Email this article 
Efektivitas Learning Cycle 3E Berkonteks Socioscientific Issues terhadap Pemahaman Konsep dan Penjelasan Ilmiah Siswa Sekolah Dasar
Abstract
Abstract: This study aims to determine the effectiveness of the 3E learning cycle model in the context of socioscientific issues on conceptual understanding and scientific explanations of grade V students on science content. This study used a quasy experimental approach with posttest only control group design. The subjects of this study were fifth grade students in two public schools in Kalipare sub-district, namely SDN A and SDN B. The research instruments consisted a conceptual test of 20 multiple choice questions (α Cronbach’s = 0,842) and 5 scientific explanation test with essay questions (α Cronbach’s = 0,882). The answers of scientific explanations are categorized using SOLO Taxonomy and tested by Cohen Kappa. Data analysis using ANOVA, Post Hoc further test and effect size. Product moment correlation test is used to see the correlation between understanding concepts and scientific explanations. The results of the study show that the 3E learning cycle model has socioscientific issues contexts that are effective in improving students' understanding of concepts and scientific explanations. Correlation analysis between understanding concepts and scientific explanations has a positive correlation.
Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui efektivitas model learning cycle 3E berkonteks socioscientific issues terhadap pemahaman konsep dan penjelasan ilmiah siswa kelas V pada muatan IPA. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan quasy eksperimental dengan posttest only control group design. Subjek penelitian adalah siswa kelas V di dua sekolah negeri kecamatan Kalipare, yaitu SDN A dan SDN B. Instrumen penelitian terdiri dari tes pemahaman konsep 20 soal pilihan ganda dan 5 soal essay tes penjelasan ilmiah. Jawaban penjelasan ilmiah dikategorikan menggunakan Taksonomi SOLO dan diuji Cohen Kappa. Analisis data menggunakan uji ANOVA, uji lanjut Post Hoc, dan effect size. Uji korelasi product moment digunakan untuk melihat hubungan antara pemahaman konsep dan penjelasan ilmiah. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa model learning cycle 3E berkonteks socioscientific issues efektif untuk meningkatkan pemahaman konsep dan penjelasan ilmiah siswa. Analisis korelasi antara pemahaman konsep dan penjelasan ilmiah memiliki hubungan positif.Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ajaja, O. P. (2013). Which Way Do We Go in Biology Teaching? Lecturing, Concept Mapping, Cooperative Learning or Learning Cycle?. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 17(1).
Alameh, S., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2018). Towards a Philosophically Guided Schema for Studying Scientific Explanation in Science Education. Science & Education, 27(9-10), 831—861.
Biggs, J., & Collis, K. (1989). Towards a Model of School-Based Curriculum Development and Assessment Using the SOLO Taxonomy. Australian Journal of Education, 33(2), 151—163.
Braaten, M., & Windschitl, M. (2011). Working Toward a Stronger Conceptualization of Scientific Explanation for Science Education. Science Education, 95(4), 639—669.
Bybee, R., McCrae. B., & Laurie, R. (2009). PISA 2006: An Assesment of Scientific Literacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(8), 865—883.
Creswell, J. (2012). Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research Fourth Edition. Boston: Pearson Education Inc.
Dani, D. (2011). Sustainability as a Framework for Analyzing Socioscientific Issues. International Electronic Journal of Environmental Education, 1(2), 113—128.
Fajaroh, F., & Dasna, I W. (2008). Pembelajaran dengan Model Siklus Belajar (Learning Cycle). Malang: Jurusan Kimia FMIPA UM.
Fitzgerald, A. (2014). Learning and Teaching Primary Science. Cambrige: University Press.
Holbrook, J., & Rannikmae, M. (2009). The meaning of scientific literacy. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 4(3), 275—288.
Jack, G. U. (2017). The Effect of Learning Cycle Constructivist-Based Approach on Students' Academic Achievement and Attitude towards Chemistry in Secondary Schools in North-Eastern Part of Nigeria. Educational Research and Reviews, 12(7), 456—466.
Karahan, E., & Roehrig, G. (2016). Secondary School Students’ Understanding of Science and their Socioscientific Reasoning. Research in Science Education, 47(4), 755—782.
Karpudewan, M., & Roth, W. M. (2018). Changes in Primary Students’ Informal Reasoning During an Environment-Related Curriculum on Socio-Scientific Issues. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(3), 401—419.
Karthwolf, D. R., & Anderson, W. (2002). A Revision of Bloom Taxonomy: An Overview Theory into Practice. The Ohio State University.
Kemendikbud. (2017). Materi Pendukung Literasi Sains. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan: Jakarta.
Klosterman, M. L. & Sadler, T. D. (2010). Multi-level Assesment of Scientific Content Knowledge Gains Associated with Socioscientifik Issues-based Instruction. International Journal of Science Education, 32(8), 1017–1043
Lindah, M. G., & Folkesson, A. M. (2016). Attitudes and Language Use in Group Discussions on Socio-Scientific Issues. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(2).
Lombardi, D., Brandt, C. B., Bickel, E. S., & Burg, C. 2016. Students’ Evaluations about Climate Change. International Journal of Science Education, 38(8), 1392—1414.
Marek, E. A. (2008). Why the Learning Cycle?. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 20(3), 63.
McNeill, K. L., & Krajcik, J. (2006). Supporting Students’ Construction of Scientific Explanation through Generic Versus Context-Specific Written Scaffolds. In Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.
McNeill, K. L. 2009. Teachers’ Use of Curriculum to Support Students in Writing Scirntific Argument to Explain Phenomena. Science Education, 93, 233—268.
Nuangchalerm, P. 2009. Development of Socioscientific Issues-Based Teaching for Preservice Science Teachers. Journal of Social Sciences, 5(3), 239—243.
Mahanani, I., Rahayu, S., & Fajaroh, F. (2019). Pengaruh Pembelajaran Inkuiri Berkonteks Socioscientific Issues terhadap Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis dan Scientific Explanation. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 3(1), 53—68.
Morris, H. (2014). It's Still Science but Not Like Normal Science: Girls' Responses to the Teaching of Socio-Scientific Issues. School Science Review, 96(355), 105—111.
Osborne, J. F., & Patterson A. (2011). Scientific Argument and Explanation: A Nacessary Distinction?. Science Education, 627—638.
Piliang, Y. M. (2014). Transformasi Budaya Sains dan Teknologi: Membangun Daya Kreativitas. Jurnal Sisioteknologi, 13(2), 76—83
Rahayu, S. (2014). Menuju Masyarakat Berliterasi Sains: Harapan dan Tantangan Kurikulum 2013. Makalah disajikan dalam Seminar Nasional Kimia dan Pembelajaran (SNKP) 2014, Jurusan Kimia FMIPA Universitas Negeri Malang, 6 September 2014.
Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2009). Scientific Literacy, PISA, and Socioscientific Discourse: Assessment for Progressive Aims of Science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(8), 909—921.
Sadler, T. D. & Donnelly, L. A. (2006). Socioscientifik Argumentation: The Effects of Content Knowledge and Morality. International Journal of Science Education, 28(12), 1463—1488.
Sakschewski, M., Eggert, S., Schneider, S., & Bögeholz, S. (2014). Students’ Socioscientific Reasoning and Decision-Making on Energy-Related Issues—Development of a Measurement Instrument. International Journal of Science Education, 36(14), 2291—2313.
Samatowa, U. (2011). Pembelajaran IPA di Sekolah Dasar. Jakarta: Indeks.
Seah, L. H. (2015). Understanding the Conceptual and Language Challenges Encountered by Grade 4 Students when Writing Scientific Explanations. Research in Science Education, 46(3), 413—437.
Soobard, R., & Rannikmae, M. 2015. Examining Curriculum Related Progress Using a Context-Based Test Instrument – A Comparison of Estonian Grade 10 and 11 Students. Science Education International, 26(3), 263—283.
Stemler, S. (2001). An Overview of Content Analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7(17), 137—146.
Sulisworo, D., & Sutadi, N. 201). Science Learning Cycle Method to Enhance the Conceptual Understanding and the Learning Independence on Physics Learning. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 6(1), 64—70.
Uyanik, G. Ă. (2016). Effect of Learning Cycle Approach-Based Science Teaching on Academic Achievement, Attitude, Motivation, and Retention. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(5), 1223—1230.
Wang, Chia-Yu. (2014). Scaffolding Middle School Students’ Construction of Scientific Explanations: Comparing a Cognitive Versus a Metacognitive Evaluation Approach. International Journal of Science Education, 37(2), 237—271.
Wu, H. K., & Wu, C. L. (2011). Exploring the Development of Fifth Graders’ Practical Epistemologies and Explanation Skills in Inquiry-Based Learning Classrooms. Research in Science Education, 41(3), 319—340.
Yang, H. T., & Wang, K. H. (2013). A Teaching Model for Scaffolding 4th Grade Students’ Scientific Explanation Writing. Research Science Education.
Yilmaz, D., Tekkaya, C., & Sungur, S. (2011). The Comparative Effect of Prediction/Discussion-Based Learning Cycle, Conceptual Change Text, and Traditional Instruction on Student Understanding Genetic. International Journal of Science Education, 33(5), 607—628.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v5i11.14154
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Dita Setya Arini, Sri Rahayu, Sentot Kusairi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan Journal of Education: Theory, Research, and Development Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang
|
