The Readability Level of Reading Texts in Erlangga Straight Point Series: English for Eleventh Grade Students

Ratri Handayani, Furaidah Furaidah, Francisca Maria Ivone

Abstract


Abstract: This study aims to describe the readability level of reading texts in ESPS: English for the 11th grade students. The measurement tools were Coh-Metrix RDL2, Miyazaki EFL Reading Index and teachers’ professional judgment. The formula were effective in measuring the texts readability by calculating the number of words, letters, and sentences in the text. The Score of Coh-Metrix RDL2 showed that the reading texts was easier for reading level of 11th graders. MEFLRI claimed that reading texts in ESPS textbook are match for reading level of 11th graders. Teachers’ judgment claimed, the texts were suitable for eleventh grade students.

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan tingkat keterbacaan 19 teks bacaan dalam ESPS: English untuk siswa kelas 11. Tiga alat ukur digunakan untuk mengukur tingkat keterbacaan yakni Coh-Metrix RDL2 dan Miyazaki EFL Reading Index, dan penilaian guru. Kedua formula terbukti efektif dalam mengukur keterbacaan teks dengan menghitung total huruf, kata, dan kalimat dalam teks. Coh-Metrix menunjukkan bahwa teks bacaan lebih mudah dipahami oleh siswa pada kelas 11, sedangkan MEFLRI menunjukkan bahwa teks bacaan sangat cocok diberikan pada kelas 11. Penilaian guru menyatakan teks bacaan sesuai untuk siswa kelas 11.

Keywords


readability; reading texts; teachers’ professional judgment; keterbacaan; membaca teks; penilaian profesional guru

Full Text:

PDF

References


Berardo, S. A. (2006). The Use of Authentic Materials in the Teaching of Reading. The Reading Matrix, 6(2), 60–69.

Byrd, P., & Schuemann, C. (2014). English as a Second/Foreign Language Textbooks: How to Choose Them-How to Use Them. In M. Celce-Mucia (Ed.), Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language (4th Ed, pp. 380–393). National Geographic Learning: Heinle Cengage Learning.

Cahyono, B. Y., & Widiati, U. (2006). the Teaching of Efl Listening in the Indonesian Context: the State of the Art. TEFLIN Journal, 20(2), 194–211. https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v20i2/194-211

Crossley, S. A., Greenfield, J., & McNamara, D. S. (2008). Assessing Text Readability Using Cognitively Based Indices. TESOL Quarterly, 42(3), 475–493. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2008.tb00142.x

Garinger, D. (2002). Textbook Selection for the ESL Classroom. CAL Digests, December 2002, 3.

Greenfield, J. (2004). Readability Formulas for EFL. JALT Journal, 26(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.37546/jaltjj26.1-1

Hadi, A. (2006). Reading Based-Classroom Activities: An Effort Toward the Integration of Language Skills in Teaching English As a Foreign Language in Indonesia. TEFLIN Journal, 17(1), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v17i1/61-71

Jayanti, F. G. (2016). Reading Difficulties: Comparison on Students and Teachers Perception. Fourth International Seminar OnEnglish Language and Teaching, 296–301.

Johnson, J. C. (2005). What Makes a “Good” Reader? Asking Students to Define “Good” Readers. The Reading Teacher, 58(8), 766–770. https://doi.org/10.1598/rt.58.8.6

Kirkpatrick, A., & Liddicoat, A. J. (2017). Language Education Policy and Practice in East and Southeast Asia. Language Teaching, 50(2), 155–188. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444817000027

Knight, B. A. (2015). Teachers’ Use of Textbooks in the Digital Age. Cogent Education, 2(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2015.1015812

Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (2013). How Language are Learned. Oxford University Press.

Mckee, S. (2012). Reading Comprehension, What We Know: A Review of Research 1995 to 2011. Language Testing in Asia, 2(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1186/2229-0443-2-1-45

McNamara, D. S., Graesser, A. C., McCarthy, P. M., & Cai, Z. (2014). Automated Evaluation of Text and Discourse with Coh-Metrix. Cambridge University Press.

Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning Vocabulary in Another Language. Cambridge University Press.

Nguyen, C. D. (2020). Lexical Features of Reading Passages in English-language Textbooks for Vietnamese High-school Students: Do they Foster both Content and Vocabulary Gain? RELC Journal, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688219895045

Rahmawati, I. Y., & Lestari, L. A. (2014). The Readability Level of Reading Texts in The English Language Textbooks Used by The Tenth Grade. Retain, 2(3), 1–7.

Richards, J. C. (2001). The Role of Textbooks in a Language Program The Role of Textbooks in a Language Program. June, 1–6.

Richardson, J. S., & Morgan, R. F. (1990). Reading to Learn in the Content Areas. Wadsworth Publishing Company.

Ruddell, M. R. (1993). Teaching Content Reading and Writing. Allyn and Bacon.

Rush, R. (1985). Assessing Readability: Formulas and Alternatives. Reading Teacher, 39(3), 274–283.

Sangia, R. A. (2016). Assessing Reading Text in English Textbook for Eleventh Grader Published by Ministry of Education and Culture. Paramasastra, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.26740/parama.v3i1.1544

Saville-Troike, M. (2006). Introducing: Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge University Press.

Snow, C. E. (2002). Reading for Understanding: Towards an R & D Program in Reading Comprehension. RAND.

Sukmadinata, N. S. (2016). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. PT Remaja Rosdakarya Offset.

Uri, N. F. M., & Aziz, M. S. A. (2018). Assessing Readability of a National Exam Reading Texts in Malaysia. European Journal of English Language Teaching, 4(1), 149–164. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1463061

Yulianto. (2019). An Analysis of Readability Level of English Reading Texts for Eight Grade Students. Journal of English for Academic (J-SHMIC), 6(1).

Yunita, L. R., Suharsono, S., & Munir, A. (2017). Readability in Classroom Practice of Report Text as Reading Material of Eleventh Graders. Journal of English Language and Literature, 8(3), 673. https://doi.org/10.17722/jell.v8i3.278

Zhang, L. J. (2016). Teaching Reading and Viewing to L2 Learners. English Language Teaching Today: Linking Theory and Practice (pp. 127–141). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38834-2_10




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v5i11.14168

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Ratri Handayani, Furaidah Furaidah, Francisca Maria Ivone

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


JPtpp is accredited “Rank 3” as a scientific journal under the decree of the Directorate General of Research Enhancement and Development, Ministry of Research, Technology, and Higher Education, dated December 7, 2022, No: 225/E/KPT/2022, effective for five years from Volume 7 Issue 8, 2022 until Volume 12 Issue 7, 2027. Link to download


Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan

Journal of Education: Theory, Research, and Development

Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang

Lisensi Creative Commons

JPtpp is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License