PROSES ASIMILASI DAN AKOMODASI DALAM MEMECAHKAN MASALAH MATEMATIKA BERDASARKAN KECERDASAN EMOSIONAL
Abstract
This study aimed to describe students’ thinking process on the 7th grade of junior high school in solving mathematics problem based on the case study of Polya steps for several students on high, medium, and low emotional quotient. This study is qualitative descriptive research. It was done in SMPN 2 Mataram, Nusa Tenggara Barat (NTB). The research findings are students whose emotional quotient is high use assimilation thinking process in identifying the problems, creating the plan of problem solving, doing the plan of problem solving, and reviewing or evaluating the answers. Students’ thinking process whose emotional quotient is medium use assimilation thinking process in identifying the problems, creating the plan of problem solving, and doing the plan; while in reviewing or evaluating the answers, they use accommodation or assimilation thinking process. In addition, students’ thinking process whose emotional quotient is low use assimilation thinking process in identifying the problems, and creating the plan of problem solving; and use accommodation or assimilation thinking process in doing the plan of problem solving. Meanwhile, there is imperfection accommodation thinking process in reviewing or evaluating the answers.
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menggambarkan proses berpikir siswa kelas VII SMP dalam memecahkan masalah matematika berdasarkan langkah Polya studi kasus untuk beberapa siswa dengan kecerdasan emosional tinggi, sedang, dan rendah. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian deskriptif kualitatif. Penelitian ini dilaksanakan di SMPN 2 Mataram Nusa Tenggara Barat (NTB). Hasil penelitian ini adalah siswa dengan kecerdasan emosional tinggi dalam memahami masalah, merencanakan penyelesaian, melaksanakan penyelesaian, dan melihat kembali melakukan proses berpikir asimilasi. Proses berpikir siswa dengan kecerdasan emosional sedang dalam memahami masalah, merencanakan masalah, dan melaksanakan rencana penyelesaian melakukan proses berpikir asimilasi, sedangkan untuk melihat kembali melakukan proses berpikir akomodasi atau asimilasi. Kemudian untuk siswa dengan kecerdasan emosional rendah dalam memahami masalah melakukan proses berpikir asimilasi, dalam merencanakan penyelesaian melakukan proses berpikir asimilasi, dalam melaksakan rencana penyelesaian melakukan proses berpikir akomodasi dan asimilasi, sedangkan dalam melihat kembali melakukan proses berpikir akomodasi tidak sempurna.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Baker, W., Ye, R., Doyle, K.M. & Czarnocha, B. 2011. Problem Solving in Pre-Algebra and College Level. Mathematics Teaching Research Journal (Online), 4 (3):27—58.
Berrocal, P.F. & Ruiz, D. 2008. Emotional Intelligence in Education. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 6 (2):421—436.
Depdiknas .2006. Permendiknas No 22 Tahun 2006 Tentang Standar Isi. Jakarta: Depdiknas.
Festus, A.B. 2012. The Relationship between Emotional Intelligence and Academic Achievement of Senior Secondary School Students in the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja. Journal of Education and Practice Vol 3, No 10, 2012. www.iiste.org.
Goleman, D. 2005. Kepemimpinan Berdasarkan Kecerdasan Emosional. Terjemahan Alex Tri Kantjono 2005. Jakarta: Gramedia.
Goleman, D. 2000. Emotional intelegence. Terjemahan T. Hermaya. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Lester, F.K.1994. Musing About Mathematical Problem-Solving Research:1970-1994. Journal for Research in Mathematical Education. 25:660—675.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. 2000. Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston: NCTM
Nurnaningsih. 2011. Bimbingan Kelompok untuk Meningkatkan Kecerdasan Emosional Siswa. www. jurnal.upi.edu/. Vol 1. 2011. ISSN 1412-565X.
Orton, A. 1992. Learning Mathematics: Issue, Theory, And Classroom Practice. New York.
Parker, J.D, Cerque, R.E, Barnhat, D.L, Harris, J.I, Majeski, S.A, Wood, L.M, Barbara, B.J, Hogan, M.J.2004. Academic Acheivemant in High School: does Emottion Inttelegance Matter?, journal personality and individual Differences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, Elsever Ltd.
Polya, G. 2004. How to Solve it. A new aspect of matematicalmethod. Princeten and Oxford: Princten University Press.
Siswono, T.Y.E. 2008. Model Pembelajaran Matematika Berbasis Pengajuan dan Pemecahan Masalah untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif. Makalah Simposium. Surabaya: Unesa.
Stein J. S & Book H.E. 2002. Ledakan EQ. Terjemahan Trinanda Rainy Januarsari. Bandung: Kaifa.
Supriadi, D.M & Sri Subanti. 2015. Analisis Proses Berpikir Siswa Dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika Berdasarkan Langkah Polya Ditinjau dari Kecerdasan Emosional Siswa Kelas VII SMP Al-Azhar Syifa Budi Tahun Pelajaran 2013/2014. Jurnal Elektronik Pembelajaran Matematika. PPS Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta.
Xin, Y.P. 2007. Word Problem Solving Tasks in Textbook and Their Relation to Student Performance. The Journal of Education Research, 100 (6):347—360.
Yeo, J.K.K.2004. Secondary 2 Students Difficult in Solving Noun Routine Problems. Singapura: Nanyang Technological University.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v2i5.8999
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2017 Eka Kurniawan, Sri Mulyati, Swasono Rahardjo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan Journal of Education: Theory, Research, and Development Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang JPtpp is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License |