Perbedaan Hasil Belajar Kognitif Antara Siswa yang Dibelajarkan dengan Model Pembelajaran Learning Cycle 5e dan Learning Cycle 5e-Mind Mapping pada Materi Larutan Penyangga

Rakhmah Marisna, Darsono Sigit

Abstract


Abstract: This study aims to determine the implementation of learning process and student cognitive learning outcomes on buffer material materials using Learning Cycle model 5E-mind mapping and Learning Cycle 5E learning model. This research uses experimental quasi design with posttest only control group design model. The population of this study is all students of grade XI IPA SMAN 5 Malang. The sample of research is class XI G4 as experimental class which was taught by Learning Cycle 5E-mind mapping and class XI F4 as control class which was taught by Learning Cycle 5E. Instruments used in the study include learning instruments (Syllabus, RPP, and LKS) and measurement instruments (Daily Deuteration and Observation Sheets). The results showed that the implementation of Learning Cylce 5E-Mind mapping model has an average of 93.76% and Learning Cycle 5E of 92.90% and there are differences in cognitive learning outcomes among students who are taught by Learning Cycle 5E-Mind Mapping and Learning Cycle 5E. The average cognitive learning outcomes of students who were taught by Learning Cycle 5E-Mind Mapping was 81.13, higher than students who were taught by Learning Cycle 5E that is equal to 75.16

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui keterlaksanaan proses pembelajaran dan hasil belajar kognitif siswa pada materi larutan penyangga menggunakan model pembelajaran Learning Cycle 5E-mind mapping dan model pembelajaran Learning Cycle 5E. Penelitian ini menggunakan rancangan quasi experimental dengan model posttest only control group design. Populasi penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas XI IPA SMAN 5 Malang. Sampel penelitian yaitu kelas XI G4 sebagai kelas eksperimen yang dibelajarkan dengan Learning Cycle 5E-mind mapping dan kelas XI F4 sebagai kelas kontrol yang dibelajarkan dengan Learning Cycle 5E. Instrumen penelitian terdiri dari instrumen pembelajaran (Silabus, RPP, dan LKS) dan instrumen pengukuran (Soal Ulangan Harian dan Lembar Observasi). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa keterlaksanaan model pembelajaran Learning Cylce 5E-Mind mapping memiliki rata-rata sebesar 93,76% dan Learning Cycle 5E sebesar 92,90% serta ada perbedaan hasil belajar kognitif antara siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan Learning Cycle 5E-Mind mapping dan Learning Cycle 5E. Rata-rata hasil belajar kognitif siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan Learning Cycle 5E-Mind Mapping adalah 81,13, lebih tinggi dari siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan Learning Cycle 5E yaitu sebesar 75,16.


Keywords


learning cycle 5E; mind mapping; cognitive learning outcomes; buffer solution; hasil belajar kognitif; larutan penyangga

Full Text:

PDF

References


Al-Jarf, Reima. (2009). Enchancing Freshman Students; Writing Skills with a Mind Mapping Software. Makalah disajikan pada The 5th International Scientific Conference E-Learning and Software for Education in Bucharest, 9-10 April 2009. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download;jsessionid=C59CFDDB077D1253486EE0B232C7D695?doi=10.1.1.470.9787&rep=rep1&type=pdf.

Bybee, R. W. (2009). The BSCS 5E Instructional Model and 21st Century Skills. Makalah disajikan pada Workshop on Exploring The Intersection of Science Education and The Development of 21st Century Skills, Januari 2009.

Effendy. (2016). Ilmu Kimia untuk Siswa SMA dan MA Kelas X Jilid 1A. Malang: Indonesia Academic Publishing.

Fraenkel danWallen. (2016). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education Seventh Edition. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.

Iskandar, S. M. (2011). Pendekatan pembelajaran Sains berbasis Konstruktivis. Malang: Bayumedia Publishing.

Rohmah. (2011). Pengaruh Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Learning Cycle 5E terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas XI IPA SMA Negeri 4 Malang pada Materi Pokok Hidrolisis Garam. Skripsi tidak diterbitkan. Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang.

Sunyono, W. W. I., Suyanto, E., & Suyadi, G. (2009). Analisis Masalah Kesulitan dalam Pembelajaran Kimia SMA di Provinsi Lampung. Retrieved from https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:W_IN3L16GZMJ:https://sunyonoms.files.wordpress.com/2012/12/artikel_pmipa-_sunyono.doc+&cd=1&hl=id&ct=clnk&gl=id.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v3i7.11332

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Rakhmah Marisna, Darsono Sigit

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


JPtpp is accredited “Rank 2” as a scientific journal under the decree of the Directorate General of Research Enhancement and Development, Ministry of Research, Technology, and Higher Education, dated October 24, 2018, No: 30/E/KPT/2018, effective for five years from Volume 3 Issue 1, 2018 until Volume 7 Issue 8, 2022.


Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan

Journal Of Education

Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang

Lisensi Creative Commons

JPtpp is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License