Nanik Nurlaela, Hadi Suwono, Sueb Sueb


This study aimed to describe the activity of students in learning and know the differences in cognitive learning outcomes of students in inquiry-science assisted KWL class with confirmatory class. The sampling technique was cluster sampling. The method used were nonrandomized pretest posttest control group design. Experimental class was taught using scientific inquiry model assisted KWL, and control classes taught using confirmatory models. Student activities were analyzed descriptively. Students activities demonstrate grade in learning implementation science inquiry assisted KWL showed 88.4% and confirmatory class showed 88.3%. Data analysis of the cognitive learning using Anacova with SPSS 22 for Windows that had previously been carried out tests of normality and homogeneity. The test results indicate that the F count Anacova generated at 64.619 in p. 0,000 <α (α = 0.05) means that there are differences in the cognitive learning classes taught using science inquiry learning assisted KWL model with confirmatory model with covariate effect on learning outcomes. The conclusions of this research that there are differences in cognitive achievement of students taught using scientific inquiry assisted KWL model with the students taught using confirmatory model with covariate effect on learning outcomes.

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan aktivitas siswa dalam pembelajaran dan mengetahui perbedaan hasil belajar kognitif siswa di kelas inkuiri sains berbantuan KWL dengan kelas konfirmatori. Teknik pengambilan sampel secara  cluster sampling. Metode yang digunakan yaitu nonrandomized control group pretest posttest design. Kelas eksperimen diajar menggunakan model inkuiri sains berbantuan KWL, kelas kontrol diajar menggunakan model konfirmatori. Pelaksanaan pembelajaran kelas inkuiri sains berbantuan KWL menunjukkan sebesar 88,4% dan kelas konfirmatori sebasar 88,3%. Análisis data hasil belajar kognitif menggunakan  anakova dengan bantuan SPSS 22.0 for Windows yang sebelumnya telah dilakukan uji normalitas dan homogenitas. Hasil uji anakova menunjukkan bahwa F hitung yang dihasilkan sebesar 64,619 dengan  p. 0,000< α (α=0,05) artinya  ada perbedaan hasil belajar kognitif  kelas yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran inkuiri sains berbantuan KWL dengan model konfirmatori dengan kovariat berpengaruh terhadap hasil belajar (P<0,055). Simpulan penelitian ini yaitu ada perbedaan hasil belajar kognitif siswa  yang diajar menggunakan model inkuiri sains berbantuan KWL dengan siswa yang diajar menggunakan model konfirmatori dengan variabel kovariat berpengaruh terhadap hasil belajar.   


science inquiry assisted KWL; student activity; cognitive learning outcomes; inkuiri sains berbantuan KWL; aktivitas siswa; hasil belajar kognitif

Full Text:



Abdi, A. 2014. The Effect of Inquiry-based Learning Method on Students’ Academic Achievement in Science Course. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 2 (1):37—41.

Andrini, V S. 2016. The Effectiveness of Inquiry Learning Method to Enhance Students’ Learning Outcome: A Theoritical and Empirical Review. Journal of Education and Practice, 7 (3):38—42.

Fengjuan, Z. 2010. The Integration of the Know-Want-Learn (KWL) Strategy into English Language Teaching for Non-English Majors. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics (Bimonthly), 33 (4):77—86.

Herron, S. 2009. From Cookbook to Collaborative: Transforming a University Biology Laboratory Course. The American Biology Teacher. 71 (9):548—552.

Kuhlthau,C.C. Maniotes, L.K.,& Caspari, A.K. 2007. Guide Inquiry: Learning in the 21st Century. Second edition. London: Libraries Unlimited, Inc.

Leedy, P.D. & Ormond, J.E. 2005. Practical research. Planning and design. 8th Edition. Ohio: Pearson Practice Hall.

Llewellyn, D. 2013. Teaching High School Science Through Inquiry and Argumentation. United Kingdom: SAGE Publication Ltd.

Maxwell, D.O. 2015. Effects of using inquiry-based learning on science achievement for fifth-grade students. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 16 (1):1—31.

Moreillon, J. 2014. Inquiry Learning and Reading Comprehension Strategy Instruction: Processes That Go Hand in Hand. Knowledge Quest. 43 (2):1-4

Ogle, D. 2009. Creating Contexts for Inquiry: from KWL to PRC 2. Knowledge Quest. (38):56—61.

Opara, J.A. 2011. Inquiry Method and Student Academic Achievement in Biology: Lessons and Policy Implications. American-Eurasian Journal of Scientific Research. 6 (1):28—31.

Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 65 Tahun 2013 Tentang Standar Proses Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.

Sanjaya, W. 2006. Strategi Pembelajaran Berorientasi Standar Proses Pendidikan. Jakarta: Kencana Prenadamedia Group.

Smallhorn, M. Young, J. Hunter, N dan Silva, K B. 2015. Inquiry-based learning to improve student engagement in a large first year topic. Student Success, 6 (2):65—77.

Suaidy,H, Utaya, S. & Soetjipto B,E. 2016. The Enhancement of Process Skills and Cognitive Learning

Outcomes of Science in Elementary School Through Inquiry Learning. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSR-JRME). 6 (3):67—71.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 Tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2017 Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan

JPtpp is accredited “Rank 2” as a scientific journal under the decree of the Directorate General of Research Enhancement and Development, Ministry of Research, Technology, and Higher Education, dated October 24, 2018, No: 30/E/KPT/2018, effective for five years from Volume 3 Issue 1, 2018 until Volume 7 Issue 8, 2022.

Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan

Journal Of Education

Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang

Lisensi Creative Commons

JPtpp is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License