Analisis Penguasaan Konsep Siswa pada Materi Fluida Statis

Muhamad Bahar Sofiuddin, Sentot Kusairi, Sutopo Sutopo

Abstract


Abstract: This study aims to describe mastery of high school students concept on static fluid material. The method used is descriptive analysis. Data were taken from 69 students of MAN 1 Tulungagung 12th grade. The instrument consists of nine items of multiple choice test with reason. The result of the analysis shows that the students' mastery of concept on static fluid material is good with average value of 63.45. Students have  some difficulty especially at the hydrostatic pressure of a system that has different room. Almost students are difficult when comparing the bouyant force an object under different conditions.

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan penguasaan konsep siswa SMA pada materi fluida statis. Metode yang digunakan adalah analisis deskriptif. Data diambil dari 69 siswa MAN 1 Tulungagung kelas XII. Instrumen berupa sembilan butir soal tes berbentuk pilihan ganda disertai dengan alasan. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa penguasaan konsep siswa pada materi fluida statis tergolong baik dengan nilai rata-rata 63,45. Siswa memiliki kesulitan pada bahasan tentang tekanan hidrostatis suatu sistem yang memiliki ruangan berbeda. Serta banyak siswa mengalami kesulitan saat membandingkan gaya angkat yang dialami suatu benda pada kondisi yang berbeda.


Keywords


mastery of concept; static fluid; penguasaan konsep; fluida statis

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing (A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives). New York, Wesley Longman.

Andrini, V. S. (2016). The Effectiveness of Inquiry Learning Method to Enhance Students’ Learning Outcome : A Theoritical and Empirical Review. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(3), 38–42.

Arikunto, S. 2009. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Çepni, S., & Şahin, Ç. (2012). Effect of Different Teaching Methods and Techniques Embedded in the 5E Instructional Model on Students’ Learning about Buoyancy Force. Eurasian Journal of Physics and …, 4(2), 97–127. Retrieved from http://eurasianjournals.com/index.php/ejpce/article/viewArticle/739.

Dahar, R. W. (2011). Teori Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Bandung: Erlangga.

Datur, I. S., Yuliati, L., & Mufti, N. (2016). Eksplorasi Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Siswa Fisika pada Materi Fluida Statis. In Pros. Semnas Pend. IPA Pascasarjana UM (pp. 294–300).

Duschl, R. A., & Gitomer, D. H. (1993). Third Misconceptions Seminar Proceedings (1993). In Third Misconceptions Seminar Proceedings (pp. 1–36). Misconceptions Trust.

Johnson, D.W. & Johnson, R.T. (1998). Cooperative Learning and Social Independence Theory. In R.S Tindale (ed), Theory and Research on Small Group (pp. 99-35).

Kiray, S.A., Aktan, F., Kaynar, H., Klininc, S., & Gorkemli, T. (2015). A Descriptive Study of Pre-Service Science Teacher’s Misconception about Sinking-Floating. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 16 (2).

Kurniawan, B. R., Handayanto, S. K., & Parno. (2016). Profil Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Mahasiswa Fisika Fisika Universitas Negeri Malang. In Pros. Semnas Pend. IPA Pascasarjana UM (pp. 105–111).

Kusairi, S., Alfad, H., & Zulaikah, S. (2017). Development of Web-Based Intelligent Tutoring (iTutor) to Help Students Learn Fluid Statics. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 14(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10194a.

Ozcan, O., & Gercek, C. (2015). What are the Pre-service Physics Teachers’ Opinions about Context Based Approach in Physics Lessons? Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197(February), 892–897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.269.

Serway, R. A., & Jewett, J. W. (2004). Physics for Scientists and Engineers (6th Edition) (6th ed.). Thomson Brooks/Cole.

Sungkawan, R., & Motlan. (2013). Physic with Advance Organizer Learning Based Experiment Toward Students ’ Physic Learning Achievement. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 2(1), 73–80.

Suskavcevic, M. (2005). Pre-Service Teacher’s Understanding of Static Fluids. Makalah disajikan dalam Seminar The SUN Conference, El Paso TX, 3-5 Maret.

Ultay, E., & Ultay, N. (2012). Designing, Implementing and Evaluating a Context-Based Instructional Materials on Buoyancy Force. Energy Education Science and Technology Part B: Social and Educational Studies, 201–205.

Wijaya, C. P., Handayanto, S. K., & Muhardjito. (2016). The Diagnosis of Senior High School Class X MIA B Students Misconceptions about Hydrostatic Pressure Concept Using Three-Tier. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 5(1), 14–21. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v5i1.5784.

Yance, R. D., Ramli, E., & Mufit, F. (2013). Pengaruh Penerapan Model Project Based Learning (PBL) terhadap Hasil Belajar Fisika Siswa Kelas XI IPA SMA Negeri 1 Batipuh Kabupaten Tanah Datar. Pillar of Physics Education, 1, 48–54.

Yusrizal. (2016). Analysis of Difficulty Level of Physics National Examination’s Questions. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 5(1), 140–149. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v5i1.5803.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v3i7.11369

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Muhamad Bahar Sofiuddin, Sentot Kusairi, Sutopo Sutopo

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


JPtpp is accredited “Rank 2” as a scientific journal under the decree of the Directorate General of Research Enhancement and Development, Ministry of Research, Technology, and Higher Education, dated October 24, 2018, No: 30/E/KPT/2018, effective for five years from Volume 3 Issue 1, 2018 until Volume 7 Issue 8, 2022.


Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan

Journal Of Education

Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang

Lisensi Creative Commons

JPtpp is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License