Keefektifan Model Problem Posing Dipadu Metode Resitasi terhadap Pemahaman Konsep Siswa

Agung Lesmana, Tien Aminatun

Abstract


Abstract: This aim of this study was to determine effectiveness of using problem posing model combined with recitation method on student’s conceptual understanding. The method of this study is quasy experiment with pretest-posttest control group design, with control and experiment groups. The data analysis technique used was independent t-test and continued with an analysis of N-gain value to determine effectiveness. The results showed a significant difference between the posttest values of the control group and the experiment group with a significance value of 0,000 (α = 0.05). The results of the analysis of N-gain values showed that problem posing model combined with recitation method is more effective for student's conceptual understanding.

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui keefektifan penggunaan model problem posing dipadu metode resitasi terhadap pemahaman konsep siswa. Metode penelitian ini adalah kuasi eksperimen dengan desain pretest-posttest control group design, dengan grup kontrol dan eksperimen. Tekhnik analisis data yang digunakan adalah independent t-test dan dilanjutkan dengan analisis nilai N-gain untuk mengetahui efektivitas. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan adanya perbedaan yang signifikan antara nilai posttest grup kontrol dan eksperimen dengan nilai signifikansi 0,000 (α= 0,05). Hasil analisis nilai N-gain menunjukkan bahwa model problem posing dipadu metode resitasi lebih efektif terhadap pemahaman konsep siswa.

Keywords


effectiveness; problem posing model; recitation method; conceptual understanding; keefektifan; model problem posing; metode resitasi; pemahaman konsep

Full Text:

PDF

References


Akay, H., & Boz, N. (2013). The Effect of Problem Posing Oriented Analyses-II Course on the Attitudes Toward Mathematics and Mathematics Self-Efficacy of Elementary Prospective Mathematics Teachers. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 35(1), 60–75. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2010v35n1.6

Anderson, L. W. (2010). Kerangka Landasan untuk Pembelajaran, Pengajaran dan Asesmen (Revisi Taksonomi Pendidikan Bloom). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar.

Astuti, I. A. D., & Dasmo. (2016). Upaya Meningkatkan Motivasi Belajar dan Pemahaman Konsep IPA Peserta Didik dengan Model Pembelajaran Problem Posing. Jurnal Riset dan Kajian Pendidikan Fisika, 3(2), 39–44. https://doi.org/10.12928/jrkpf.v3i2.5143

Brown, S. I., & Walter, M. I. (2005). The Art of Problem Posing (3rd ed.). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Calvalcante, P. S., Newton, D. P., & Newton, L. D. (1997). The Effect of Various Kinds of Lesson On Conceptual Understanding In Science. Research In Science & Technology Education, 15(1), 185–193. https://doi.org/://doi.org/10.1080/0263514970150205

Cankoy, O., & Darbaz, S. (2010). Effect of a Problem Posing Based Problem Solving Instruction. H.U Journal of Education, 38(1), 11–24. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.457.4670&rep=rep1&type=pdf

Chiappetta, E. L., & Koballa, T. R. (2010). Science Instruction In the Middle and Secondary Schools (7th ed.). New York: Macmillan Pub. Co.

Çimer, A. (2012). What Makes Biology Learning Difficult and Effective: Students Views. Educational Research and Reviews, 7(3), 61–71. https://doi.org/10.5897/err11.205

Clark, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2011). E-Learning and the Science of Instruction. Amerika: Pfeiffer.

Djamarah, S. B., & Zain, A. (2013). Strategi Belajara Mengajar. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.

Ferdianto, F., & Ghanny. (2014). Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemahaman Matematis Siswa melalui Problem Posing. Jurnal Euclid, 1(1), 47–54. https://doi.org/10.33603/e.v1i1.343

Gabel, D. (2003). Enhancing the Conceptual Understanding of Science. Educational Horizons, 81(2), 70–76. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/42925990?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents

Greenstein, L. (2012). Assesing Skill 21st Century. A Guide to Evaluating Mastery and Authentic Learning. U.S.A: Crowin A SAGE Company.

ICASE. (2008). Promoting Scientific and Technological Literacy (STL) for All (2th ed.) (2nd ed.). Penang: Seameo Rescam.

Inanna. (2018). Peran Pendidikan dam Membangun Karakter Bangsa yang Bermoral. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Pendidikan, 1(1), 27–33. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26858/jekpend.v1i1.5057

Isnaini, M., Aini, K., & Angraini, R. (2016). Pengaruh Strategi Pembelajaran Mind Map terhadap Pemahaman Konsep pada Materi Sistem Ekskresi Kelas XI IPA SMA Negeri 1 Pampangan Oki. Jurnal Bioilmi, 2(2), 142–150. http://jurnal.radenfatah.ac.id/index.php/bioilmi/article/view/1138/956

Kamiludin, K., & Suryaman, M. (2017). Problematika pada Pelaksanaan Penilaian Pembelajaran Kurikulum 2013. Jurnal Prima Edukasia, 5(1), 58–67. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpe.v5i1.8391

Kar, T. (2016). Prospective Middle School Mathematics Teachers’ Knowledge of Linear Graphs In Context of Problem-Posing. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 8(4), 643–658.

Kurnia, R. P., & Suryadarma, I. G. P. (2016). Perangkat Pembelajaran Biologi Kegiatan Ecotourism untuk Mengasah Keterampilan Proses Sains dan Sikap Peduli Lingkungan. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 2(2), 230–240. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v2i2.12252

Larson, L. C., & Miller, T. N. (2011). 21st Century Skills: Prepare Student for The Future. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 47(3), 121–123. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00228958.2011.10516575

Lestari, L., & Surya, E. (2017). The Effectiveness of Realistic Mathematics Education Approach on Ability of Students’ Mathematical Concept Understanding. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research, 34(1), 91–100.

Mahendra, R., Slamet, I., & Budiyono. (2017). The Effect of Problem Posing and Problem Solving with Realistic Mathematics Education Approach to The Conceptual Understanding and Adaptive Reasoning. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1913(020025), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5016659

Mills, S. (2016). Conceptual Understanding : A Concept Analysis. The Qualitative Report, 21(3), 546–557. http://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol21/iss3/8/

Moran, R. K., & Keeley, P. (2015). Teaching for Conceptual Understanding Inscience. Arlington: NSTA Press.

Murniasih, T. R., & Fayeldi, T. (2017). Metode Resitasi untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep pada Matakuliah Dasar-Dasar Pemrograman Komputer. Jurnal Edukasi, 4(1), 8–12. https://doi.org/10.19184/jukasi.v4i1.5083

Murti, K. E. (2015). Pendidikan Abad 21 dan Aplikasinya Dalam Pembelajaran di SMK. http://www.p4tksb-jogja.com/images/artikel/Pendidikan_Abad_21_dan_Aplikasinya_dalam_Pembelajaran_di_SMK_-_Kuntari.pdf

Nugroho, R. A., & Suryadarma, I. G. P. (2018). Pengaruh Servant Leadership Learning dengan Concept Mapping terhadap Pemahaman Konsep dan Berpikir Kritis Siswa. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 4(1), 114–127. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v4i1.9823

Roestiyah. (2001). Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.

Rustaman, N. Y. (2011). Pendidikan dan Penelitian Sains dalam Mengembangkan Keterampilan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi untuk Pembangunan Karakter. Makalah Seminar Nasional VIII Pendidikan Biologi, FKIP UNS, Surakarta, 8(1), 15–34. https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/prosbi/article/viewFile/7248/6428

Sadiqin, I. K., Santoso, U. T., & Sholahuddin, A. (2017). Pemahaman Konsep IPA Siswa SMP melalui Pembelajaran Problem Solving pada Topik Perubahan Benda-benda di Sekitar Kita. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 3(1), 52–62. https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v3i1.12554

Santrock, J. W. (2008). Psikologi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Prenada Media Grup.

Setiawan, E. P. A., Siswono, T. Y. E., & Ekawati, R. (2018). Implementation of Problem Posing Learning on Conceptual Understanding and Adaptive Reasoning. Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 212(1), 485–488. https://doi.org/10.2991/icei-18.2018.104

Shoimin, A. (2017). 68 Model Pembelajaran Inovatif dalam Kurikulum 2013. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media.

Siahaan, P., & Suryana, I. (2010). Hakekat Sains dan Pembelajaran Sains. 1–17. http://file.upi.edu/Direktori/fpmipa/jur._pend._fisika/195803011980021-parsaoran_siahaan/Makalah-Modul/Pelatihan_Guru_MIPA_Papua_Barat-11-15_Januari_2010/hakikat_sains_dan_Pembelajaran_IPAx.pdf

Silver, E., & Cai, J. (2005). Assessing Students’ Mathematical Problem Posing. Teaching Children Mathematics, 12(1), 129–135.

Sudarisman, S. (2015). Memahami Hakikat dan Karakteristik Pembelajaran Biologi dalam Upaya Menjawab Tantangan Abad 21 serta Optimalisasi Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Florea : Jurnal Biologi dan Pembelajarannya, 2(1), 29–35. https://doi.org/10.25273/florea.v2i1.403

SThobroni, M., & Mustofa, A. (2013). Belajar dan Pembelajaran: Pengembangan Wacana dan Praktik Pembelajaran dalam Pembangunan Nasional. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media.

Wahyudin, D., Rusman, & Rahmawati, Y. (2017). Penguatan Life Skills dalam Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 pada SMA (Sekolah Mengenah Atas) di Jawa Barat. Mimbar Pendidikan: Jurnal Indonesia untuk Pendidikan, 2(1), 65–80. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.17509/mimbardik.v2i1.6023

Widiyatmoko, A., & Shimizu, K. (2018). An Overview of Conceptual Understanding In Science Education Curriculum in Indonesia. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 983(012044), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/983/1/012044




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v4i5.12414

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Agung Lesmana, Tien Aminatun

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


JPtpp is accredited “Rank 2” as a scientific journal under the decree of the Directorate General of Research Enhancement and Development, Ministry of Research, Technology, and Higher Education, dated October 24, 2018, No: 30/E/KPT/2018, effective for five years from Volume 3 Issue 1, 2018 until Volume 7 Issue 8, 2022.


Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan

Journal Of Education

Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang

Lisensi Creative Commons

JPtpp is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License