Import Components and Import Multipliers in Indonesian Economy: World Input-Output Analysis
Abstract
This paper calculates, presents and discusses on import components and the impact of final demand change on Indonesian imports using Indonesian 36 sector input-output tables of years: 2000, 2005, 2010 and 2014 from World Input-Output Tables. The results showed that firstly, Indonesian import components of input were, on average, more than 20 percent; meaning that input that locally provided were less than 80 percent. Secondly, Indonesian import of input had increased significantly from US$ 36,011 million in 2000 to US$ 151,505 million in 2014. Thirdly, Indonesian imports have been dominated by Sector-3: Manufacture of food products, beverages and tobacco products, Sector-4: Manufacture of textiles, wearing apparel and leather products, Sector-24: Construction, Sector-25: Wholesale and retail trade and repair, and Sector-26: Transportation and post services. Fourthly, by country of origin, Indonesian imports have been dominated by Japan, Korea, the USA, Australia, and China. Imports from Australia, Japan, and the US have been decreased significantly, but import from China has steadily increased. Finally, highest sectoral import multipliers occurred if final demands change in Sector-1: Crop and animal production, forestry, fishing and aquaculture, Sector-2: Mining and quarrying, Sector-23: Water collection; sewerage; waste collection, treatment and disposal activities, and Sector-30: Real estate activities, but there was no significant difference of import multipliers for country origin of import.
Keywords: import components, sectoral import multiplier, spatial import multiplier.
JEL Classification: C67, D57, F17
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adhi, A. (2015). 80 Persen Industri Indonesia Disebut Dikuasai Swasta. Retrieved from http://surabaya.tribunnews.com/2015/03/03/80-persen-industri-indo nesia-disebut-dikuasai-swasta.
Ahiakpor, J.C.W. (2000). Hawtrey on the Keynesian Multiplier: A Question of Cognitive Dissonance? History of Political Economy, 32 (4): 889-908.
Beemiller, R.M. (1990). Improving Accuracy by Combining Primary Data with RIMS: Comment on Bourque. International Regional Science Review, 13 (1-2): 99-101.
BPS. (2013). Statistic of Maritime and Coastal Resources 2013. Jakarta: Badan Pusat Statistik.
Burda, W. (2005). Macroeconomics: A European Text. Fourth Edition, Oxford University Press.
Coughlin, C. and Mandelbaum, T.B. (1991). A Consumer's Guide to Regional Economic Multipliers. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, January/February 1991:19-32.
Dornbusch, R and Stanley, F. (1994). Macroeconomics. Sixth Edition. International Edition, McGraw-Hill.
Grady, P. and Muller, R. A. (1988). On the use and misuse of input-output based impact analysis in evaluation. The Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 2 (3): 49-61.
Hall, R. E. (2009). By How Much Does GDP Rise if the Government Buys More Output? NBER Working Paper 15496. National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved from: http://www.nber.org/papers/w15496.pdf?new_window=1
Harris, P. (1997). Limitations on the use of regional economic impact multipliers by practitioners: An application to the tourism industry. The Journal of Tourism Studies, 8(2): 1-12.
Hughes, D. W. (2003). Policy uses of economic multipliers and impact analysis. Choices Publication of the American Agricultural Economics Association, Second Quarter. Retrieved from: http://www.choicesmagazine.org/2003-2/2003-2-06.htm
Isard, W. (1951). Inter-regional and Regional Input-Output Analysis: A Model of a Space-Economy. Review of Economics and Statistics, 33(4): 318-328.
Jensen, R.C. Mandeville, T.D. & Karunaratne, N.D. (1979). Regional Economic Planning: Generation of Regional Input-Output Analysis, Croom Helm, and London.
Joshi, R. M. (2009). International Business. Oxford University Press, New Delhi and New York ISBN 0-19-568909-7.
Kahn, R. (1931). The Relation of Home Investment to Unemployment. Economic Journal, 41(162):173-198. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2223697
Krugman, P. & Wells, R. (2009). Economics, Worth Publisher, Duffield, UK.
Leontief, W.W. (1951). The Structure of American Economy 1919-1939. Second Edition, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Lequiller, F., & Blades, D. (2006). Understanding National Accounts. Paris: OECD. pp. 139-143. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/std/UNA-2014.pdf
Mankiw, N.G. (2008). Macroeconomics. Eight Edition, South-Western Publishing, Ohio, the USA.
McConnell, C., Brue, S., and Flynn, S. (2011), Macroeconomics. McGraw-Hill Series Economics, 19th Edition. ISBN-13: 978-0077337728, ISBN-10: 0077337727.
Mills, E. C. (1993). The Misuse of Regional Economic Models. Cato Journal, 13(1): 29-39.
Miller, R. & Blair, P. (1985). Input-Output Analysis – Foundations and Extensions. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
Moore, F.T. and Petersen, J. (1955). Regional Analysis: An Inter-industry Model of Utah. Review of Economics and Statistics, 37: 368-383.
Muchdie, M. (2017a). Technical and Trade Coefficients in Indonesian and Australian Economies: A Comparison. Global Journal for Research Analysis, 6(11), 290-296. DOI: 10.15373/22778160.
Muchdie, M. (2017b). Technical and Trade Coefficients in South Korean and Japanese Economies: Are They the Same? International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 6(11), 677-686. DOI: 10.21275/ART2017 8023.
Muchdie, M., & Sugema. (2017). Technical and Trade Coefficients in China and in the USA Economies: Are They Different? International Journal of Advanced Research, 5(11), 377-390. DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/5780.
Oosterhaven, J., & Stelder, D. (2007), Regional and Interregional IO Analysis. Faculty of Economics and Business University of Groningen, the Netherlands, Retrieved from https://www.rug.nl/research/reg/research/ irios/download/regional-io-analysis.pdf.
Pindyck, R., and Rubinfeld, D. (2012). Macroeconomics. The Pearson Series in Economics, 8th Edition, ISBN13:978-0132857123, ISBN-10: 013285712X
Richardson, H.W. (1985). Input-Output and Economic Base Multipliers: Looking Backward and Forward. Journal of Regional Science, 25 (4): 607-661.
Siegfried, J., Allen R., Sanderson, A.R., and McHenry, P. (2006). The Economic Impact of Colleges and Universities. Working Paper No. 06-W12, Retrieved from http://www.accessecon.com/pubs/VUECON/vu06-w12.pdf.
Tiebout, C.M. (1956). A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures. The Journal of Political Economy, 64(5): 416-424.
Timmer, M. P., Los, B., Stehrer, R., and de Vries, G. J. (2016). An Anatomy of the Global Trade Slowdown based on the WIOD 2016 Release. GGDC research memorandum number 162, University of Groningen, retrieved from http://www.ggdc.net/ publications/memorandum/gd162.pdf.
Timmer, M.P., Dietzenbacher, E., Los, B., Stehrer, R., & de Vries, G.J. (2015). An Illustrated User Guide to the World Input–Output Database: the Case of Global Automotive Production. Review of International Economics, 23(3), 575–605. DOI:10.1111/roie.1217.
Tradingeconomics. (2017). Indonesian import, Tradingeconomics.com on Indonesian imports, Retrieved from: https://www.tradingeconomics.com/indonesia/imports.
Trinh, B., Hoa, P. L., & Giang, B.C. (2008). Import multiplier in input-output analysis. Depocen Working Paper Series No. 2008/23.
West, G.R. (1990). Regional Trade Estimation: A Hybrid Approach. International Regional Science Review, 13 (1&2), 103-118.
Worldbank. (2017). The World Bank In Indonesia: Having Maintained Political Stability, Indonesia is one of Asia Pasific’s Most Vibrant Democracies and Is Emerging as a Confident Middle-Income Country. Retrieved from http://www.worldbank.org/en/country/indonesia/overview.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um002v10i12018p088
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
ISSN: 2086-1575 E-ISSN: 2502-7115
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.