Email this article 
Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Kontekstual Siswa SMA pada Materi Barisan dan Deret
Abstract
Abstract: This article was a study that aims to describe the contextual problem solving skills of senior high school students. We used problem solving indicator based on Polya. The results of this study indicated that on stage of understanding the problem, 8% of all students could understand every word of the problem but some students were wrong in writing what was known and asked from the problem. At the stage of planning the strategies of solving problems, 43% of all students could construct the solving plan for the question given. At the stage of implementing a plan, 33% of all students could finish all steps chosen to solve the problems systematically. In the last stage, i.e: checking the answers obtained, 16% of all students were able to check the answers back but some students were not able enough to check back the answers obtained.
Abstrak: Artikel ini merupakan suatu kajian yang bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan kemampuan pemecahan masalah kontekstual siswa SMA. Analisis data dalam kajian ini menggunakan indikator kemampuan pemecahan masalah Polya. Hasil kajian menunjukkan pada tahap memahami masalah sebesar 8% siswa dapat memahami setiap kata pada soal tetapi beberapa siswa salah dalam menuliskan apa yang diketahui dan ditanyakan dari soal. Pada tahap menyusun rencana penyelesaian sebesar 43% siswa dapat menyusun rencana penyelesaian dari soal tersebut. Pada tahap melaksanakan rencana sebesar 33% siswa mampu menyelesaikan semua langkah yang telah disusun untuk menyelesaikan soal tersebut dengan runtut dan sitematis. Pada tahap terakhir memeriksa kembali hasil jawaban sebesar 16% siswa mampu melakukan pengecekan jawaban, tetapi beberapa siswa kurang mampu dalam mengecek kembali jawaban yang didapatkannya.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Carraher, D.W., & Schliemann, A. (2002). Chapter 8: Is Everyday Mathematics Truly Relevant to Mathematics Education? Monographs of the Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 11(May), 131–153. https://doi.org/10.2307/749968
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Educational Research (Vol. 4). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.
Dewi, S. I. K. (2014). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa Kelas VIII dalam Menyelesaikan Soal pada Materi Faktorisasi Bentuk Aljabar SMP Negeri 1 Kamal Semester Gasal Tahun Ajaran 2013/2014. MATHEdunesa Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 3 (2).
Ergen, O., & Delice, A. (2016). The Weakest Link of Polya’s Stages Through Integral Problem Solving Process: What to Check. Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics, 36 (February), 31–36.
In’am, A. (2014). The Implementation of the Polya Method in Solving Euclidean Geometry Problems. International Education Studies, 7(7), 149–158. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v7n7p149.
Jha, S. K. (2012). Mathematics Performance of Primary School Students in Assam (India): An Analysis Using Newman Procedure. International Journal of Computer Applications in Engineering Sciences, II (I), 17–21.
Karatas, Ilhan and Baki, A. (2013). The Effect of Learning Environments Based on Problem Solving on Students’ Achievements of Problem Solving. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 5 (3), 249–267.
Komariah, K. (2011). Penerapan Metode Pembelajaran Problem Solving Model Polya untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Memecahkan Masalah bagi Siswa Kelas IX-J di SMPN 3 Cimahi. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Penelitian, Pendidikan dan Penerapan MIPA, Fakultas MIPA, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, 1.
Masrurotullaily., Hobri., & Suharto. (2013). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Keuangan Berdasarkan Model Polya Siswa Smk Negeri 6 Jember. Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Quantum Teaching, Kadikma, 4(2), 129–138.
Muir, T., Beswick, K., & Williamson, J. (2008). “I’m not very good at solving problems”: An Exploration of Students’ Problem Solving Behaviours. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 27(3), 228–241. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2008.04.003.
National Council of Teacher of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. School Science and Mathematics (Vol. 47). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2001.tb17957.x
Pardimin., & Widodo, S. A. (2016). Increasing Skills of Student in Junior High School to Problem Solving in Geometry with Guided. Journal of Education and Learning, 10, 390–395.
Phonapichat, P., Wongwanich, S., & Sujiva, S. (2014). An Analysis of Elementary School Students’ Difficulties in Mathematical Problem Solving. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116 (2012), 3169–3174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.728.
Polya, G. (1957). How To Solve It. How To Solve It. https://doi.org/10.2307/3609122.
Prakitipong, N. and, & Nakamura, S. (2006). Analysis of Mathematics Performance of Grade Five Students in Thailand Using Newman Procedure. Journal of International Cooperation in Education, 9 (1), 111–122.
Rahayuningsih, P., & Qohar, A. (2014). Analisis Kesalahan Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita Sistem Persamaan Linear Dua Variabel (SPLDV) dan Scaffoldingnya Berdasarkan Analisis Kesalahan Newman pada Siswa Kelas VIII SMP Negeri 2 Malang. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Sains Tahun II, (2), 109–116.
Rahman, S. A., Ghazali, M., & Ismail, Z. (2003). Integrating Ict in Mathematics Teaching Methods Course : How Has Ict Changed Student Teachers ’ Perception About Problem Solving. The Mathematics Education into the 21st Century Project. Proceedings of the International Conference The Decidable and the Undecidable in Mathematics Education Brno, Czech Republic., (September). Retrieved from http://www.math.unipa.it/~grim/21_project/21_brno03_AbdulRaman.pdf.
Santoso, D. A., A, Farid., & Ulum, B. (2017). Error Analysis of Students Working About Word Problem of Linear Program With NEA Procedure Error Analysis Of Students Working About Word Problem of Linear Program With NEA Procedure. Procedure. International Conference on Mathematics: Education, Theory and Application.
Sepeng, P., & Madzorera, A. (2014). Sources of Difficulty in Comprehending and Solving Mathematical Word Problems. International Journal Education Science, 6(2), 217–225.
Stacey, K. (2005). The Place of Problem Solving in Contemporary Mathematics Curriculum Documents. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 24 (3), 341–350. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2005.09.004.
Tambychik, T., Subahan, T., & Meerah, M. (2010). Students ’ Difficulties in Mathematics Problem-Solving : What do they Say ? Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 8 (5), 142–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.020.
Van Den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (2005). The Role of Contexts in Assessments. For the Learning of Mathematics, 25 (2), 2–9.
Widjaja, W. (2013). The Use of Contextual Problems to Support. IndoMS-JME, 4 (1991), 151–159.
Widjajanti, D. B. (2009). Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Mahasiswa Calon Guru Matematika: Apa dan Bagaimana Mengembangkannya P-25. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 3 (2), 402–413.
Yuan, S. (2013). Incorporating Pólya’s Problem Solving Method in Remedial Math. Journal of Humanistic Mathematics, 3(1), 96–107. https://doi.org/10.5642/jhummath.201301.08.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v3i5.11092
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2018 Meylia Dwi Jayanti, Edy Bambang Irawan, Santi Irawati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan Journal of Education: Theory, Research, and Development Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang
|
