A Phenomenological Study on Issuess Of Planning and Budgeting Consistency in The Perspectives of Local Government Budget Team

Eko Prasetyo Ocktavianto, Iwan Triyuwono, Lilik Purwanti

Abstract


This study aims to gain an understanding of the importance of maintaining the consistency of planning and budgeting from the viewpoint of the Local Government Budget Team (TAPD). Using a phenomenological approach allows the disclosure of meaning systematically related to the phenomenon being studied. The study was developed using primary and secondary data sources. The primary data were derived from unstructured interviews and the secondary data used by researcher were in the form planning and budgetting documents, namely, RPJMD, RKPD, KUA PPAS and APBD. Some findings indicate that there are still many problems in the process of budget planning and budgeting at the research site. The problems manifest in the form of constraints in achieving consistency in planning and budgeting caused by both internal and external factors. Eventually, the results of the study conclude that efforts to maintain the consistency of planning and budgeting interpreted by TAPD of Probolinggo as guidance in realizing the accountability of the financial performance of local government through loyalty, effective evaluation and supervision and strong commitmen from the employees.

 

Keywords: budget, consistency, planning and budgeting, TAPD


Full Text:

PDF

References


Amstrong, M. (1999). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Terjemahan Sofyan dan Haryanto. Jakarta: PT. Elex Media Komputindo.

Anantha, A dan Elmizan, G. A. (2005). Analisis Konsistensi Perencanaan dan Penganggaran Pada Badan Penanggulangan Bencana Daerah Kabupaten Tanah Datar Tahun 2011-2015 Dengan Prediksi Kerugian Untuk Tahun 2016-2020. Jurnal KBP Vol. 3 No.1 Juli 2015.

Bertens, K. (1987). Fenomenologi Ekstensial. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia.

Burrel, G. dan G. Morgan. (1979). Sociological Paradigms and Organisational Analysis. . USA: Ashgate Publishing Company.

Brouwer. (1984). Psikologis fenomenologis. Jakarta: PT Gramedia.

Brownell, P. (1982). Participation in Budgeting Process: When It Works and When It Doesnít. Journal of Accounting Literature, Vol. 1 pp. 124-153.

Chua, W.F. (1986). Radical Developments in Accounting Thought. The Accounting Review. Vol. 61, No. 4 (Oct); 601-632.

Djamhuri, A. (2011). Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial Berbagai Paradigma Dalam Kajian Akuntansi. Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma. Vol 15 No.4 hal 1- 26.

https://doi.org/10.18202/jamal.2011.04.7115

Indriantoro, N. (1993). The Effect of Participative Budgeting on Job Performance and Job Satisfaction with Locus of Control and Cultur Dimensions as Moderating Variables. Accountancy Development in Indonesia, Publication Np. 18, Tim Koordinasi Pengembangan Akuntansi.

Kenis, L. (1979). The Effect of Budgetary Goal Characteristics on Managerial Attitudes and Performance. Accounting Review. October, p. 707-721.

Kuhn T. S. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Kuncoro, M. (2004). Otonomi dan Pembangunan Daerah, Reformasi, Perencanaan Strategi dan Peluang. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Khusaini, M. (2009). The Analysis of Consistency of Planning and Budgeting (Study of Some Districts and Cities in Indonesia). Malang: FEB UB.

Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing. London Sage Publications, Inc.

Mardiasmo. (2002). Akuntansi Sektor Publik. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Andi.

Mulyana, B. (2010). Modul Perencanaan dan Penganggaran Daerah. Diklat Akuntansi Keuangan Daerah. Jakarta: Badan Diklat Kementrian Keuangan RI.

Moleong, L.J. (2011). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Edisi Revisi. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Moustakas, C. E. (1994). Phenomenological Research Methods. California: SAGE Publication Inc.Thousand Oaks.

https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412995658

M. Nafarin. (2000). Penganggaran Perusahaan.Edisi Pertama. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Nasution, S. (1988). Metode Penelitian Naturalistik Kualitatif. Bandung: Tarsito.

Poerwandari, E. K. (1998). Metode Penelitian Sosial. Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka.

Robbins, S (2003) Perilaku Organisasi, Jilid 2. Jakarta: Gramedia.

Saladien. (2006). Rancangan Penelitian Kualitatif. Modul Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Disampaikan pada Pelatihan Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif Program Studi Ilmu Ekonomi, Fakultas Ekonomi, Universitas Brawijaya, 6-7 Desember. Malang.

Strauss, Anselm & Juliet Corbin, (2003). Dasar-dasar Penelitian Kualitatif. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Suparmoko. (2000). Keuangan Negara. Dalam Teori dan Praktik. Yogyakarta: BPFE Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Gajahmada.

Solichah, S. I. (2013). Analisis konsistensi perencanaan dan penganggaran di kabupaten Tulungagung (studi pada bidang pendidikan dan kesehatan tahun 2010-2013). Skripsi. Malang: Universitas Brawijaya.

Sobur, A. (2014). Filsafat Komunikasi (Tradisi dan Metode Fenomenologi). Edisi kedua. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Triyuwono, I. (2012). Akuntansi Syari'ah: Perspektif, Metodologi, dan Teori. Edisi ketiga. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Tuasikal, A. (2007). Pengaruh Pemahaman Sistem Akuntansi dan Pengelolaan Keuangan Daerah terhadap Kinerja Satuan Kerja Perangkat Daerah. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Sektor Publik, Vol.08, No.01, Februari 2007.

Widjaya,T.A. (1995). Dasar-Dasar Budgeting. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Willig, C. (1999). Introducing Qualitative Research in Psychology. New York: Open University Press.

Yandra, Febie (2010) Analisis Konsistensi Perencanaan dan Penganggaran pada Dinas Pekerjaan Umum Kabupaten solok Tahun 2006-2010. Tesis.Universitas Andalas.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26675/jabe.v1i1.9746

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Journal of Accounting and Business Education

License URL: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

This Journal Indexed by:

            

 

Lisensi Creative Commons
Ciptaan disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional.