Reading Strategy’s Failure to Deliver toward Reading Comprehension

A. Gusti Efendy, Gunadi Harry Sulistyo

Abstract


Abstract: The aim of study is investigating the relationship between Support Reading Strategy and reading comprehension. Consequently, the research method to deploy was simple linear regression. Meanwhile, because the population target of the study was all public senior high school students in the municipal area of Malang, East Java, Indonesia, the sample consisted of 301 students from three different schools. Inferring from parametric statistical analysis involving data obtained by conducting Survey of Reading Strategy (SORS) and reading test, the finding indicates that Support Reading Strategy fails to be in good favor toward students’ reading comprehension.

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bermaksud mengungkap hubungan antara Support Reading Strategy dan kemampuan memahami bacaan. Untuk itu, peneliti menggunakan metode penelitian regresi linear sederhana. Sementara itu, karena target populasi adalah seluruh siswa SMA negeri di Kota Malang, Jawa Timur, Indonesia, sampel penelitian berjumlah 301 siswa dari tiga sekolah yang berbeda. Berangkat dari analisis statistik parametrik yang mengolah data dari Survey of Reading Strategy (SORS) dan uji kemampuan membaca, temuan penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Support Reading Strategy tidak mampu membuktikan korelasi positif yang signifikan terhadap kemampuan siswa dalam memahami bacaan.

Keywords


reading comprehension; reading strategy; senior high school; pemahaman membaca; strategi membaca; SMA

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abrami, P. C., Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Surkes, M. A., Tamim, R., & Zhang, D. (2008). Instructional Interventions Affecting Critical Thinking Skills and Dispositions : A Stage 1 Meta-Analysis. 78(4), 1102–1134. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308326084

Alfassi, M. (2004). Reading to Learn: Effects of Combined Strategy Instruction on High School Students. The Journal of Educational Research, 97(4), 171–185.

Brown, H., & Lee, H. (2015). Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy (Fourth Ed). London: White Palms: Pearson Education Inc.

Creswell, J. (2010). Research Design Qualitative and Mixed Qualitative Approach. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Gebhard, J. G. (1996). Teaching English as a Foreign or Second Language: A Self-Development Guide. Ann Arbor: University Michigan Press.

Gilakjani, A. P., & Sabouri, N. B. (2016). A Study of Factors Affecting EFL Learners’ Reading Comprehension Skill and the Strategies for Improvement. International Journal of English Linguistics, 6(5), 180–187.

Gilliam, S., Magliano, J. P., Millis, K. K., Levinstein, I., & Boonthum, C. (2007). Assessing the format of the presentation of text in developing a Reading Strategy Assessment Tool (R-SAT). Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 199–204.

Grabe, W. (1991). Current Developments in Second Language Reading Research. TESOL Quarterly, 25(3), 375–406.

Hagen, Å. M., Braasch, J. L. G., & Bråten, I. (2014). Relationships Between Spontaneous Note-Taking, Self-Reported Strategies and Comprehension when Reading Multiple Texts in Different Task Conditions. Journal of Research in Reading, 37(S1), S141–S157.

Jafari, S. M., & Shokrpour, N. (2012). The Reading Strategies Used by Iranian ESP Students to Comprehend Authentic Expository Texts in English. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 1(4), 102–113.

Kataike, J., Kulaba, J., & Gellynck, X. (n.d.). What Junior Researchers Must Know Before and After Data Collection: Difference between Parametric and Nonparametric Statistics.

Kiewra, K. A., Dubois, N. F., Christensen, M., Kim, S. I., & Lindberg, N. (1989). A More Equitable Account of the Note-Taking Functions in Learning from Lecture and from Text. Instructional Science, 18(3), 217–232.

Kobayashi, K. (2009a). Comprehension of Relations Among Controversial Texts: Effects of External Strategy Use. Instructional Science, 37(4), 311–324.

Kobayashi, K. (2009b). The Influence of Topic Knowledge, External Strategy Use, and College Experience on Students’ Comprehension of Controversial Texts. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(1), 130–134.

Koda, K. (2007). Reading and language learning: Crosslinguistic Constraints on Second Language Reading Development. Language Learning, 57, 1–44. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.101997010-i1

Manoli, P. G. (2013). Developing Reading Strategies in Elementary EFL Classrooms. University of Thessaly.

Margono, S. (2004). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Mokhtari, K., & Sheorey, R. (2002). Measuring ESL Students’ Awareness of Reading Strategies. Journal of Developmental Education, 25(3), 2–11.

Musya’idah, M., & Effendy, E. Santoso, A. (2016). POGIL, Analogi Model FAR, KBI, dan Laju Reaksi. Prosiding Semnas Pendidikan IPA Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Malang, 671–680.

Nergis, A. (2013). Exploring the Factors that Affect Reading Comprehension of EAP Learners. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 12(1), 1–9.

Nosratinia, M., & Shakeri, H. (2013). Does Reading Strategy Use Correlate with Reading Comprehension of Efl Learners? International Journal of Arts & Sciences, 6(3), 299.

Permatasari, A. (2015). Reading Anxiety, Self-Efficacy, Reading Strategy Use, and Reading Comprehension of Indonesian EFL College Students. Unpublished Thesis. Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang.

Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P. (2012). Verbal Protocols of Reading: The Nature of Constructively Responsive Reading. Routledge.

Sanford, K. L. (2015). Factors that Affect the Reading Comprehension of Secondary Students with Disabilities.

Sugiyono, S. (2007). Statistika untuk Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sulistyo, G. H. (2011). Reading for Meaning. Malang: Pustaka Kaiswaran.

Tiruneh, D. T., De Cock, M., & Elen, J. (2018). Designing Learning Environments for Critical Thinking: Examining Effective instructional Approaches. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(6), 1065–1089. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9829-z

Urquhart, A. H., & Weir, C. J. (2014). Reading in a Second Language: Process, Product and Practice. Routledge.

Whitley, B. E., & Kite, M. E. (2013). Principles of Research in Behavioral Science. Routledge.

Widyawati, S. (2017). Siswa SMA dan SMK se-Malang Raya Bisa Bangga, Perhatikan Hasil UNBK Ini. Retrieved from SuryaMalang.com website: http://suryamalang.tribunnews.com/2017/04/29/siswa-sma-dan-smk-se-malang-raya-bisa-bangga-perhatikan-hasil-unbk-ini

Williams, E., & Moran, C. (1989). Reading in a Foreign Language at Intermediate and Advanced Levels with Particular Reference to English. Language Teaching, 22(4), 217–228.

Zare, M., & Mobarakeh, S. D. (2011). The Relationship Between Self-Efficacy and Use of Reading Strategies: The Case of Iranian Senior High School Students. Studies in Literature and Language, 3(3), 98.

Zoghi, M., Mustapha, R., & Maasum, T. N. R. T. M. (2010). Looking into EFL Reading Comprehension. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 7, 439–445.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v4i8.12666

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 A. Gusti Efendy, Gunadi Harry Sulistyo

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


JPtpp is accredited “Rank 2” as a scientific journal under the decree of the Directorate General of Research Enhancement and Development, Ministry of Research, Technology, and Higher Education, dated October 24, 2018, No: 30/E/KPT/2018, effective for five years from Volume 3 Issue 1, 2018 until Volume 7 Issue 8, 2022.


Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan

Journal Of Education

Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang

Lisensi Creative Commons

JPtpp is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License