Zamzami Zainuddin, Cut Muftia Keumala


Abstract: This article aims to explore the potential development of a Blended learning model in Indonesian higher education institutions. The paper attempts to explain the concept of the Blended learning in terms of theory and practice, based on the literature discussed in several reputable international journals. Initially, this method proposes to improve the deficiencies of a traditional learning model which is lack of technological resources and at the same time to improve the gap of e-learning practice which is lack of a face-to-face learning experience. In the blended instruction, students will learn through a face-to-face interaction in the classroom and supported by learning media such as a Website, Video or Learning Management System (LMS). Meanwhile, the use of technologies is ordinarily used for students’ learning and peers interaction outside of class, especially for online discussion and homework submission. This method emphasizes that learning activity should not only occur in the classroom but also outside of the class through online media.
Key Words: blended learning, hybrid learning, learning management systems, e-learning, conventional learning

Abstrak: Tuliskan Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menggali potensi pengembangan metode pembelajaran Blended learning pada perguruan tinggi Indonesia. Tulisan mencoba memaparkan konsep pembelajaran Blended learning dari segi teori dan praktik berdasarkan literatur dari beberapa jurnal internasional bereputasi. Lahirnya metode ini bertujuan untuk menyempurnakan kekurangan dari metode pembelajaran konvensional face-to-face yang tidak menggunakan media teknologi dalam pembelajaran, serta kekurangan pada metode pembelajaran e-learning  yang mengesampingkan pembelajaran tatap muka. Dalam metode ini siswa akan belajar secara tatap muka di kelas yang didukung oleh berbagai media pembelajaran seperti website, video, dan Learning Management System (LMS). Dalam praktiknya, penggunaan media teknologi sebenarnya lebih banyak digunakan untuk proses pembelajaran di luar kelas terutama untuk diskusi online dan mengumpulkan tugas. Metode ini menekankan bahwa pembelajaran bukan hanya terjadi di kelas saja secara tatap muka, tetapi juga di luar kelas melalui media online.
Kata kunci: blended learning, hybrid learning, learning management systems, e-learning, pembelajaran konvensional


blended learning; hybrid learning; learning management systems; e-learning

Full Text:



Adiwaluyo, E. (2013, April 29). Banda Aceh: Antara Warung Kopi dan Internet Gratis. Retrieved August 24, 2015, from dan-internet-gratis.html.

Asfar, N., & Zainuddin, Z. (2015). Secondary students’ perceptions of information, communication, and technology (ICT) use in promoting self-directed learning in Malaysia. The Online Journal of Distance Education and E-Learning, 3(4), 67–82.

Bristol, T. (2014). Flipping the classroom. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 9(1), 43–46.

Carini, R. M., Kuh, G. D., & Klein, S. P. (2006). Student engagement and student learning: Testing the linkages. Research in Higher Education, 47(1), 1–32.

Dalsgaard, C., & Godsk, M. (2007). Transforming traditional lectures into problem-based Blended learning: challenges and experiences. Open Learning, 22(1), 29–42.

Firmansyah, E. O., & Nugrahandika, W. H. (2014). Pemanfaatan Warung Kopi Sebagai Ruang Publik Di Kota Banda Aceh (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta.

Fisher, D. (2009). The use of instructional time in the typical high school classroom. The Educational Forum, 73(2), 168–176.

Freeman, S., O’Connor, E., Parks, J. W., Cunningham, M., Hurley, D., Haak, D., ...& Wenderoth, M. P. (2007). Prescribed active learning increases performance in introductory biology. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 6(2), 132–139.

Fu, J. S. (2013). ICT in Education: A Critical Literature Review and Its Implications. International Journal of Education & Development using Information & Communication Technology, 9(1), 112–125.

Garcia, E., Brown, M., & Elbeltagi, I. (2012). The Changing Roles of Staff and Student within a Connectivist Educational Blog Model. Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on E-Learning, 165.

Gebre, E., Saroyan, A., & Bracewell, R. (2014). Students’ engagement in technology-rich classrooms and its relationship to professors’ conceptions of effective teaching. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(1), 83–96.

Graham, C. R., Henrie, C. R., & Gibbons, A. S. (2014). Developing models and theory for Blended learning research. In A. G. Picciano, C. D. Dziuban, & C. R. Graham (Eds.), Blended learning: Research perspectives, volume 2 (pp.13–33). New York, NY: Routledge.

Güzer, B., & Caner, H. (2014). The past, present, and future of Blended learning: an in-depth analysis of literature. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 4596–4603.

Halili, S. H., & Zainuddin, Z. (2015). Flipping the Classroom: What we know and what we don’t. The Online Journal of Distance Education and e Learning, 3(1), 28–35.

Halili, S. H., Razak, R. A., & Zainuddin, Z. (2015, December). Exploring the use of ‘Wiggio’to support online col-laborative learning for adult learners. In Economics, Social Sciences and Information Management: Proceedings of the 2015 International Congress on Economics, Social Sciences and Information Management (ICESSIM 2015), 28–29 March 2015, Bali, Indonesia (p. 15). CRC Press.

Hwang, G. J., & Chen, C. H. (2017). Influences of an inquiry based ubiquitous gaming design on students’ learning achievements, motivation, behavioral patterns, and tendency towards critical thinking and problem-solving. British Journal of Educational Technolo-gy, 48(4), 950–971.

Kanuka, H., & Anderson, T. (2007). Online social interchange, discord, and knowledge construction. International Journal of E-learning & Distance Education, 13(1), 57–74.

Krasnova, T., & Demeshko, M. (2015). Tutor-mediated support in Blended learning. Procedia-social and behavioral sciences, 166, 404–408.

Kuo, Y. C., Belland, B. R., Schroder, K. E., & Walker, A. E. (2014). K-12 teachers’ perceptions of and their satisfaction with interaction type in Blended learning environments. Distance Education, 35(3), 360–381.

Majumdar, S. (2012). Web 2.0 tools in Library Web Pages: Survey of universities and institutes of the national importance of West Bengal. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 32(2), 167–170.

McLaughlin, J. E., Griffin, L. M., Esserman, D. A., Davidson, C. A., Glatt, D. M., Roth, M. T., ... & Mumper, R. J. (2013). Pharmacy student engagement, performance, and perception in a flipped satellite classroom. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Educa-tion, 77(9), 1–8.

Missildine, K., Fountain, R., Summers, L., & Gosselin, K. (2013). Flipping the classroom to improve student performance and satisfaction. Journal of Nursing Education, 52(10), 597–599.

Mortera-Gutiérrez, F. (2006). Faculty best practices using Blended learning in learning and face-to-face instruction. International Journal on E-learning, 5(3), 313–337.

Nguyen, T. C. (2010). Challenges of learning English in Australia towards students coming from selected Southeast Asian countries: Vietnam, Thailand, and Indonesia. International Education Studies, 4(1), 13–20.

O’Connor, C., Mortimer, D., & Bond, S. (2011). Blended learning: Issues, benefits, and challenges. International Journal of Employment Studies, 19(2), 63–83.

Oliver, K., & Stallings, D. (2014). Preparing teachers for emerging Blended learning environments. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 22(1), 57–81.

Pempek, T. A., Yermolayeva, Y. A., & Calvert, S. L. (2009). College students’ social networking experiences on Facebook. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30(3), 227–238.

Poon, J. (2014). A cross-country comparison on the use of Blended learning in property education. Property Management, 32(2), 154–175.

Porter, W. W., Graham, C. R., Spring, K. A., & Welch, K. R. (2014). Blended learning in higher education: Institutional adoption and implementation. Computers & Education, 75, 185–195.

Richter, T., & McPherson, M. (2012). Open educational resources: education for the world? Distance Education, 33(2), 201–219.

Schmidt, S. M., & Ralph, D. L. (2014). The Flipped Classroom: A Twist On Teaching. In The Clute Institute Interna-tional Academic Conference, San Antonio, Texas, USA (pp. 98–104).

Staker, H., & Horn, M. B. (2012). Classifying K-12 Blended learning. Innosight Institute.

Sugiharto, B. (2016, January). The profile of the Utilization of Information and Communication Technology and Its Potency for Blended learning Development in Biology Education Department of Teacher Training and Education Faculty of UNS. Proceeding Biology Education Conference: Biology, Science, Environmental, and Learning (Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 611–617).

Sun, P. C., Tsai, R. J., Finger, G., Chen, Y. Y., & Yeh, D. (2008). What drives a successful e-learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learn-er satisfaction. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1183–1202.

Wang, S., & Heffernan, N. (2010). Ethical issues in Computer-Assisted Language Learning: Perceptions of teachers and learners. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(5), 796–813.

Woo, K., Gosper, M., McNeill, M., Preston, G., Green, D., & Phillips, R. (2008). Web-based lecture technologies: blurring the boundaries between face-to-face and distance learning. Research in Learning Technolo-gy, 16(2). 81–93.

Zainuddin, Z. (2015). Exploring the Potential of Blended learning and Learning Management Systems (LMS) for Higher Education in Aceh. English Journal, 2(2), 70–85.

Zainuddin, Z. (2017). First-Year College Students’ Experiences in the EFL Flipped Classroom: A Case Study in Indonesia. International Journal of Instruction, 10(1), 133–150.

Zainuddin, Z., & M. Attaran. 2015. “Malaysian Students’ Perceptions of Flipped Classroom: A Case Study.” Innovations in Education and Teaching Interna-tional, 53(6), 660–670.

Zainuddin, Z., & S. H. Halili. 2016. “Flipped Classroom Research and Trends from Different Fields of Study.” The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning IRRODL, 17(3), 313–340.

Copyright (c) 2018 Jurnal Pendidikan Humaniora

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Pendidikan Humaniora

Education Journal Of Social Sciences

Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang

Lisensi Creative Commons

JPH is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License