Email this article 
Efektivitas Argument-Driven Inquiry untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berargumentasi Ilmiah pada Materi Laju Reaksi
Abstract
Abstract: The majority of problems occur in the learning science process are understanding the science concepts and using them to resolve problems; which making Indonesian students belong to low performers group. Some research proved that argumentation can help students to solve these kinds of problems. Therefore, this research conducted to measure the effectiveness of Argument-Driven Inquiry to enhance students’ scientific argument skills. Results showed that the average arguments’ score and the arguments’ quality of the students within the Argument-Driven Inquiry class are the highest among all classes.
Abstrak: Permasalahan utama yang terjadi pada siswa dalam mempelajari sains adalah kesulitan memahami konsep-konsep sains dan rendahnya kemampuan siswa dalam menghubungkan pengetahuan yang dimilikinya untuk menyelesaikan masalah yang menjadikan siswa Indonesia termasuk dalam kategori low performers. Beberapa penelitian membuktikan bahwa argumentasi dapat membantu siswa untuk menyelesaikan permasalahan tersebut. Oleh karena itu, dilakukan penelitian untuk mengukur efektivitas model pembelajaran Argument-Driven Inquiry terhadap keterampilan berargumentasi ilmiah siswa. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa rata-rata skor argumentasi siswa pada kelas Argument-Driven Inquiry adalah yang tertinggi dari semua kelas.Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Andriessen, J. (2006). Arguing to Learn. Dalam K. Sawyer (Ed.). Handbook of the Learning Sciences (hlm 443-459). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Aufschnaiter, C., Erduran, S., Osborne, J., & Simon, S. (2008). Arguing to Learn and Learning to Argue: Case Studies of How Students' Argumentation Relates to their Scientific Knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(1), 101—131.
Bricker, L., & Bell, P. (2008). Conceptualization of Argumentation from Science Studies and The Learning Science and their Implication for The Practices of Science Education. Science Education, 92(3), 473—498.
Creswell, J. E. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research, Fourth Edition. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.
Duschl, R. (2008). Science Education in Three-Part Harmony: Balancing Conceptual, Epistemic, and Social Learning Goals. Review of Research in Education, 32, 268–291.
Hasnunidah, N., Susilo, H., Irawati, M. H., & Sutomo, H. (2015). Argument-Driven Inquiry with Scaffolding as the Development Strategies of Argumentation and Critical Thinking Skills of Students in Lampung, Indonesia. American Journal of Educational Research, 3(9), 1185—1192.
Kuhn, D. (2010). Teaching and Learning Science as Argument. Science Education, 94, 810—824.
Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing the Quality of Argument in School Science. School Science Review, 82(301), 63—70.
Osborne, J., Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Monk, M. (2001). Enhancing the Quality of Argument in School Science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 10(41), 994—1020.
Ratcliffe, M., & Millar, R. (2009). Teaching for Understanding of Science in Context: Evidence from the Pilot Trials of the Twenty First Century Science Courses. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 945—959.
Sampson, V., & Clark, D. B. (2009). Assessment of the Ways Students Generate Arguments in Science Education: Current Perspectives and Recommendations for Future Directions. Science Education, 92, 447—472.
Sampson, V., & Clark, D. B. (2011). A Comparison of the Collaborative Scientific Argumentation Practices of Two High and Two Low Performing Groups. Journal of Research and Education, 41(1), 63—97.
Sampson, V., & Gleim, L. (2009). Argument-Driven Inquiry to Promote the Understanding of Important Concepts & Practices in Biology. The American Biology Teacher, 71(8), 465—472.
Sampson, V., Grooms, J., & Walker, J. P. (2010). Argument-Driven Inquiry as a Way to Help Students Learn How to Participate in Scientific Argumentation and Craft Written Arguments: An Exploratory Study. Science Education, 95, 217—257.
Tuysuz, C., Demirel, O. E., & Yildirim, B. (2013). Investigating the Effects of Argumentation, Problem and Laboratory Based Instruction Approaches on Pre-service Teachers’ Achievement Concerning the Concept of “Acid and Base”. Procedia, Social, and Behavioral Sciences, 93, 1376—1381.
Venville, G. J., & Dawson, V. M. (2010). The Impact of a Classroom Intervention on Grade 10 Students’ Argumentation Skills, Informal Reasoning, and Conceptual Understanding of Science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(8), 952—977.
Walker, J. P., & Sampson, V. (2013). Learning to Argue and Arguing to Learn: Argument-Driven Inquiry as a Way to Help Undergraduate Chemistry Students Learn How to Construct Arguments and Engage in Argumentation During a Laboratory Course. Journal of Research in Science and Teaching, 50, 561—596.
Wenning, C. J. (2006). Assessing Nature-of-Science Literacy as One Component of Scientific Literacy. Journal of Physic Teacher Education Online, 3(4), 3—14.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v5i1.13132
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2020 Putu Anindita Widhiya Putri, Sri Rahayu, Fauziatul Fajaroh
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan Journal of Education: Theory, Research, and Development Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang
|
