PENGEMBANGAN LEMBAR KEGIATAN SISWA BERCIRIKAN STRATEGI GENERATIF DENGAN PEMBELAJARAN PMII TIPE CLASSWIDE PEER TUTORING

Wimelia Citra Rahmadani, Abdur Rahman As’ari, Swasono Rahardjo

Abstract


This study aimed to produce students’ worksheets (LKS) of which features are based on generative learning strategy and PMII learning that are valid, interesting and effective. This study was a development study which employed three earlier stages of 4-D (four-D) model proposed by Thiagarajan, Semmel, and Semmel. It included these stages: define, design, and develop. This study was conducted on eighth graders at SMPN 2 Malang. The results of the study showed that the worksheets were valid with an average score of 3.10. Based on the results of the tryout, it was proven that: 1) the average score of students’ questionnaire was high: 3.29. It means that the LKS was appealing to students and 2) the results of the interview conduted to the teacher revealed that the worksheets were quite interesting and applicable. The LKS was also effective. It was seen from the level of students’ mastery (87.5%): the students understand the materials very well with the LKS.

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah menghasilkan LKS bercirikan strategi generatif dengan pembelajaran PMII yang valid, menarik dan efektif. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian pengembangan yang mengadopsi 3 tahap pertama model pengembangan 4-D (four-D) yang dikemukakan oleh Thiagarajan, Semmel dan Semmel yang meliputi tahap pendefinisian (define), perancangan(design), dan pengembangan (develop). Penelitian ini dilaksanakan di SMPN 2 Malang pada siswa Kelas VIII. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa LKS yang dikembangkan valid dengan skor rata-rata 3,10. Berdasarkan hasil uji coba diperoleh: 1) skor rata-rata angket siswa tinggi  yaitu 3,29, sehingga LKS menarik bagi siswa dan 2) hasil wawancara guru disimpulkan bahwa LKS menarik bagi siswa dan dapat digunakan. LKS juga memenuhi aspek keefektifan. Hal ini dapat dilihat dari tingkat ketuntasan siswa yaitu 87,5% artinya pemahaman siswa setelah belajar menggunakan LKS sangat baik.



Keywords


worksheets; generative; PMII; CWPt; LKS; generatif; PMII; CWPT

Full Text:

PDF

References


Antara Jatim. 2015. Siswa SMP Se-Jatim Memiliki Nilai di Bawah Standar. (Online). Tersedia: AntaraJatim.com, diakses September 2015.

Shoimin, A. 2014. Model Pembelajaran Inovatif dalam Kurikulum 2013. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media.

Prastowo, A. 2013. Panduan Kreatif Membuat Bahan Ajar. Yogyakarta: Diva Press.

Depdiknas. 2008. Panduan Pengembangan Bahan Ajar. Jakarta: Depdiknas.

Aqib, Z. 2015. Model-model dan Strategi Pembelajaran Kontekstual. Bandung: Yrama Widya.

Slavin, E. R. 2011. Psikologi Pendidikan Teori dan Praktik. Jakarta: PT Indeks.

Hasan, M. A.Y. 2011. Diagnosisi Kesulitan Siswa dalam Menyederhanakan Pecahan Aljabar dan Upaya Mengatasinya dengan Menggunakan Scaffolding. Tesis tidak diterbitkan. Malang: Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Malang.

Muawwanah, S. 2011. Pengembangan LKS Teorema Phytagoras Bercirikan RME untuk RSMPBI Pacitan. Tesis tidak diterbitkan. Malang: Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Malang.

Yildirim, N. 2011. The Effect Of The Worksheets on Students Achievement In Chemical Equilibrium. Journal of Turkish Science Education. Volume 8, issue 3.

Wena, M. 2012. Strategi Pembelajaran Inovatif Kontemporer. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Taro, F., & Shinya, Y. 2011. The development of children's understanding of mathematical patterns through mathematical activities. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, Vol. 13.

Putri, C. U. 2011. Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Generatif untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep Matematis Siswa Sekolah Menengah Atas. Tesis tidak diterbitkan. Bandung: Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Nurcahyanti. 2011. Pengembangan Modul Matematika Materi Matriks untuk Siswa SMK Negeri 5 Malang. Tesis tidak diterbitkan. Malang: Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Malang.

Block, M. E., Oberweiser, B., & Bain, M. 1995. Using classwide peer tutoring to facilitate inclusion s with disabilities in regular physical education. Physical Educator, 52, 1, 47—56.

Thiagarajan, S. Semmel, D. S, & Semmel, M. I,.1974. Intructional Development for Training Teacher of Exeptional Children. Minnepolis, Minnesota: Leadership Training Institut/Special Education, University of Minnesota.

Corkill, A. J. 1992. Advance organizers: Facilitators of recall. Educational Psychology Review, 4, 3 3-67.

Pressley, M., Wood, E., Woloshyn, V. E., Martin, V., IGng, A.,& Menlte, D. (1992). Encouraging mindful use of prior knowledge: Attempting to construct explanatory answers facilitates learning. Educational Psycholog-ist, 27,9 1-1 09.

Ball. D. L, & Bass H. 2003. Making Mathematics Reasonable In School. Dalam Kilpatrick J, Martin WG, Schifter DE (Eds). A research companion to principles and standars for school mathematics. National Council of Teachers of mathematics, Reston,VA, (hlm.27—44), (Online), (http://www.personal.umich.edu/dball/chapters/BallBassMakingMathReason.pdf), diakses 5 Juni 2016.

NCTM. 2000. Principles and Standars for School Mathematics. Rosewood: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematic, Inc.

Stacey, K., & Vincent, J. 2009. Modes Reasoning in explanations in Australian Eighth-grade Mathematics Textbooks. Educational study in Mathematics, 72: 271—288.

Amir, Z. & Risnawati. 2016. Psikologi Pembelajaran Matematika. Yogyakarta: Aswaja Pressindo.

Dirman. 2014. Kegiatan Pembelajaran yang Mendidik. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.

Kemendikbud. 2015. Panduan Penilaian untuk Sekolah Menengah Pertama (SMP). Jakarta: Kemendikbud.

Rohman, M. 2013. Strategi dan Desain Pengembangan Sistem Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jp.v1i6.6366

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2016 Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan




JPtpp is accredited “Rank 2” as a scientific journal under the decree of the Directorate General of Research Enhancement and Development, Ministry of Research, Technology, and Higher Education, dated October 24, 2018, No: 30/E/KPT/2018, effective for five years from Volume 3 Issue 1, 2018 until Volume 7 Issue 8, 2022.


Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan

Journal Of Education

Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang

Lisensi Creative Commons

JPtpp is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License