Analisis Berpikir Kreatif Siswa Berkemampuan Matematika Rendah Dalam Menyelesaikan Ill-Structured Problem

Maulana Al - Ghofiqi, Santi Irawati, Rustanto Rahardi

Abstract


Abstract: The purpose of this study was to find out in detail the creative thinking of students with low mathematical abilities in solving ill-structured problems. This type of research is a case study, tconducted at SMPN 4 Waru (State Junior High School 4 Waru), Sidoarjo. 16 Students complete the ill-structured problem test, then subjects are chosen who have a level of creative thinking in the creative category and have low mathematical abilities. The results of the study showed students fulfilled the fluency aspect based on students' ability to provide at least two correct answers and were able to explain it. Flexibility aspects are fulfilled based on students' abilities in each answer written using different ideas. While the novelty aspect is not fulfilled because students do not give any unusual answers.

Abstrak: Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis berpikir kreatif siswa berkemampuan matematika rendah dalam menyelesaikan ill-structured problem. Jenis penelitian ini yaitu studi kasus, dilaksanakan di SMPN 4 Waru, Sidoarjo. 16 Siswa menyelesaikan tes ill-structured problem, selanjutnya dipilih subjek yang mempunyai level berpikir kreatif dalam kategori kreatif dan mempunyai kemampuan matematika rendah. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan siswa memenuhi aspek fluency berdasarkan kemampuan siswa dalam memberikan minimal dua jawaban benar serta mampu menjelaskannya. Aspek flexibility terpenuhi berdasarkan kemampuan siswa pada setiap jawaban yang dituliskan menggunakan ide yang berbeda, sedangkan aspek novelty tidak terpenuhi karena siswa tidak memberikan satu pun jawaban tidak biasa.

Keywords


creative thinking; problem solving; ill-structured problem; low mathematical ability berpikir kreatif; penyelesaian masalah; ill-structured problem; kemampuan matematika rendah

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arikan, E. E. (2017). Is There a Relationship between Creativity and Mathematical Creativity? Journal of Education and Learning, 6(4), 239. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v6n4p239

Ayllón, M. F., Gómez, I. A., & Ballesta-Claver, J. (2016). Pensamiento matemático y creatividad a través de la invención y resolución de problemas matemáticos. Propósitos y Representaciones, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.20511/pyr2016.v4n1.89

Chen, C.-H. (2009). Reframing Narrative Cases for Ill-Structured Contexts: The Design with Learners in Mind. Journal of Learning Design, 3(1), 34–40.

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed). Boston: Pearson.

Hong, J. Y., & Kim, M. K. (2016). Mathematical Abstraction in the Solving of Ill-Structured Problems by Elementary School Students in Korea. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(2), 267–281. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1204a

Katz, S., & Stupel, M. (2015). Promoting Creativity and Self-efficacy of Elementary Students through a Collaborative Research Task in Mathematics: A Case Study. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v4n1p68

Krisanawati, E. (2012). Kreativitas Siswa Dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika Divergen Berdasarkan kemampuan matematika siswa. MATHdunesa, 1(1), 3.

Lille, B., & Romero, M. (2017). Creativity Assessment in the Context of Maker-based Projects. Design and Technology Education: An International journal, 22(3), 32–47.

Munandar, U. S. C. (2002). Kreativitas dan Keberbakatan. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka.

Silver, E. A. (1997). Fostering Creativity through Instruction Rich in Mathematical Problem Solving and Problem Posing. Electronic Edition, 29(3). Diambil dari http://www.emis.de/journals/ZDM/zdm973a3.pdf

Sriraman, B., Haavold, P., & Lee, K. (2013). Mathematical Creativity and Giftedness: A Commentary on and Review of Theory, New Operational Views, and Ways Forward. ZDM, 45(2), 215–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0494-6

Sriwongchai, A. (2015). Developing the Mathematics Learning Management Model for Improving Creative Thinking in Thailand. International Education Studies, 8(11), 77. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v8n11p77

Sternberg, R. J., Sternberg, K., & Mio, J. S. (2012). Cognitive psychology (6th ed). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Cengage Learning.

Strauss, & Corbin, j. (2003). Dasar-dasar Penelitian Kualitatif: Tata Langkah dan Teknik-teknik Teorisasi Data. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Trnova, E. (2014). IBSE and Creativity Development. Science Education International, 25(1), 8–18.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v4i10.12883

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Maulana Al - Ghofiqi, Santi Irawati, Rustanto Rahardi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


JPtpp is accredited “Rank 2” as a scientific journal under the decree of the Directorate General of Research Enhancement and Development, Ministry of Research, Technology, and Higher Education, dated October 24, 2018, No: 30/E/KPT/2018, effective for five years from Volume 3 Issue 1, 2018 until Volume 7 Issue 8, 2022.


Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan

Journal Of Education

Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang

Lisensi Creative Commons

JPtpp is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License