Quality of Health Care in OECD Countries. Journal of Health Care Finance.

Goodman, J. C., & Musgrave, G. L. (1992).Patient Power: Solving America's Health Care Crisis. Washington: Cato Institute.

Goodstein, J. (1994). Institutional pressures and strategic responsiveness: Employer involvement in work-family issues. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 37(2), pp. 350-382.

Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Sahlin, K.,&Suddaby, R. (2008). Introduction. The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. London, SAGE Publications: 1-46.

Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1977). The population ecology of organisations. American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 82(5), pp. 929-964.

Harcourt, M., Lam, H.,& Harcourt, S. (2005). Discriminatory Practices in Hiring: Institutional and Rational Economic Perspectives. The International Journal of Human ResourceManagement, Vol. 16(11), pp. 2113-2132.

Hasaart, F. (2011). Incentives in the Diagnosis Treatment Combination payment system for specialist medical care. A research about behavioral responses of medical specialists and hospitals in the Netherlands. (Doctoral thesis), Maastricht: UniversitairePers Maastricht.

Haunschild, P. R., & Miner, A. S. (1997). Modes of interorganizational imitation: The effects of salience and uncertainty. Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 42(3), pp. 472-500.

Havighurst, C. C. (1984). Doctors and Hospitals: An Antitrust Perspective on Traditional Relationships. Duke Law Journal, Vol. 6, pp. 1071-1162.

Hopwood, A. G. (1992).‘Accounting Calculation and the Shifting Sphere of the Economic’. European Accounting Review, Vol 1, no.1, pp. 125-143.

Maurice, M., Sellier, F.,& Silvestre, J. (1986).The Social Bases of Industrial Power.Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.

Meyer, J., & Rowan, B. (1977). ‘Institutional Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony’. American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 83, pp. 340-363.

Miles, M., & Huberman, B. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis. London, Sage.

Mulawarman, A. D. (2010). IntegrasiParadigmaAkuntansi: RefleksiAtasPendekatanSosiologiDalamIlmuAkuntansi. JurnalAkuntansiMultiparadigma, Vol.1 No.1 April 2010.

Murphy, A., &Garavan, T. N. (2009). The adoption and diffusion of an NHRD standard: A conceptual framework. Human Resource Development Review, Vol. 8(1), pp. 3-21.

Najeeb, A.(2014). How do Institutional Forces Shape HRM Practices? A Research of Tourist Resorts in the Maldives. Doctor of Philosophy thesis,School of Management, Operations and Marketing, University of Wollongong.

Oliver, C. (1991). “Sustainable competitive advantage: combining institutional and resource-based views”. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 18, No. 9, pp. 697-713.

Paauwe, J., &Boselie, P. (2003). Challenging 'strategic HRM' and the relevance of the institutional setting. Human Resource Management Journal, Vol. 13(3), pp. 56-70.

PeraturanMenteriKesehatanNomor 55 Tahun 2013 TentangPenyelenggaraanRekamMedis.

Scott, W. R. (1995).Institutions and Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage.

Scott, W. R. (1987). The adolescence of institutional theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 32(4), pp. 493-511.

Scott, W. R. (2008). Institutions and Organisations: Ideas and Interests. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage.

Sukoharsono, E. G. (2006). AlternatifRisetKualitatifSainsAkuntansi: Biografi, Phenomenologi, Grounded Theory, Critical Ethnografidan Case Research. Dipublikasikan di AnalisaMakrodanMikro: JembatanKebijakanEkonomi Indonesia hal. 230-245. BPFE UniversitasBrawijaya.

Thompson, J. D. (1987). "With Cat-Like Tread, the DRGs are Coming". Journal of Management in Medicine, Vol. 2, Iss 3, pp. 193-207.

Yin, R. K. (2009).Case Research: Design and Methods (4th Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.

Zalan, T., & Lewis, G. (2004). Writing about methods in qualitative research: Towards a moore transparent approach. Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods for International Business. R. Marschan-Piekkari and C. Welch. UK, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited. 507-528.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26675/jabe.v2i2.11224

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Citrus Clarias, Eko G Sukoharsono, Aji D Mulawarman

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This Journal Indexed by:

            

 

Lisensi Creative Commons
Ciptaan disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional.