Keefektifan Pembelajaran POGIL dengan Strategi Konflik Kognitif untuk Mengurangi Miskonsepsi pada Materi Laju Reaksi Kelas XI SMA

Mafidatun Ni’mah, Subandi Subandi, Munzil Munzil

Abstract


Abstract: This study aims to determine what misconceptions experienced by students on the topic of reaction rates through diagnostic tests accompanied by interviews and determine the effectiveness of POGIL learning with cognitive conflict strategies in improving misconceptions. The research design used was one group pretest posttest research. The subjects in this study were 32 students of class XI one of the high schools in Sidoarjo who had obtained the reaction rate material. Student misconception data was obtained through a diagnostic test and confirmed by interview. The effectiveness of remidial learning is measured by comparing the percentage of students who experience misconceptions before and after treatment is given. The results showed that the misconceptions found at each subject were the basic concept of the reaction rate of 50%, the reaction rate was 59%, the reaction order was 44%, the collision theory was 38%, while the factors that influenced the findings were the misconceptions found on the main discussion of temperature factors by 41%, a concentration factor of 25%, a surface area factor of 75%, and a catalyst factor by 41%. POGIL learning with cognitive conflict strategies is classified as having a high level of effectiveness in reducing misconceptions.

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui miskonsepsi apa saja yang dialami oleh siswa pada topik laju reaksi melalui tes diagnostik disertai dengan wawancara serta mengetahui efektivitas pembelajaran POGIL dengan strategi konflik kognitif dalam  memperbaiki miskonsepsi. Rancangan penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian one grup pretest postes. Subjek dalam penelitian ini adalah 32 siswa kelas XI salah satu SMA di Sidoarjo yang telah memperoleh materi laju reaksi. Data miskonsepsi siswa didapat melalui tes diagnostik dan dikonfirmasi dengan wawancara. Keefektifan dari pembelajaran remidial diukur dengan membandingkan persentase jumlah siswa yang mengalami miskonsepsi sebelum dan sesudah diberikan perlakuan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa miskonsepsi yang ditemukan pada masing-masing pokok bahasan laju reaksi adalah konsep dasar laju reaksi sebesar 50%, persamaan laju reaksi 59%, orde reaksi 44%, teori tumbukan 38%, sedangkan pada faktor-faktor yang memengaruhi laju reaksi ditemukan miskonsepsi pada pokok bahasan faktor suhu sebesar 41%, faktor konsentrasi sebesar 25%, faktor luas permukaan 75%, dan faktor katalis sebesar 41%.  Pembelajaran POGIL dengan strategi konflik kognitif tergolong memiliki tingkat keefektifan yang tinggi dalam mengurangi miskonsepsi.

Keywords


cognitive conflict; misconceptions; reaction rate; konflik kognitif; miskonsepsi; laju reaksi

Full Text:

PDF

References


Amarlita, D. M. (2010). Identifikasi Kesalahan Konep pada Materi Laju Reaksi Siswa Kelas XI SMA Negeri 1 Pagak dan Perbaikannya menggunakan Strategi Konflik Kognitif. Tesis tidak dipublikasikan. Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang.

Bertiec, N., Nasrudin, H. (2013). Penerapan Strategi Konflik Kognitif untuk Mereduksi Miskonsepsi Level Sub-Mikroskopik pada Materi Larutan Penyangga di SMA Negeri 1 Sumberejo Bojonegoro. Unesa Journal of Chemical Education, 2(3), 12–18.

Cakmakci, G. (2005). A Cross-Sectional Study of the Understanding of Chemical Kinetics Among Turkish Secondary and Undergraduate Students. The University of Leeds School of Education., 294.

Cetin-Dindar, Ayla., Geban, O. (2011). Development of a Three-Tier Test to Assess High School Students’ Understanding of Acids and Bases. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 600–604.

Coll, R. K., & Treagust, D. F. (2001). Learners’ Use of Analogy and Alternative Conceptions for Chemical Bonding. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 48(1), 24–32.

Dhindsa, H. S., David F Treagust., & D Treagust. (2009). Conceptual Understanding of Bruneian Tertiary Students: Chemical Bonding and Structure, 1(1), 24–32.

Fermintasari, V. (2015). Keefektifan Tes Pilihan Ganda Dua tingkat dan Tes Pilihan Ganda Disertai Wawancara untuk Identifikasi Kesalahan Konsep Siswa dengan Kemampuan Berpikir Ilmiah Berbeda pada Materi Laju Reaksi Kelas XI IPA SMA Negeri 1 Lawang. Tesis tidak diterbitkan. Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang.

Fitriani, W., Irwandi, D., & Murniati, D. (2017). Perbandingan Model Pembelajaran Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL) dan Guided Inquiry (GI) terhadap Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa. JRPK: Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Kimia 7(1), 76–84.

Hanson, D. M. (2006). Instructor’s Guide to Process-Oriented Guided-Inquiry Learning. Lisle, IL: Pacific Crest.

Hardiansyah. (2015). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Stategi Konflik Kognitif Berbasis Eksperimen untuk Mereduksi Miskonsepsi IPA. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan LPMP Kalimantan Timur, 9(1).

Johnstone, A. H. (2000). Teaching of Chemistry - Logical or Psychological?. Chemistry Education Research Practice, 1(1), 9–15.

Kaya, E., & Geban, Ö. (2012). Facilitating Conceptual Change in Rate of Reaction Concepts Using Conceptual Change Oriented Instruction. Education and Science, 37(163), 216–225.

Kolomuç, A., & Tekin, S. (2011). Chemistry Teachers’ Misconceptions Concerning Concept of Chemical Reaction Rate. Eurasian Journal of Physics Chemistry Education, 3(2), 84–101.

Lee, G., Kwon, J., Sang-Suk Park, Jung-Whan Kim, Hyeok-Gu Kwon., & Hac-Kyoo Park. (2003). Development of an Instrument for Measuring Cognitive Conflict in Secondary-Level Science Classes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(6), 585–603.

Nakhleh, M. B. (1992). Why Some Students Don’t Learn Chemistry: Chemical Misconceptions. Journal of Chemical Education 69(3), 191.

Nicoll, G. (2001). A Report of Undergraduates’ Bonding Misconceptions. International Journal of Science Education, 23(7), 707–730.

Posner, G. J., Kenneth A. Strike, Peter W. Hewson., & William A. Gertzog. (1982). Accommodation of a Scientific Conception: Toward a Theory of Conceptual Change. Science Education, 66(2), 211–217.

Sadeh, I., & Zion, M. (2009). The Development of Dynamic Inquiry Performances within an Open Inquiry Setting: A Comparison to Guided Inquiry Setting. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(10), 1137–1160.

Santoso, T., & Supriadi. (2015). Pembelajaran Penalaran Argument Berbasis Peta Konsep untuk Remidiasi Miskonsepsi Laju Reaksi Kimia. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 21(1), 80–87.

Sirhan, G. (2007). Learning Difficulties in Chemistry: An Overview. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 4(2), 2–22.

Sugiyono. (2001). Metode Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Ta, Ö., Yalçinkaya, E., & Yezdan Boz. (2010). Pre-Service Chemistry Teachers’ Ideas about Reaction Mechanism. Journal of Turkish Scinece Education, 7(1), 47–60.

Treagust, D. F. (1988). Development and Use of Diagnostic Tests to Evaluate Students’ Misconceptions in Science. International Journal of Science Education, 10(2), 159–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069880100204.

Wandersee, J. H. (1986). Can the History of Science Help Science Educators Anticipate Students’ Misconceptions? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23(7), 581–597. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660230703.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v5i9.14010

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Mafidatun Ni’mah, Subandi Subandi, Munzil Munzil

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


JPtpp is accredited “Rank 3” as a scientific journal under the decree of the Directorate General of Research Enhancement and Development, Ministry of Research, Technology, and Higher Education, dated December 7, 2022, No: 225/E/KPT/2022, effective for five years from Volume 7 Issue 8, 2022 until Volume 12 Issue 7, 2027. Link to download


Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan

Journal of Education: Theory, Research, and Development

Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang

Lisensi Creative Commons

JPtpp is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License