DEEP LEARNING QUESTION UNTUK MENINGKATKAN PEMAHAMAN KONSEP FISIKA

Ismi Laili Afwa, Sutopo Sutopo, Eny Latifah

Abstract


Design and implementation of the program Deep Learning Question DLQs for kinematics has been done. The DLQs which is applied outside the classroom is necessary to facilitate student for comprehend the concept of kinematics and record the depth of the concept of long-term memory. DLQs programs created by adobe flash software. Data were collected from pre-post test in the form multiple choice questions along with the reason, which generate quantitative and qualitative data. The result of research DLQs programs enhance students conceptual understanding.

Telah dilakukan desain dan implementasi program Deep Learning Question DLQs untuk materi kinematika. DLQs yang diaplikasikan diluar kelas diperlukan untuk memfasilitasi mahasiswa dalam memahamkan konsep kinematika dengan baik dan merekamkan konsep tersebut secara mendalam pada memori jangka panjang. Program DLQs dikemas dengan bantuan software Adobe Flash. Data diambil dari pre-post test berupa soal pilihan ganda beserta alasannya, yang menghasilkan data kuantitatif dan kualitatif. Diperoleh hasil yang menunjukkan bahwa penggunaan program DLQs dapat meningkatkan pemahaman mahasiswa.


Keywords


conceptual uderstanding; kinematics; deep learning question programs; pemahaman konsep; kinematika; program deep learning question

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adegoke, B.A. 2011. Effect of Multimedia Instruction On Senior Secondary School Students’ Achievement In Physics.

European Journal of Educational. 3 (3): 537—550.

Arends, R. I. 2012. Learning to Teach: 9th edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Atasoy, B. 2009. The Effect of a Conceptual Change Approach on Understanding of Sudennts’ Chemical Equilibrium

Concept. Journal Research and Science & Technologycal Education. 27: 267—282.

Aufschnaiter, C. & Rogge C. 2010. Misconceptions or Missing Conception?. Eurasian Journal of Mathematics, Science,

&Technology Education. 6 (1): 3—18.

Butler, A.C., & Roediger, H.L. 2008. Feedback enhances the positive effects and reduces the negative effects of multiple-

choice testing. Journal of Science Education and Technology. 36(3): 604—616.

deBoer, J. Kommers, Piet A.M, deBrock, Bert, & Tolboom, Jos. 2014. The influence of prior knowledge and viewing

repertoire on learning from video. Journals Education and Information Technologies, pp1—17.

deCock, M. 2012. Representation Use and Strategy Choice in Physics Problem Solving. Physical Review Special Topic –

Physics Education Research, 8, 020117.

Disessa, A.A., & Sherin, B. L. 2006. What changes in conceptual change? International Journal of Science Education. 20 (10):

—1191.

Docktor, J.L. & Mestre, J.P. 2014. Synthesis of discipline-based education research in physics. Physical Review Special Topic

- Physics Education Research, 10, 020119.

Eshach, H. 2014. Development of a Student-Centered Instrument to Assess Middle School Students’ Conceptual

Understanding of Sound. Physical Review Special Topic - Physics Education Research, 10, 010102.

Fakcharoenphol, Witat., Potter Eric., & Stelzer.2011. What Student Learn When Studying Physics Practice Exam Poblems.

Physical Review Special Topics – Physics Education Research., 7, 010107.

Frank, W. 2012. Interactional Processes for Stabilizing Conceptual Coherences in Physics. Physical Review Special Topic –

Physics Education Research., 8, 020101.

Govender, N. 2013. Physics Student Teachers Mix Of Understandings Of Algebraic Sign Convention In Vector Kinematics: A

Phenomenograpic Perspective. African Journal of Research in SMT Education. 11(1): 61—73.

Hamid, M.S. 2011. Standar Mutu Penilaian dalam Kelas. Yogyakarta: Diva Press.

Hammer, D. 2000. Students resource for learning introductory physics. American Journal of Physics, Physics Education

Research Supplement, 68 (S1), S52—S59

Hedge, B., & Meera, B. N. 2012. How do they solve it? An Insight into the Learner’s Approach to the Mechanism of Physiscs

Problem Solving. Physical Review Special Topic - Physics Education Research., 8, 010102.

Heron, R. L. 2015. Effect of Lecture Instruction on Student Performance on Qualitative Questions. Physical Review Special

Topic - Physics Education Research., 11, 010102.

Hestenes, D.,Wells, M., & Swackhamer, G. 1992. Force Concept Inventory. The Physics Teacher. 30, 141—151.

Ibrahim, B. & Robello, N. S. 2012. Representational Task Format and Problem Solving Strategies in Kinematics and Work.

Physical Review Special Topic - Physics Education Research., 8, 010126.

Irons, A. 2008. Enhancing Learning Through Formative Assessment and Feedback. New York: Taylor & Francase e-Library.

Kapon, S., Ganiel, U., & Eylon, B.S. 2011. Utilizing Public Scientifict Web to Teach Contemporary Physics at the High

School Level: a Case Study of Learning. Physical Review Special Topic - Physics Education Research., 7, 020108.

Keeley, P. & Harrington, R. 2010. Uncovering Student Ideas in Physical Science-45 New Fore and Motion Assessment Probes.

Vol. 1. NSTA Press.

Kopcha, Theodore J & Sullivan, Howard. 2008. Learner Preferences and Prior Knowledge in Learner-Controlled Computer-

Based Instruction. Journal of Science Education and Technology Research. 56: 265—286.

Kustusch, Mary Bridget. 2016. Assessing the Impact of Representational and Contextual Problem Features on Student Use of

Right-Hand Rules. Physical Review Special Topics – Physics Education Research., 12, 010102.

Leech, N. L., Barrett, K.C., & Morgan, G. A. 2005. SPSS for Intermediete Statistic: Use and Interpretation 2nd Edition. New

Jersey: LEA Publishers.

Mason, A & Singh, Chandralekha. 2016. Using Categorization of Problems as an Instructional Tool to Help Introductory

Students Learn Physics. Physics Education Research., 51, 025009.

Maries, A. & Singh, C. (2013). Exploring One Aspect of Pedagogical Content Knowledge of Teaching Assisstants Using The

Test of Understanding Graphs in Kinematics. Physical Review Special Topics – Physics Education Research., 9, 020120.

Morgan, George A., Leech, Nancy L., & Gloeckner, Gene W. 2004. SPSS For Introductory Statistics Use and Interpretation.

New Jersey: LEA Publishers.

Ogilve, C. A. 2009. Changes in students’ problem solving strategies in a course that includes context-rich, multifaceted

problems. Physical Review Special Topics – Physics Education Research., 5, 020102.

Oliveira, P. C. & Oloveira, C. G. 2013. Using Conceptual Questions to Promote Motivation and Learning in Physics Lectures.

European Journal of Engineering Education.

Rosenblatt, R. & Heckler, A.F. 2011. Systematic study of student understanding of the relationships between the directions of force, velocity, and acceleration in one dimension. Physical Review Special Topic - Physics Education Research., 7, 020112.

Ryan, Qing X., Frodermann, Evan., Heller, Kenneth., Hsu, Leonardo & Mason, Andrew. (2016). Computer Problem-Solving

Coaches for Introductory Physics: Design and Usability Studies. Physical Review Special Topics – Physics Education

Research., 12. 010105.

Serway, R. A. & Jewett, J. W. 2014. Physics for Scientist and Enginers. 9th Edition. Thomson Brooks/Cole.

Schroeder, N., Gladding, G., Gutmann, B., & Stelzer, T. 2015. Narrated Animated Solution Videos in A Mastery Setting.

Physical Review Special Topics – Physics Education Research., 11, 010113.

Springuel, R., Wittman, M.C., & Thompson, J.R. 2007. Applying Clustering to Statistical analysis of Student Reasoning

About Two-Dimensional Kinematics. Physical Review Special Topic - Physics Education Research., 3, 020107.

Suparno, P. 2013. Miskonsepsi dan Perubahan Konsep Dalam Pendidikan Fisika. Jakarta: PT. Grasindo.

Sutopo. 2012. Pembelajaran Kinematika Berbasis Diagram Gerak: Cara Baru Dalam Pengajaran Kinematika. Prosiding

Seminar Nasional Penelitian Pendidikan dan Penerapan.

Sutopo., Liliasari., Waldrip, B., & Rusdiana, D. 2011. The prospective physics teachers’ prior knowledge of acceleration and the alternative teaching strategy for better learning outcome. Paper presented on National Seminar of Science Education, Unesa, Surabaya: 10 Desember 2011.

Sutopo & Waldrip, B. 2014. Impact of a Representational Approach on Students’ Reasoning and conceptual Understanding in

Learning Mechanics. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education.

Treagust, D. F., & Duit, R. 2008. Conceptual Change: A Discussion of Theoretical, Methodological and Practical Challenges for Science Education, Handbook on Conceptual Change. Perth: In Press

Zitzewitt, Paul W., Elliott, Todd George., Haase, David G., Harper, Kathleen A., Herzog, Michael R., Nelson, Jane Bray.,

Nelson, Jim., Schuler, Charles A., Zorn, Margaret. 2005. Physics Principles and Problems. McGrow-Hill Companies

Publishers.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jp.v1i3.6170

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2016 Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan




JPtpp is accredited “Rank 2” as a scientific journal under the decree of the Directorate General of Research Enhancement and Development, Ministry of Research, Technology, and Higher Education, dated October 24, 2018, No: 30/E/KPT/2018, effective for five years from Volume 3 Issue 1, 2018 until Volume 7 Issue 8, 2022.


Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan

Journal Of Education

Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang

Lisensi Creative Commons

JPtpp is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License