Pengaruh PBL dengan Scaffolding Prosedural terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Ditinjau dari Kemampuan Tinggi dan Rendah Siswa

Feny Puspitaningsih, Wartono Wartono, Supriyono Koes Handayanto

Abstract


Abstract: This study aims to find out the effect of PBL with procedural scaffolding toward high-order thinking skills in terms of students' high and low ability. This research used non equivalent control group design with 34 students of experimental class and 35 students of control class. The hypothesis test of this study used Two-Way ANOVA and showed that the effect of PBL with procedural scaffolding was 42.5%, while the effect of students' initial ability was 37.9%. The mean posttest grade of the experimental class is higher than the control class, indicating that PBL with procedural scaffolding affects students' high-order thinking skill.

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh PBL dengan scaffolding prosedural terhadap kemampuan berpikir tingkat tinggi ditinjau dari kemampuan tinggi dan rendah siswa. Penelitian ini menggunakan desain non equivalent control group dengan 34 siswa kelas eksperimen dan 35 siswa kelas kontrol. Uji hipotesis penelitian ini menggunakan Two-Way ANOVA dan menunjukkan bahwa pengaruh PBL dengan scaffolding prosedural sebesar 42,5%, sedangkan pengaruh kemampuan awal siswa sebesar 37,9%. Skor rerata posttest siswa kelas eksperimen lebih tinggi daripada kelas kontrol, menunjukkan bahwa PBL dengan scaffolding prosedural memengaruhi kemampuan berpikir tingkat tinggi siswa. 


Keywords


PBL; procedural scaffolding; high-level thinking skills; PBL; scaffolding prosedural; kemampuan berpikir tingkat tinggi

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bilgin, I., Şenocak, E., & Sözbilir, M. (2009). The Effects of Problem-Based Learning Instruction on University Students’ Performance of Conceptual and Quantitative Problems in Gas Concepts. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 5(2), 153–164.

Choo, S. S. Y., Rotgans, J. I., Yew, E. H. J., & Schmidt, H. G. (2011). Effect of Worksheet Scaffolds on Student Learning in Problem-Based Learning. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 16(4), 517–528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-011-9288-1.

Heong, Y. M., Yunos, J. M., Othman, W., Hassan, R., Kiong, T. T., & Mohamad, M. M. (2012). The Needs Analysis of Learning Higher Order Thinking Skills for Generating Ideas. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59, 197–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.265.

King, F. J., Goodson, L., & Rohani, F. (1998). Higher Order Thinking Skills. Publication of the Educational Services Program, Now Known as the Center for Advancement of Learning and Assessment. Obtido de: Www.cala.fsu.edu, 1–176. Retrieved from http://www.cala.fsu.edu/files/higher_order_thinking_skills.pdf.

Limbach, B., & Waugh, W. (2010). Developing Higher Level Thinking. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 9. Retrieved from https://aabri.com/manuscripts/09423.pdf.

Osman, K., Hiong, L. C., & Vebrianto, R. (2013). 21st Century Biology: An Interdisciplinary Approach of Biology, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 102, 188–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.732.

Şahin, M. (2009). Exploring University Students’ Expectations and Beliefs about Physics and Physics Learning in a Problem-based Learning Context. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science, and Technology Education, 5(4), 321–333.

Tarhan, L., Ayar-Kayali, H., Urek, R. O., & Acar, B. (2008). Problem-based learning in 9th grade chemistry class: “Intermolecular forces.” Research in Science Education, 38(3), 285–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-007-9050-0.

Taşoğlu, A. K., & Bakaç, M. (2010). The Effects of Problem Based Learning and Traditional Teaching Methods on Students’ Academic Achievements, Conceptual Developments and Scientific Process Skills According to their Graduated High School Types. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 2409–2413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.346

Turiman, P., Omar, J., Daud, A. M., & Osman, K. (2012). Fostering the 21st Century Skills through Scientific Literacy and Science Process Skills. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59, 110–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.253.

Wu, H.-L. (2010). Scaffolding in Technology-Enhanced Science Education. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, (May), 145. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.

Yilmaz, K. (2008). Constructivism: Its Theoretical Underpinnings, Variations, and Implications for Classroom Instruction. Educatio Nal Horizons, 86(3), 161–172. https://doi.org/10.2307/42923724.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v3i7.11333

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Feny Puspitaningsih, Wartono Wartono, Supriyono Koes Handayanto

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


JPtpp is accredited “Rank 2” as a scientific journal under the decree of the Directorate General of Research Enhancement and Development, Ministry of Research, Technology, and Higher Education, dated October 24, 2018, No: 30/E/KPT/2018, effective for five years from Volume 3 Issue 1, 2018 until Volume 7 Issue 8, 2022.


Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan

Journal Of Education

Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang

Lisensi Creative Commons

JPtpp is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License