MEMURNIKAN KEWENANGAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI SEBAGAI LEMBAGA PENGAWAL KONSTITUSI (THE GUARDIAN OF THE CONSTITUTION)

Sudirman Sudirman

Abstract


Stated in constitution (UUD NRI Tahun 1945), one of Constitutional Court authority is
guarding the constitution, that means reviewing any law against the constitution. Whereas review any ordinances and regulation made under law would fall into the authority of Supreme Court. Based on stufen theory, ordinances and regulation made under law is inseparable and is the continuation of the constitution, so that authority review must fall under Constitutional Court as the guardian of the constitution. But constitution regulations see ordinances and regulation made under any law should be separated from constitution, so review authority fall under Supreme Court. This condition provokes dualism judicial review, addressing problems that able to disturb the goverment system of Indonesia. This article elaborates dualism judicial review problem and idea of purifying constitutional court authority as the guardian of constitution

Keywords


Authority, Constitutional Court, Judicial Rewiew

Full Text:

PDF


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jippk.v1i1.5936

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2016 Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan

License URL: http://journal.um.ac.id/index.php/jppk

 

   

View JIPPK Statistics

Free counters!

Creative Commons License
Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan by JIPPK is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at http://journal.um.ac.id/index.php/jppk.
Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at http://journal.um.ac.id/index.php/jppk.