Email this article Leading Empathic Engagement Through Teamwork Interaction in Classroom
Abstract
Abstract: Emphatic engagement in the classroom is feeling of students who perceive connected with their friends in learning activities in the classroom. Emphatic engagement is very important to emerge respect to the others, to be awarded of the diversity in life and to realize and concern to human beings. Empathic engagement can be taught from an early age in primary school students. With the right methods, students in elementary school can have a sense of empathy for the involvement of their friends that it will be very useful to give the best practice to adulthood process. The study aimed to explain how an empathic engagement was taught in primary school students. Emphatic engagement is through teamwork interaction in the classroom. Subjects of the research were students aged 9 years in primary school in Lamongan. The results showed that the teamwork interaction in classroom used by teachers in learning could deliver an empathic engagement. Students with an empathic engagement have awareness to always care for their fellow students and seek to participate in every learning activity in the classroom.
Key words: empathic engagement, interaction, teamwork
Abstrak: Keterlibatan empatik di kelas adalah perasaan siswa yang merasa terhubung dengan teman mereka dalam kegiatan belajar di kelas. Keterlibatan empatik sangat penting untuk memunculkan sikap menghargai terhadap orang lain, untuk dianugerahi keragaman dalam kehidupan dan untuk menyadari serta memperhatikan manusia. Keterlibatan secara empatik dapat diajarkan sejak usia dini pada siswa sekolah dasar. Dengan metode yang tepat, siswa di sekolah dasar dapat memiliki rasa empati atas keterlibatan teman-teman mereka sehingga akan sangat berguna untuk memberikan praktik terbaik untuk proses pendewasaan diri mereka. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskan bagaimana keterlibatan empatik diajarkan pada siswa sekolah dasar. Keterlibatan empatik adalah melalui interaksi kerja tim di kelas. Subjek penelitian ini adalah siswa berusia 9 tahun di sekolah dasar di Lamongan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa interaksi timbal balik di kelas yang digunakan oleh guru dalam pembelajaran dapat memberikan keterlibatan empatik. Siswa dengan keterlibatan empatik memiliki kesadaran untuk selalu peduli terhadap sesama siswa dan berusaha untuk berpartisipasi dalam setiap aktivitas belajar di kelas.
Kata kunci: keterlibatan empatik, interaksi, kerja tim
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alberto, P.A. & Troutman, A.C. (2009). Applied Behavior Analysis for Teachers, (Ed.8). New Jersey: Pearson.
Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., Kim, D., & Reschly, A. L. (2006). Measuring cognitive and psychological en-gagement: Validation of the Student Engagement Instrument. Journal of School Psychology, 44(5), 427–445.
Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., & Furlong, M. J. (2008). Student engagement with school: Critical concep-tual and methodological issues of the construct. Psychology in the Schools, 45(5), 369–386.
Arends, R.I. 2004. Learning to Teach. Boston: Mc Graw Hill.
Bardin, J. A., & Lewis, S. (2011). General education teachers’ ratings of the academic engagement level of stu-dents who read braille: A comparison with sighted peers. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 105(8), 479–492.
Brown, L. 1993. The New Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. New York: Oxford University Press.
Carini, R. M., Kuh, G. D., & Klein, S. P. (2006). Student en-gagement and student learning: Testing the linkages. Research in higher education, 47(1), 1–32.
Chapman, E. (2003). Alternative approaches to assessing student engagement rates. Practical assessment, research and evaluation, 13(8).
Christenson, S. L., & Thurlow, M. L. (2004). School drop-outs: Prevention considerations, interventions, and challenges. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13(1), 36–39.
Coates, H. (2010). Development of the Australasian survey of student engagement (AUSSE). Higher Educa-tion, 60(1), 1–17.
Conner, J. O. (2009). Student engagement in an independent research project: The influence of cohort culture. Journal of Advanced Academics, 21(1), 8–38.
Cooper, B. (2011). Empathy in education: Engagement, values and achievement. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Degeng, N.S. (2006). Teori Pembelajaran 2: Terapan. Ma-lang: Universitas Terbuka.
Finn, J.D. (1993). School Engagement and Students At Risk. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Sta-tistics.
Furrer, C., Skinner, E., Marchand, G., & Kindermann, T. A. (2006, March). Engagement vs. disaffection as cen-tral constructs in the dynamics of motivational de-velopment. In annual meeting of the Society for Research on Adolescence, San Francisco, CA.
Goslin, D.A. (2003). Engaging Minds, Motivation and Learning in America’s Schools. Lanham: The Scare-crow Press.
Hargreaves, D.H. (1972). Interpersonal Relations and Edu-cation. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Hitipeuw, I. (2009). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Malang: Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Negeri Malang.
Lodico, M.G., Spaulding, D.T. & Voegtle, K. (2010). Methods in Educational Research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Maloshonok, N. (2014). Vygotsky’s Theory: Lesson for Student Engagement Research. Retrieved from https://www.hse.ru/data/2014/06/02/1324961458/Vygotsky%E2%80%99s%20Theory%20Lessons%2 0for%20Student%20En..her%20School%20of%2 0Economics%20Moscow..pdf.
Muniroh, A. (2015). Emotional Engagement: Dasar Dalam pembelajaran Mengembangkan Empati Anak. Afka-rina, Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam. 2(4), 115–134.
Natriello, G. (1984). Problems in the evaluation of students and student disengagement from secondary schools. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 17(4), 14–24.
Noddings, N. (1986). Caring–A Feminine Approach to Ethics and Moral Education California, USA: Uni-versity of California Press.
Patrick, H., Ryan, A. M., & Kaplan, A. (2007). Early adoles-cents’ perceptions of the classroom social environ-ment, motivational beliefs, and engagement. Jour-nal of educational psychology, 99(1), 83–98.
Reschly, A. L., & Christenson, S. L. (2006). Prediction of dropout among students with mild disabilities: A case for the inclusion of student engagement vari-ables. Remedial and Special Education, 27(5), 276–292.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American psychol-ogist, 55(1), 68–78.
Rogers, C. R. (1975). Empathic: An unappreciated way of being. The counseling psychologist, 5(2), 2–10.
Sbrocco, R. 2009. Student Academic Engagement and Aca-demic Achievement Gap Between Black and White Middle School Students: Does Engagement In-crease Student Achievement? (Unpublished doctor-al dissertation) University of Minnesota, USA.
Sharkey, J. D., You, S., & Schnoebelen, K. (2008). Relations among school assets, individual resilience, and stu-dent engagement for youth grouped by level of fami-ly functioning. Psychology in the Schools, 45(5), 402–418.
Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of educational psychology, 85(4), 571–581.
Stipek. (2002). Effects School Restructuring on Size and Early Gains in Acievement an Enggagement. Sociol-ogy and Education, 68, 241–270.
Tinio, M. F. (2009). Academic engagement scale for grade school students. The assessment handbook, 2(1), 64–75.
Vygotsky. (1978). Mind in Society, The Development of Higher Psychological Process. London: Harvard University Press.
Watts, J. H. (2008). Emotion, empathy and exit: reflections on doing ethnographic qualitative research on sen-sitive topics. Medical Sociology Online, 3(2), 3–14.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um030v5i12017p008
Copyright (c) 2017 Jurnal Pendidikan Humaniora (JPH)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Pendidikan Humaniora Graduate School, Universitas Negeri Malang
|
