PENERAPAN METODE PENEMUAN TERBIMBING DI KELAS VIII SMP

Toni Hidayat, Sri Mulyati, Abd. Qohar

Abstract


This study was a classroom action research which aims to investigate how the implementation of guided discovery learning can improve students’ activeness and attainment in the class VIII of Laboraturium UM Senior High School Malang city. The study subject was Class VIII that consists of 36 students, year 2016/2017. This study consisted of two cycles, and the data was collected from the result of the final test, observation, and interview. Based on the research of cycle I, the students’ activeness with mean scores of the meeting I, II, III was 78.88%, 79%, 86.6% respectively. The students’ activeness on cycle II, the mean scores of analyst meeting V and VI were 89.22% and 92.24% respectively. The result of Mathematics learning was increased, it is shown on the test mean of the cycle I that was achieved by 36 students with the percentage of successful learning 83 %. On the cycle test II, the average of 36 gained 82 (score) with 7.2 increased from the score mean of the cycle I and with classical mastery learning cycle II 88.88%.

Penelitian ini merupakan Penelitian Tindakan Kelas (PTK) yang bertujuan untuk mengetahui bagaimana penerapan metode penemuan terbimbing yang dapat meningkatan keaktifan dan hasil belajar siswa kelas VIII SMP Laboratorium UM Kota Malang. Subjek penelitian ini ialah siswa kelas VIII yang berjumlah 36 siswa tahun pelajaran 2016/2017. Penelitian ini terdiri atas dua siklus dan data dikumpulkan dari hasil tes akhir tindakan, observasi, dan wawancara. Berdasarakan hasil penelitian pada siklus I, keaktifan siswa siswa dengan skor rata-rata pertemuan I, II, III adalah 78,88% 79,%, dan 86,6%. Aktivitas siswa pada siklus II, rata-rata skor pengamat pertemuan V dan VI berturut-turut 89,22 % dan 92,24%. Hasil belajar matematika siswa meningkat, hal ini terlihat bahwa rata-rata tes siklus I yang diperoleh 36 siswa sebesar 74,8 dengan presentase keberhasilan belajar 83,33%. Pada tes siklus II rata-rata nilai menjadi 82 dengan peningkatan sebesar 7,2 dari rata-rata nilai siklus I dan dengan ketuntasan belajar klasikal siklus II 88,88%.


Keywords


guided discovery; learning; penemuan terbimbing; pembelajaran

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abadzi, H. 1987. Ability Grouping Effects on Academic Achievement and Self Esteem: Who Performsin the Long Run as Expected. Journal of Education Research. (Online), 79 (1):36—40, (http://psych.wisc.edu/henriques/papers/abadzi.pdf, diakses 20 November 2016).

Arikunto, S, dkk. 2009. Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Arikunto, S. 2006. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Baumslag. 2000. Fundamental of Teaching Mathematics at University Level. London: Imperial College Press.

Daryanto. 2009. Panduan Proses Pembelajaran Kreatif dan Inovatif. Jakarta: AV Publisher.

Daryanto. 2014. Penelitian tindakan kelas dan peneltian tindakan sekolah. Yogyakarta: Gava Media.

Grows, D. 2000. Improving Student Achievement in Mathematics. Brusels: PCL, Lausanne.

Hudojo, H. 2005. Pengembangan Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran Matematika. Malang: Universitas Negeri Malang.

Markaban. 2008. Model Penemuan terbimbing pada Pembelajaran Matematika SMK. Yogyakarta: Pusat Pengembangan dan Pemberdayaan Pendidik dan Tenaga Kependidikan Matematika.

Nurhadi. 2004. Pembelajaran Konstekstual dan Penerapannya dalam KBK. Malang: UM Press.

Orthon, A. 1992. Learning Mathematics: Issues, Theory and Classroom Practice (second edition). New York: Dotesios.

Palmer, D. 2007. What Is the Best Way to Motivate Student in Science? Teaching Science-The Journal of the Australian Science Teachers Association. (Online), 38-42, (http://connections.ebschohost.com/what-best-way-motivate-students-science, diakses 15 Novemper 2016).

Roestiyah. 1998. Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.

Ruseffendi, E.T. 1988. Pengantar kepada membantu guru mengembangkan kompetensinya dalam pendidikan matematika untuk meningkatkan CBSA. Bandung: Tarsito.

Santrock, J. W. 2003. Adolesence Perkembangan Remaja. Terjemahan Oleh Sherly Saragih. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Slavin, E R. 1994. Education Psychology Theory and Practice (fourth edition). Boston: Allin and Bacon.

Sudjana, N. 2009. Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Sudjana, N. 2001. Metode dan Teknik Pembelajaran Partisipasif. Bandung: Falah Production.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v2i8.9882

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Toni Hidayat, Sri Mulyati, Abd. Qohar

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


JPtpp is accredited “Rank 2” as a scientific journal under the decree of the Directorate General of Research Enhancement and Development, Ministry of Research, Technology, and Higher Education, dated October 24, 2018, No: 30/E/KPT/2018, effective for five years from Volume 3 Issue 1, 2018 until Volume 7 Issue 8, 2022.


Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan

Journal Of Education

Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang

Lisensi Creative Commons

JPtpp is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License