Pengaruh Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing dengan Penyajian Representasi Submikroskopik yang Berbeda terhadap Pemahaman Konseptual Siswa pada Materi Sel Volta
Abstract
Abstract: The research was aimed to know the difference of conceptual understanding between two groups who was learned by guided inquiry with static visualization (IT-vis) and guided inquiry with analogy (IT-log) on galvanic cell Quasy experiment which nonequivalent posttet only control group design was used n this research. Learning chemistry must be explicitly to give submicroscopic aspects such as flow of electron and migration of ions. Static visualization visualises directly submicroscopic aspect by giving particulate image, but analogy visualises undirectly submicroscopic aspect by giving verbal information (analog concept). The result of mann whitney u test showed that conceptual understanding between two groups is significantly difference. Mean rank of IT-vis 32,88 is higher than IT-log 28,12. Studets’ conceptual understanding of IT-vis is higher than IT-log on galvanic cell. The difference characteristic of static visualization and analogy can influence students’ conceptual understanding.
Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perbedaan pemahaman konseptual siswa setelah melaksanakan pembelajaran inkuiri terbimbing dengan visualisasi statis (IT-vis) dan analogi (IT-log) pada materi sel volta. Jenis penelitian adalah quasy experiment dengan desain nonequivalent posttest only control group. Pembelajaran perlu mengeksplisitkan aspek submikroskopik seperti aliran elektron dan migrasi ion. Visualisasi statis memvisualisasikan aspek submikroskopik secara langsung melalui gambar tingkat partikel, sedangkan analogi memvisualisasikan secara tidak langsung melalui informasi verbal (konsep analog). Hasil uji mann whitney menunjukkan bahwa ada perbedaan pemahaman yang signifikan antara siswa dibelajarkan dengan IT-vis dan IT-log. Nilai mean rank IT-vis 32,88 lebih tinggi daripada IT-log 28,12. Pemahaman siswa IT-vis lebih baik daripada siswa IT-log. Karakteristik yang berbeda antara visualisasi statis dan analogi memengaruhi pemahaman konseptual siswa.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abbot, M. L. (2011). Understanding Educational Statistics Using Microsoft Excel and SPSS. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
Abel, K. B., & Halenz, D. R. (1992). Enzyme Activity: A Simple Analogy. Journal of Chemical Education, 69(1), 9.
Acar, B., & Tarhan, L. (2006). Effect of Cooperative Learning Strategies on Students’ Understanding of Concepts in Electrochemistry. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5, 349-373.
Asnawi, R. (2015). Miskonsepsi pada Materi Elektrokimia Ditinjau dari Kemampuan Berpikir Ilmiah Siswa. Tesis tidak diterbitkan. Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang.
Bodner, G. M. (1986). Constructivism: A Theory of Knowledge. Journal of Chemical Education, 63, 873—878.
Brown, D., E. & Clement, J. (1989). Overcoming Misconceptions Via Analogical Reasoning: Abstract Transfer Versus Explanatory Model Construction. Instructional Science, 18, 237—261.
Chima, I. B., & Onyebuchi, O. E. (2011). Using Culturally-Based Analogical Concepts in Teaching Secondary School Science: Model of a Lesson Plan. International Journal of Science and Technology Education Research, 2(1), 1—5.
Effendy. (2012). A Level Chemistry for Senior High School Students Volume 3. Malang: Indonesian Academic Publishing.
Gabel, D. (2003). Enhancing the Conceptual Understanding of Science. Winter Educational Horizons.
Garnett, P., J. & Treagust, D. F. (1992). Conceptual Difficulties Experienced by Senior High School Students of Electrochemistry: Electric Circuits and Oxidation-Reduction Equations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(10), 1079—1099.
Hakim, A., Liliasari., & Kadarohman, A. (2012). Student Concept Understanding of Natural Products Chemistry in Primary and Secondary Metabolites Using the Data Collecting Technique of Modified CRI. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 4(3), 544—553.
Hanson, D. M. (2006). Foundations of Chemistry: Applying POGIL Principles. Lisle, IL: Pacific Crest, 2006.
Harrison & De joung. (2005). Using Multiple Analogies: Case Study of A Chemistry Teacher’s Preparations. Presentations and Reflections. Research and the Quality of Science Education, 353—364.
Harrison, A., G. & Treagust, D. F. (1993). Teaching with Analogies: A Case Study in Grade-10 Optics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(10), 1291—1307.
Harrison, A., G. & Treagust, D. F. (2006). Teaching and Learning With Analogies: Friend or Foe?. Metaphor and Analogy in Science Education, 11—24.
Herunata. (2003). Analisis Pemahaman Konsep-Konsep Elektrokimia Pasca Pembelajaran dengan Bahan Ajar Terpadu Berbasis Pendekatan Mikroskopis-Mikroskopis dan Mikroskopis-Makroskopis. Tesis tidak diterbitkan. Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang.
Johnstone, A. H. (1993). The Development of Chemistry Teaching: A Changing Response to Changing Demand. Journal of Chemical Education, 70(9), 701. DOI: 10.1021/ed070p701
Landis, J. R. & Koch, G. G. (1977). The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data. Biometrics, 33, 159—174.
Orgill, M & Bodner, G. (2007). An Analysis of Biochemistry Students’ use of Analogies. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 35(4), 244—254.
Ormrod, J. (2009). Psikologi Pendidikan Membantu Siswa Tumbuh dan Berkembang. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Marais, A. F. (2011). Overcoming Conceptual Difficulties in First-year Chemistry Students by Applying Concrete Teaching Tools. South African Journal of Chemistry, 64, 151—157.
Metianing. (2009). Analisis Pemahaman Konseptual dan Algoritmik Materi Stoikiometri Gas melalui Tes Pilihan Ganda dan Tes Essay pada Siswa Kelas X Madrasah Aliyah Al Khairat Toli-Toli serta Upaya Perbaikan melalui Pendekatan Mikroskopis. Tesis tidak diterbitkan. Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang.
Muhajir. (2008). Pengaruh Penggunaan Analogy Bergambar melalui Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe STAD terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas XI IPA SMA Laboratorium Universitas Negeri Malang Pada Materi Pokok Laju Reaksi. Tesis tidak diterbitkan. Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang.
Pekmez, E. S. (2010). Using Analogies to Prevent Misconceptions About Chemical Equilibrium. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 11(2), 1.
Sanger, M., J. (1996). Identifying, Attributing, and Dispelling Student Misconceptions in Electrochemistry. Disertasi dipublikasikan. Iowa State University.
Sanger, M. J., & Greenbowe, T. J. (1998). Common Student Misconceptions in Electrochemistry: Galvanic, Electrolytic, and Concentration Cells. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(4), 377—398. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199704)34:4<377:AID-TEA7>3.0.CO;2-O
Santrock, J. (2014). Psikologi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Salemba Humanika.
Sulistina, O, Dasna, I.W, & Iskandar, S. M. (2010). Penggunaan Metode Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbuka dan Inkuiri Terbimbing dalam Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Kimia Siswa Kelas X SMA Laboratorium Malang. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 17(1), 82—88.
Sunyono, Yuanita, L., & Ibrahim, M. (2015). Supporting Students in Learning with Multiple Representation to Improve Student Mental Models on Atomic Structure Concepts. Science Education International, 26(2), 104—125.
Suyono. (2014). Misconception Prevention of Senior High School Students on Chemistry Concepts Using Several Inquiry-Based Learning Models. Makalah disajikan dalam Proceeding of International Conference On Research, Implementation and Education of Mathematics and Sciences 2014, Yogyakarta State University, 18—20 May 2014.
Tural, G. (2015). Cross-Grade Comparison of Students’ Conceptual Understanding with Lenses in Geometric Optics. Science Education International, 26(3), 325—346.
Winarti, A. (1998). Analisis Pemahaman Konsep Asam Basa melalui Penggambaran Mikroskopis dan Hubungannya dengan Kemampuan Berpikir Formal Mahasiswa Program Studi Pendidikan Kimia FKIP UNLAM Banjarmasin. Tesis tidak diterbitkan. Institut Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Malang, Malang.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v3i11.11750
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2019 Findiyani Ernawati Asih, Suhadi Ibnu, Suharti Suharti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan Journal of Education: Theory, Research, and Development Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang JPtpp is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License |