Antecedent and Anaphora: A Window into EFL Students' Linguistic Development

Nurhaliza Hasan, Sisca Bochari, Maf’ulah Maf’ulah, Wahyudin Wahyudin

Abstract


This study investigates the understanding and challenges of using antecedents and anaphors in sentences made by English as a foreign language (EFL) students at Tadulako University, focusing on nominal antecedent and pronominal antecedent (indefinite pronouns, quantifiers, demonstrative pronouns, and distributive pronoun), pronominal anaphora and adjectival anaphora. The purpose of this study is to identify which element is more difficult between antecedent and anaphora used by EFL students as well as what factors affect their difficulty. This study used a quantitative descriptive approach, with data collected through tests and questionnaires from 148 third-semester students. The results show that antecedent usage is more difficult compared to anaphora, especially in pronominal antecedents, particularly in distributive pronouns, with the mistake rate reaching 93%, while anaphora only recorded 7% mistakes. The main difficulties experienced by students in using antecedents and anaphors are influenced by seven factors, namely: 1) Health Condition, 2) Learning Interest, 3) Motivation, 4) Learning Habits, 5) Teacher Influence, 6) Learning Media, and 7) Classroom Condition. The findings provide important insights for English educators to design more effective teaching strategies in improving students' understanding and writing skills, especially in the use of antecedent and anaphora.

Keywords


antecedent; anaphor; syntax

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahmad, N., Astifar Alias, F., & Abdul Razak, A. (2023). Understanding Population and Sample in Research: Key Concepts for Valid Conclusions. EMBRACE E-LEARNING DIVERSITY FOR FUTURE INNOVATION TRENDS, 6, 19–24.

Babbie, E. (2021). The Practice of Social Research (Fifteenth). Orange: Cengage

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Mixed Methods Procedures. In Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (fifth). New Delhi: Sage.

Gottems, L. B. D., Carvalho, E. M. P. De, Guilhem, D., & Pires, M. R. G. M. (2018). Good practices in normal childbirth : reliability analysis of an instrument by Cronbach’s Alpha. RLAE Revista Latino-Americana de Entermagem, 26. https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.2234.3000

Jamilah, A. S., Agnes, L., & Nisa, L. N. K. (2023). Anaphoric and Cataphoric References Used in “The Chapel” Short Story. English Education and Literature Journal, 4(2), 68–75. https://doi.org/10.47701/frasa.v4i2.2910

Joshi, A., Kale, S., Chandel, S., & Pal, D. K. (2015). Likert Scale : Explored and Explained. 7(4), 396–403. https://doi.org/10.9734/BJAST/2015/14975

Noor, S., Tajik, O., & Golzar, J. (2022). Simple Random Sampling. Sampling of Populations: Methods and Applications: Fourth Edition, 1(December), 43–81. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470374597.ch3

Ramzan, M., & Alahmadi, A. (2024). The Effect of Syntax Instruction on the Development of Complex Sentences in ESL Writing. World Journal of English Language, 14(4), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v14n4p25

Sa’adah, A. R. (2020). Writing Skill in Teaching English: An Overview. EDUCASIA: Jurnal Pendidikan, Pengajaran, Dan Pembelajaran, 5(1), 21–35. https://doi.org/10.21462/educasia.v5i1.41

Sae, J. F. K., Laba, I. N., & Dewi, N. L. D. S. (2022). Anaphora and Cataphora References in Netflix Series Locke and Key. Jakadara: Jurnal Ekonomika, Bisnis, Dan Humaniora, 1(2), 129–136

Sultoni, Gunawan, I., & Sari, D. N. (2019). Validity and Reliability of Character Education Internalization Instruments. Advances in Social Science, Education, and Humanities Research, 381(CoEMA), 245–249.

Telaumbanua, Y., Martini, & Aulia, D. (2019). “Antecedent and Postcedent”: A Syntactic Study of the “ABC’s Principles” of the Binding Theory in the EFL Students’ Written Discourses. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation (IJLLT), 2(6), 214–225. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijllt.2019.2.6.25

Yuqing, X. (2019). Analysis on Semantic Relations of English Nominal Anaphora. 347(Icedem), 12–15. https://doi.org/10.2991/icedem-19.2019.4




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um011v13i22025p79-86

Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Pendidikan Humaniora

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.