Email this article EFL STUDENTS’ PREFERENCES FOR ORAL CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK IN SPEAKING INSTRUCTION
Abstract
Abstract: This study investigates Indonesian EFL learners’ corrective feedback preferences including the timing, types of error, strategies of corrective feedback, and providers of error correction; and the relationship between foreign language anxiety and preferences for corrective feedback among students. Two hundred fifty seven EFL English department undergraduate students from two different course grades participated in the survey. The data were collected through questionnaire as the main data and interview as the supplementary data. The students’ were assigned to either a low anxiety group or a high anxiety group. The results showed that both sophomore students and freshman students agreed that student errors should be treated; freshman students and sophomore students had significantly similar opinions about perception, types, strategies, and providers of error correction.
Key Words: students’ preference, corrective feedback, speaking instruction
Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengungkap pilihan siswa terhadap umpan balik korektif yang termasuk waktu umpan balik korektif, tipe kesalahan umpan balik korektif, strategi umpan balik korektif, dan pemberi umpan balik korektif. Dua ratus lima puluh tujuh mahasiswa Bahasa Inggris dari dua tahun kelas yang berbeda ikut serta dalam penelitian berbentuk survey. Data kuantitatif diperoleh menggunakan kuesioner sebagai data utama dan interview sebagai data tambahan. Hasil pengolahan data menunjukkan bahwa kedua tingkat kelas siswa baik dari mahasiswa baru dan juga mahasiswa tahun kedua memiliki persamaan penilaian terhadap umpan balik korektif, mereka setuju bahwa kekeliruan segera dikoreksi; mahasiswa baru dan mahasiswa tahun kedua memberikan persamaan penilaian yang signifikan tentang persepsi, tipe, strategi, dan juga pemberi umpan balik korektif.
Kata kunci: pilihan siswa, umpan balik korektif, instruksi berbicara
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Allwright, D., & Bailey, K.M. (1991). Focus on the language classroom: An introduction to classroom research for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ancker, W. (2000). Errors and corrective feedback: Updated theory and classroom practice. English Teaching Forum, 38(4), 20–24.
Brown, A. (2009). Students’ and teachers’ perceptions of effective foreign language teaching: A comparison of ideals. The Modern Language Journal, 93, 46–60.
Brown, H.D. (2000). Principles of language learning and teaching (4th Ed.) White Plains, NY: Longman.
Burt, H.D. (1975). Error analysis in the adult EFL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 9(1), 53–63.
Carpenter, H., Jeon, K., Macgregor, D., & Mackey, A. (2006). Learners’ interpretation of recasts. Studies in Sec-ond Language Acquisition, 28, 209–236.
Chaudron, C. (1977). A description model of discourse in the corrective treatment of learners’ errors. Lan-guage Learning, 27, 29–46.
Cheng, Y., Horwitz, E., & Schallert, D. (1999). Language anxiety differentiating writing and speaking compo-nents. Language Learning, 49(3), 417–446.
Corder, S. (1967). The significance of learners’ errors. Inter-national Review of Applied Linguistics, 5, 161–167.
Doughty, C., & Varela, E. (Eds.). (1998). Communicative fo-cus on form. In C. Doughty & J. Williams. Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 114–138). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Egi, T. (2007). Interpreting recasts as linguistic evidence: The roles of length and degree of change. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29, 511–537.
Ellis, R., Basturkmen, H., & Lowen, S. (2001). Learner uptake in communicative ESL lessons. Language Learn-ing, 51(2), 281–318.
Ellis, R., & Sheen, Y. (2006). Re-examining the role of recasts in L2 acquisition. Studies in Second Language Ac-quisition, 28(4), 575–600.
Fukuda, Y. (2004). Treatment of spoken errors in Japanese high school oral communication classes. (Master’s thesis, California State University, San Francisco.
Hendrickson, J. (1978). Error correction in foreign language teaching: Recent theory, research, and practice. The Modern Language Journal, 62, 387–398.
Horwitz, E. K. (1988). The beliefs about language learning of beginning university foreign language students. The Modern Language Journal, 72, 283–294.
Horwitz, E., Horwitz, B., & Cope, J. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, 70, 125–132.
In’nami, Y. (2006). The effects of test anxiety on listening test performance. System, 34, 317–340.
Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second lan-guage acquisition. New York: Pergamon Press Inc.
Krashen, S. (1998). Comprehensible output? System, 26, 175–182.
Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (1999). How language are learned. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W.C. Ritchi & T.K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). San Diego: Academic Press.
Long, M. H., Inagaki, S., & Ortega, L. (1998). The role of im-plicit negative feedback in SLA: Models and recasts in Japanese and Spanish. The Modern Language Journal, 82(3), 357–371.
Long, M. H., & Robinson, P. (1998). Focus on form: Theory, research, and practice. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second lan-guage acquisition (pp. 15–41). Cambridge: Cam-bridge University Press.
Lyster, R. (1998). Negotiation of form, recasts, and explicit correction in relation to error types and learner repair in immersion classrooms. Language Learning, 48(2), 183–218.
Lyster, R. (2004). Differential effects of prompts and recasts in form-focused instruction. Studies in Second Lan-guage Acquisition, 26, 399–432.
Lyster, R., & Panova, I. (2002). Patterns of corrective feed-back and uptake in an adult ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 36(4), 573–595.
Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learn-er uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisi-tion, 19, 37–66.
MacIntyre, P., & Gardner, R. (1989). Anxiety and second language learning: Toward a theoretical clarification. Language Learning, 39, 251–275.
MacIntyre, P., & Gardner, R. (1994). The subtle effects of induced anxiety on
cognitive processing in the second language. Language Learning, 44, 283–305.
Mackey, A., Gass, S., & McDonough, K. (2000). How do learners perceive interactional feedback? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22(4), 471–497.
Mackey, A., & Philp, J. (1998). Conversational interaction and second language development: Recasts, re-sponses, and red herrings? The Modern Language Journal, 82, 338–356.
Matsuda, S., & Gobel, P. (2003). Anxiety and predictors of performance in the foreign language classroom. System, 32, 21–36.
Philip, E. (1992). The effects of language anxiety on students’ oral test performance and attitudes. The Modern Language Journal, 76, 14–26.
Philp, J. (2003). Constraints on “noticing the gap”: Non-native speakers’ noticing of recasts in NS-NNS in-teraction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 99–126.
Saito, Y., Garza, T., & Horwitz, E. (1999). Foreign language reading anxiety. The Modern language Journal, 83(2), 202–218.
Satar, H. M. & Keynes, M. (2008). The effects of synchro-nous CMC on speaking proficiency and anxiety: Text versus voice chat. The Modern Language Journal, 92(4), 595–613.
Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The prefer-ence for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53(2), 361–382.
Schmidt, R., & Frota, S. (1986). Developing basic conversa-tional ability in a second language: A case study of an adult learner of Portuguese. In R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 237–326). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Schulz, R. A. (1996). Focus on form in the foreign language classroom: Students’ and teachers’ views on error correction and the role of grammar. Foreign Lan-guage Annals, 29(3), 343–364.
Schulz, R. A. (2001). Cultural differences in student and teacher perceptions concerning the role of grammar instruction and corrective feedback: USA–Colom-bia. The Modern Language Journal, 85, 244–258.
Sheen, Y. (2006). Exploring the relationship between charac-teristics of recasts and learner uptake. Language Teaching Research, 10(4), 361–392.
Sheen, Y. (2008). Recasts, language anxiety, modified output, and L2 learning. Language Learning, 58(4), 835–874.
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1995). Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step towards second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 16(3), 371–391.
Woodrow, L. (2006). Anxiety and speaking English as a second language. RELC, 37(3), 308–328.
Yan, J., & Horwitz, E. (2008). Learner’s perceptions of how anxiety interacts with personal and instructional fac-tors to influence their achievement in English: A qualitative analysis of EFL learners in China. Lan-guage Learning, 58(1), 151–183.
Yoshida, R. (2008). Teachers’ choice and learners’ preference of corrective feedback types. Language Aware-ness, 17(1), 78–93.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um030v5i22017p076
Copyright (c) 2017 Jurnal Pendidikan Humaniora (JPH)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Pendidikan Humaniora Education Journal Of Social Sciences Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang
|
