Pengetahuan Calon Guru Matematika tentang Kurikulum 2013 dalam Penyusunan RPP

Rani Martalisa Taorina, Tjang Daniel Chandra, Sisworo Sisworo

Abstract


Abstract: This research was aimed to know the knowledge of preservice mathematics teachers about Curriculum 2013 in making lesson plans. Knowledge of curriculum in this study is divided into analysis of learning objectives, selection of learning strategies, and management of learning activities. Based on the findings and data analysis, the knowledge of subject 1 (S1) and subject 2 (S2) is tend to be similar and show that with very good curriculum knowledge, there is an inappropriate understanding about  the correlation between curriculum materials; suitability of the basic competencies and the indicators; correlation between subject materials to the selection of learning models, learning resources and media; making apperception and motivation; correlation of learning activities and learning models; the application of scientific approach.

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengetahuan calon guru matematika tentang Kurikulum 2013 dalam penyusunan Rencana Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran. Pengetahuan tentang kurikulum pada penelitian ini terbagi dalam komponen analisis tujuan pembelajaran, pemilihan strategi pembelajaran, dan pengelolaan pembelajaran. Berdasarkan temuan dan analisis data, diperoleh pengetahuan subjek 1 (S1) dan subjek 2 (S2) cenderung serupa dan menunjukkan bahwa dengan pengetahuan tentang kurikulum yang sangat baik, masih terdapat pemahaman yang kurang tepat, seperti keterkaitan antar perangkat kurikulum; kesesuaian kopetensi dasar dan indikator pencapaian kompetensi; keterkaitan antara materi terhadap pemilihan model pembelajaran, sumber dan media belajar; penyusunan apersepsi dan motivasi; keterkaitan kegiatan pembelajaran dan model pembelajaran;  penerapan pendekatan saintifik.


Keywords


knowledge of curriculum; pre-service teacher; curriculum 2013; pengetahuan tentang kurikulum; calon guru; kurikulum 2013

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abell, S. K. (2007). Research On Science Teacher Knowledge (In S. K Abell, N. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Science Education). Mahwah: NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Arias, A. M., Bismack, A. S., Davis, E. A., & Palincsar, A. S. (2016). Interacting with a suite of educative features: Elementary science teachers’ use of educative curriculum materials: Interacting with Educative Features 2. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(3), 422–449. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21250

Arikunto, S. (2012). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan (2 ed.). Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

As’ari, A. R, Tohir, M., Valentino, E., Imron, Z., & Taufiq, I. (2017). Buku Guru Matematika SMP/MTs Kelas 7 (Revisi 2017). Jakarta: Kemendikbud.

Bidabadi, N. S., Nasrisfahani, A., Rouhollahi, A., & Khalili, R. (2016). Effective Teaching Methods in Higher Education: Requirements and Barriers, 4.

Brown, M. W. (2009). The Teacher-Tool Relationship: Theorizing the design and use of curriculum materials. (In J.T REmilard, B. A. Herbel-Eisenmann, G. M. Lloyd (Eds), Mathematics Teachers at Work: Connecting Curriculum Materials and Classroom Instruction). New York & London: Routledge.

Brown, T. (2011). Mathematics Education and Subjectivity. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1739-8

Charalambous, Charalambous Y., & Hill, Heather C. (2012). Teacher Knowledge, Curriculum Materials, and Quality of Instruction: Unpacking a Complex Realtionship.

Chauvot, J. B. (2008). Curricular Knowledge and the Work of Mathematics Teachers Educators, 17(2), 83–99.

Chen, B., & Wei, B. (2015). Examining chemistry teachers’ use of curriculum materials: in view of teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16(2), 260–272. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RP00237G

Coenders, F., Terlouw, C., Dijkstra, S., & Pieters, J. (2010). The Effects of the Design and Development of a Chemistry Curriculum Reform on Teachers’ Professional Growth: A Case Study. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21(5), 535–557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-010-9194-z

Cox, B. E., McIntosh, K. L., Terenzini, P. T., Reason, R. D., & Lutovsky Quaye, B. R. (2010). Pedagogical Signals of Faculty Approachability: Factors Shaping Faculty–Student Interaction Outside the Classroom. Research in Higher Education, 51(8), 767–788. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-010-9178-z

Grossman, P., & Thompson, C. (2008). Learning from curriculum materials: Scaffolds for new teachers? Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(8), 2014–2026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2008.05.002

Hosnan, M. (2014). Pendekatan Saintifik dan Kontekstual dalam Pembelajaran Abad 21. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.

Huda, M. (2011). Cooperative Learning: Metode, Teknik, Struktur, dan Model Penerapan. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Kemendikbud. (2016). Permendikbud Nomor 22: Standar Proses Pembelajaran pada Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Kemendikbud.

Lannin, J. K., Webb, M., Chval, K., Arbaugh, F., Hicks, S., Taylor, C., & Bruton, R. (2013). The development of beginning mathematics teacher pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 16(6), 403–426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-013-9244-5

Magnusson, S., Joseph, K., & Hilda, B. (1999). Nature, Sources, and Development of Pedagogical Content Knowledge for Science Teaching.

Mascuga-Gage, A., Simonsen, B., & Brieere, D. E. (2012). Effective Teaching Practices that Promote a Positive CAlssroom Environment.

Moursund, D. (2012). Good Math Lesson Planning and Implementation (Vol. 3). Madison: Information Age Education (IAE).

Nugroho, D. A. (2016). Implementasi Pendekatan Saintifik Sebagai Upaya Penguatan Identitas Bangsa Dalam Konstelasi Masyarakat Global.

Okorie, E. U, & Akubuilo, Francis. (2013). Towards Improving Quality of Education in Chemistry: An Investigation into Chemistry Teachers’ Knowledge of Chemistry Curriculum. International Journal of Emerging Science and Engineering (IJESE), 1(9).

Paolini, A. (2015). Enhancing Teaching Effectiveness and Student Learning Outcomes, 15.

Ratmini, W. S. (2017). The Implementation of Chemistry Practicum at SMA Laboratorium Undiksha Singaraja in The School Year 2016/2017, 6.

Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining Key Concepts in Research on Teacher’s Use of Mathematics Curricula.

Ripley, A. (2010, Januari 5). What Makes a Great Teacher. Diambil dari http://www.amandaripley.com/blog/what-makes-a-teacher-great

Sani, R. A. (2015). Pembelajaran Saintifik untuk Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Sanjaya, Wina. (2014). Strategi Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Grup.

Sherin, M. G., & Drake, C. (2009). Curriculum strategy framework: investigating patterns in teachers’ use of a reform‐based elementary mathematics curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 41(4), 467–500. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270802696115

Shulman, L.S. (1986). Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching, 15, 4–14.

Suparman, A. (1997). Model-Model Pembelajaran Interaktif. Jakarta: STIA-LAN.

Superfine, A. C. (2008). Planning for Mathematics Instruction: A Model of Experienced Teachers’ Planning Processes in the Context of a Reform Mathematics Curriculum, 18, 11–22.

Tambara, Cosmas Toga. (2015). Unpacking Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge And Skills To Develop Learners’ Problem Solving Skills In Mathematics. Stellenbosch University.

Vos, M. A. J., Taconis, R., Jochems, W. M. G., & Pilot, A. (2010). Teachers implementing context-based teaching materials: a framework for case-analysis in chemistry. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 11(3), 193–206. https://doi.org/10.1039/C005468M

Weimer, M. (2010). Building Rapport with Your Students. Diambil dari https://www.facultyfocus.com/articles/teaching-and-learning/building-rapport-with-your-students/

Zhang, D. (2008). The Effect of Teacher Education Level, Teaching Experience, And Teaching Behaviors On Student Science Achievement. Utah State University.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v3i12.11785

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Rani Martalisa Taorina, Tjang Daniel Chandra, Sisworo Sisworo

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


JPtpp is accredited “Rank 2” as a scientific journal under the decree of the Directorate General of Research Enhancement and Development, Ministry of Research, Technology, and Higher Education, dated October 24, 2018, No: 30/E/KPT/2018, effective for five years from Volume 3 Issue 1, 2018 until Volume 7 Issue 8, 2022.


Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan

Journal Of Education

Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang

Lisensi Creative Commons

JPtpp is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License