Analisis Proses Berpikir Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Geometri Spasial PISA

Dwi Rahmawati Utami, Gatot Muhsetyo, Susiswo Susiswo


Abstract: PISA is one of international meassurement for student competence. PISA 2015 result show that Indonesia in the low position. This research aims to know the thinking procees of student in order to solve Spacial Geometry PISA problems. Thinking proses shows in cognitive maps using information process theory. This research using 3 students with high, middle, and low cognitive ability as subjects and given 6 problems according to PISA levels. This research shows that student with high cognitive ability having complete thinking proses, student with middle and low cognitive ability having a lost concept on the middle and high-level problems.

Abstrak: PISA merupakan salah satu alat pengukuran kemampuan siswa. Dari hasil PISA 2015 Indonesia menduduki posisi rendah. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui proses berpikir siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal geometri spasial PISA. Proses berpikir ditunjukkan dalam pemetaan kognitif berdasarkan teori pemrosesan informasi. Penelitian menggunakan tiga orang siswa dengan kemampuan kognitif tinggi, rendah, sedang, rendah dengan mengerjakan enam soal mirip PISA yang merepresentasikan setiap level. Penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa siswa berkemampuan tinggi mengalami proses berpikir yang sempurna, siswa berkempampuan sedang dan rendah mengalami hilang konsep pada soal level sedang dan atas.


spatial geometry; thought process; information processing theory; geometri spasial; proses berpikir; teori pemrosesan informasi

Full Text:




Ahmad., & Jaelani, A. (2015). Kemampuan Spasial: Apa dan Bagaimana Cara Meningkatkannya. Jurnal Pendidikan Nusantara Indonesia. Retrieved from

Crowley, L., & Tall, D. (1999). The Roles of Cognitive Units, Connections and Procedures in Achieving Goals in College Algebra. Proceedings of the 23rd Conference of PME, (1979), 225–232.

OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 Assessment and Analytical Framework: Science, Reading, Mathematic and Financial Literacy. OECD Publishing.

Slavin, R. E. (2008). Cooperative Learning, Success for All, and Evidence-based Reform in Education. Éducation Et Didactique, 2(2), 149–157.

Wardono, Waluya, S. B., Mariani, S., & Candra, S. D. (2016). Mathematics Literacy on Problem Based Learning with Indonesian Realistic Mathematics Education Approach Assisted E-Learning Edmodo. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 693(1).

White, A. L. (2010). Numeracy, Literacy and Newman’s Error Analysis. Allan Leslie White Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in Southeast Asia, 33(2), 129–148.

Wijaya, A., Heuvel-panhuizen, M. Van Den., & Doorman, M. (2014). E-3 Identifying (Indonesian) Students’ Difficulties in Solving Context-Based (PISA) Mathematics Tasks. International Seminar on Innovation in Mathematics and Mathematics Education 1st ISIM-MED.

Wijaya, A., Heuvel-panhuizen, M. Van Den, Doorman, M., & Robitzch, A. (2014). Difficulties in Solving Context-Based PISA mathematics tasks : An Analysis of Students’ Errors. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 11(3), 555–584. Retrieved from



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2018 Dwi Rahmawati Utami, Gatot Muhsetyo, Susiswo Susiswo

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

JPtpp is accredited “Rank 2” as a scientific journal under the decree of the Directorate General of Research Enhancement and Development, Ministry of Research, Technology, and Higher Education, dated October 24, 2018, No: 30/E/KPT/2018, effective for five years from Volume 3 Issue 1, 2018 until Volume 7 Issue 8, 2022.

Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan

Journal Of Education

Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang

Lisensi Creative Commons

JPtpp is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License