Pembelajaran Lingkungan bagi Siswa: Hubungan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif dengan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah

Diana Vivanti Sigit, Erna Heryanti, Dyah Ayu Widya Pangestika, Ilmi Zajuli Ichsan

Abstract


Abstract: The ability to think creatively and problem solving is the ability that students must have in 21st century. The purpose of this research was to determine the relationship between creative thinking skills and students' problem solving abilities in environmental change material. The research method used is descriptive correlational method. The research was conducted at High School 4 Bekasi in semester of the 2018/2019 academic year. The sample was taken through simple random sampling technique as many as 138 students. The results showed a correlation coefficient between the ability to think creatively with students' problem solving abilities of 0.825. The conclusion of this study is that there is a positive relationship between the ability to think creatively with students' problem solving skills.

Abstrak: Kemampuan berpikir kreatif dan pemecahan masalah adalah kemampuan yang harus dimiliki siswa untuk menghadapi tantangan abad ke-21. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui hubungan antara kemampuan berpikir kreatif dan kemampuan pemecahan masalah siswa pada materi perubahan lingkungan. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode deskriptif korelasional. Penelitian dilaksanakan di SMA Negeri 4 Bekasi pada semester ganjil tahun ajaran 2018/2019. Sampel diambil melalui teknik simple random sampling sebanyak 138 siswa. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan koefisien korelasi antara kemampuan berpikir kreatif dengan kemampuan pemecahan masalah siswa sebesar 0,825. Kemampuan berpikir kreatif memberikan kontribusi sebesar 68% terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah siswa. Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini adalah terdapat hubungan positif antara kemampuan berpikir kreatif dengan kemampuan pemecahan masalah siswa.


Keywords


Pendidikan Biologi Universitas Negeri Jakarta

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aguilar-Salinas, W., Ojeda-Benitez, S., Cruz-Sotelo, S., & Castro-Rodríguez, J. (2017). Model to Evaluate Pro-Environmental Consumer Practices. Environments, 4(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments4010011

Aisyah, A., Salehuddin, K., Aman, I., Yasin, R. ., & Mimiko, N. (2018). Eliciting Elements of Higher Order Thinking Skills in the Higher Secondary Examination Question Structure in Japan and Malaysia Aznur. In Proceedings of the Regional Conference on Science, Technology and Social Sciences (RCSTSS 2016) (pp. 455–464). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0074-5

Anagün, Ş. S. (2018). Teachers’ Perceptions about the Relationship between 21st Century Skills and Managing Constructivist Learning Environments. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 825–840. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11452a

Arnold, O., Kibbe, A., Hartig, T., & Kaiser, F. G. (2018). Capturing the Environmental Impact of Individual Lifestyles: Evidence of the Criterion Validity of the General Ecological Behavior Scale. Environment and Behavior, 50(3), 350–372. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916517701796

Azrai, E. P., Ernawati, E., & Sulistianingrum, G. (2017). Pengaruh Gaya Belajar David Kolb (Divergen, Assimilator, Convergen, Accommodator) Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Pada Materi Pencemaran Lingkaran. Biosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 10(1), 9–16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21009/biosferjpb.10-1.2

Bronfman, N. C., Cisternas, P. C., López-Vázquez, E., De la Maza, C., & Oyanedel, J. C. (2015). Understanding attitudes and pro-environmental behaviors in a Chilean community. Sustainability, 7(10), 14133–14152. https://doi.org/10.3390/su71014133

Callender, A. A., Franco-Watkins, A. M., & Roberts, A. S. (2016). Improving metacognition in the classroom through instruction, training, and feedback. Metacognition and Learning, 11(2), 215–235.

Chalkiadaki, A. (2018). A Systematic Literature Review of 21st Century Skills and Competencies in Primary Education. International Journal of Instruction, 11(3), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.1131a

Chang, C. C., Liang, C., Chou, P. N., & Lin, G. Y. (2017). Is game-based learning better in flow experience and various types of cognitive load than non-game-based learning? Perspective from multimedia and media richness. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 218–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.031

El-Hmoudova, D., & Milkova, E. (2015). Variations and Frequencies in Learning Styles in a Group of Czech English as Foreign Language Learners. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 182, 60–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.738

Evans, C. (2014). Twitter for teaching: Can Social Media be Used to Enhance The Process of Learning? British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(5), 902–915. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12099

Farisi, M. I. (2016). Developing the 21 st-century social studies skills through technology integration. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE, 17(1), 16–30. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.47374

Fatih, M. T. uuml rker. (2016). Design process for online websites created for teaching Turkish as a foreign language in web based environments. Educational Research and Reviews, 11(8), 642–655. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2015.2511

Fauzi, A., & Fariantika, A. (2018). Courses perceived difficult by undergraduate students majoring in biology. Biosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 11(2), 78–89. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21009/biosferjpb.v11n2.78-89

Fitriani, U., Adisyahputra, A., & Komala, R. (2018). Eco-friendly website development in biology learning based on project activities on environmental pollution. Biosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 11(1), 32–46. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21009/biosferjpb.11-1.4

Gardeli, A., Vosinakis, S., Englezos, K., Mavroudi, D., Stratis, M., & Stavrakis, M. (2017). Design and Development of Games and Interactive Installations for Environmental Awareness. EAI Endorsed Transactions on Game-Based Learning, 4(12), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.8-12-2017.153402

Gündüz, A. Y., Alemdağ, E., Yaşar, S., & Erdem, M. (2016). Design of a Problem-Based Online Learning Environment and Evaluation of its Effectiveness. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 15(3), 49–57. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

Ho, J. C. F., & Yao, M. Z. (2018). Encouraging Learners to Explore Websites: Hyperlinks as Invitations. Journal of Educators Online, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.9743/jeo.2018.15.2.4

Hyun, J., Ediger, R., & Lee, D. (2017). Students’ Satisfaction on Their Learning Process in Active Learning and Traditional Classrooms. International Journal of Teaching, 29(1), 108–118. Retrieved from http://www.isetl.org/ijtlhe/

Ichsan, I. Z., & Mulyani, S. W. W. (2018). Improving Students’ Motoric Skills Through Demonstration Method in Recycling Plastic Waste. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 4(2), 189–194. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v4i2.5890

Ichsan, I. Z., Sigit, D. V., & Miarsyah, M. (2018). Learning Environment: Gender Profile of Students’ Pro-Environmental Behavior (PEB) based on Green Consumerism. Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan Dan Ilmu Tarbiyah, 3(2), 97–107. https://doi.org/10.24042/tadris.v3i2.3358

Ichsan, I. Z., Sigit, D. V., Miarsyah, M., Azrai, E. P., & Heryanti, E. (2019). Students’ pro-environmental behavior and environmental learning outcomes based on green consumerism. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 5(1).

Jensen, J. L., McDaniel, M. A., Woodard, S. M., & Kummer, T. A. (2014). Teaching to the Test...or Testing to Teach: Exams Requiring Higher Order Thinking Skills Encourage Greater Conceptual Understanding. Educational Psychology Review, 26(2), 307–329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-013-9248-9

Juhanda, A., & Maryanto, Y. (2018). The emergence of biological problems in electronic school books (bse) class x reviewed from the scientific knowledge domain of scientific literacy. Biosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 11(2), 121–125. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21009/biosferjpb.v11n2.121-125

Jung, J. (2015). A study on the effects of the rubric on concurrent discussion in web-based environment. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in the Digital Age, CELDA 2015 (pp. 319–322). Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84961783299&partnerID=40&md5=242561e93ca57e19501a5ccdc712ff7f

Khuana, K., Khuana, T., & Santiboon, T. (2017). An instructional design model with the cultivating research-based learning strategies for fostering teacher students creative thinking abilities. Educational Research and Reviews, 12(15), 712–724. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2017.3239

Latta, M. M., Hanson, K., Ragoonaden, K., Briggs, W., & Middleton, T. (2017). Accessing the curricular play of critical and creative thinking. Canadian Journal of Education, 40(3), 191–218.

Lile, R., & Bran, C. (2014). The Assessment of Learning Outcomes. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 163, 125–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.297

Lince, R. (2016). Creative Thinking Ability to Increase Student Mathematical of Junior High School by Applying Models Numbered Heads Together. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(6), 206–212.

Markaki, V. (2014). Environmental Education through Inquiry and Technology. Science Education International, 25(1), 86–92.

Miller, A. L. (2018). The Role of Creative Coursework in Skill Development for University Seniors. Global Education Review, 5(1), 88–107.

Murphy, C., Bianchi, L., McCullagh, J., & Kerr, K. (2013). Scaling up higher order thinking skills and personal capabilities in primary science: Theory-into-policy-into-practice. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 10, 173–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2013.06.005

Nam, C., Dong, H., & Lee, Y. A. (2017). Factors influencing consumers’ purchase intention of green sportswear. Fashion and Textiles, 4(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40691-017-0091-3

Nitko, A. J., & Brookhart, S. M. (2011). Educational assesment of students. Columbus: Pearson Education.

Okur-Berbeglu, E. (2015). The Effect of Ecopodagogy-Based Environmental Education on Environmental Attitude of In-service Teachers. International Electronic Journal of Environmental Education, 5(2), 86–110. https://doi.org/10.18497/iejee-green.09988

Owens, D. C., Sadler, T. D., Barlow, A. T., & Smith-Walters, C. (2017). Student Motivation from and Resistance to Active Learning Rooted in Essential Science Practices. Research in Science Education, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9688-1

Paddison, B., & Mortimer, C. (2016). Authenticating the learning environment. Journal of Teaching in Travel and Tourism, 16(4), 331–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/15313220.2016.1245121

Pedretti, E., & Nazir, J. (2014). Tensions and opportunities: A baseline study of teachers’ views of environmental education. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 9(3), 265–283. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijese.2014.215a

Pratama, A. T. (2018). Improving metacognitive skills using problem based learning (pbl) at natural science of primary school in deli serdang, indonesia. Biosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 11(2), 101–107. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21009/biosferjpb.v11n2.101-107

Ramdhani, M. A., & Muhammadiyah, H. (2015). The Criteria of Learning Media Selection for Character Education in Higher Education. International Conference of Islamic Educatios in Shoutheast Asia, (March), 1–9.

Sangroya, D., & Nayak, J. K. (2017). Factors influencing buying behaviour of green energy consumer. Journal of Cleaner Production, 151, 393–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.010

Şener, N., Türk, C., & Taş, E. (2015). Improving Science Attitude and Creative Thinking through Science Education Project: A Design, Implementation and Assessment. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 3(4), 57–67. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v3i4.771

Song, X. (2016). “Critical Thinking” and Pedagogical Implications for Higher Education. East Asia, 33(1), 25–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12140-015-9250-6

Spinola, H. (2015). Environmental literacy comparison between students taught in Eco-schools and ordinary schools in the Madeira Island region of Portugal. Science Education International, 26(3), 392–413.

Suhendar, S., & Wahyuni, A. (2018). Achievement and response of students at favorite junior high schools in Sukabumi on trends in international mathematics and science study (TIMSS) questions. Biosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 11(2), 126–133. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21009/biosferjpb.v11n2.126-133

Tanujaya, B., Mumu, J., & Margono, G. (2017). The Relationship between Higher Order Thinking Skills and Academic Performance of Student in Mathematics Instruction. International Education Studies, 10(11), 78–85. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v10n11p78

Truelove, H. B., & Gillis, A. J. (2018). Perception of pro-environmental behavior. Global Environmental Change, 49(February), 175–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.02.009

Unal, A., & Karakuş, M. A. (2016). Interacting Science through Web Quests. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(7), 1595–1600. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2016.040712

Urbani, J. M., Truesdell, E., Urbani, J. M., Roshandel, S., Michaels, R., & Truesdell, E. (2017). Developing and Modeling 21st-Century Skills with Preservice Teachers. Teacher Education Quarterly, 44(4), 27–51.

Vicente-Molina, M. A., Fernández-Sainz, A., & Izagirre-Olaizola, J. (2018). Does gender make a difference in pro-environmental behavior? The case of the Basque Country University students. Journal of Cleaner Production, 176, 89–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.079

Vidergor, H. E., & Krupnik-Gottlieb, M. (2015). High order thinking, problem based and project based learning in blended learning environments. In Applied Practice for Educators of Gifted and Able Learners (pp. 217–232). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-004-8_11

Vijayaratnam, P. (2012). Developing Higher Order Thinking Skills and Team Commitment via Group Problem Solving: A Bridge to the Real World. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 66, 53–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.247

Wall, T. F. (2015). The Transferability of Higher Order Cognitive Skills. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 233–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.652

Weninger, C. (2018). Problematising the notion of “authentic school learning”: insights from student perspectives on media/literacy education. Research Papers in Education, 33(2), 239–254.https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2017.1286683

Widiana, I. W., Jampel, N., & Jampel, I. N. (2016). Improving Students’ Creative Thinking and Achievement through The Implementation of Multiple Intelligence Approach with Mind Mapping. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 5(3), 246–254.

Wiener-Ogilvie, S., Bennison, J., & Smith, V. (2014). General practice training environment and its impact on preparedness. Education for Primary Care, 25(1), 8–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/14739879.2014.11494236

Yang, C.-M. (2018). Applying Design Thinking as a Method for Teaching Packaging Design. Journal of Education and Learning, 7(5), 52–61. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v7n5p52

Yeung, S. yin S. (2015). Conception of teaching higher order thinking: perspectives of Chinese teachers in Hong Kong. Curriculum Journal, 26(4), 553–578. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2015.1053818

Yusop, F. D., & Sumari, M. (2013). The Use of Social Media Technologies among Malaysian Youth. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 103, 1204–1209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.448

Zhou, Q., Lee, C. S., & Sin, S. C. J. (2017). Using social media in formal learning: Investigating learning strategies and satisfaction. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 54(1), 472–482. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.2017.14505401051




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v4i1.11838

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Diana Vivanti Sigit, Erna Heryanti, Dyah Ayu Widya Pangestika, Ilmi Zajuli Ichsan

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


JPtpp is accredited “Rank 2” as a scientific journal under the decree of the Directorate General of Research Enhancement and Development, Ministry of Research, Technology, and Higher Education, dated October 24, 2018, No: 30/E/KPT/2018, effective for five years from Volume 3 Issue 1, 2018 until Volume 7 Issue 8, 2022.


Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan

Journal Of Education

Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang

Lisensi Creative Commons

JPtpp is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License