Learning from Debaters: Insights Into Their Learning Strategies

Fitri Alfia Rahmawati, Johannes Ananto Prayogo, Furaidah Furaidah

Abstract


Abstract: This study aims to analyze English debaters’ learning strategies in improving their debate skills. The researcher used descriptive qualitative in the form of in depth interview in which three successful English debaters were involved in this study. The result reveals that debaters habituate themselves to read a lot, watch debate videos and practice by using a wide variety of language learning strategies. Those strategies are seeking practice opportunity, using resources, overviewing materials, asking for correction, using synonym or circumlocution, self-evaluating, practicing naturalistically, taking note, summarizing, using progressive relaxation, deep breathing or meditation and cooperation with peers.

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisa strategi belajar para ahli debat bahasa Inggris dalam mengembangkan kemampuan debatnya. Dalam penelitian ini, peneliti menggunakan pendekatan deskriptif kualitatif dalam bentuk interview mendalam dengan melibatkan tiga ahli debat yang sukses. Hasil penelitian ini mengungkapkan bahwa para ahli debat membiasakan diri untuk banyak membaca, menonton video debat dan berlatih dengan menggunakan berbagai macam strategi pembelajaran bahasa. Strategi-strategi tersebut adalah mencari peluang untuk praktek, menggunakan sumber belajar, meninjau materi, meminta koreksi, menggunakan sinonim, mengevaluasi diri, berlatih secara natural, mencatat, meringkas, menggunakan relaksasi progresif, pernapasan dalam atau meditasi dan kerja sama dengan teman sebaya.

Keywords


debate; learning strategies; language skills; debat; belajar strategi; kemampuan bahasa

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abrar, M., Failasofah., Fajaryani, N., Masbirorotni. (2016). EFL Student Teachers’ Speaking Anxiety: The Case in One English Teacher Education Program. Indonesian Journal of English Education, 3(1). DOI: 10.15408/ijee.v3i1.3619

Aclan, E. M., & Aziz, N. H. A. (2015). Exploring Parliamentary Debate as A Pedagogical Tool to Develop English Communication Skills in EFL/ESL Classrooms. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 4(2). DOI: 10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.4n.2p.1

Alemi, M., Daftarifard, P., & Pashmforoosh, R. (2011). The Impact of Language Anxiety and Language Proficiency on WTC in

EFLContext. Cross-Cultural Communication, 7(3). DOI:10.3968/j.ccc.1923670020110703.152

Alfian, A. (2016). The Application of Language Learning Strategies of High School Students in Indonesia.Indonesian Journal of English Education, 3(2). DOI:10.15408/ijee.v3i2.5509

Agustina, L & Bahrani, (2016). The Implementation of British Parliamentary Debating in Mulawarman Debate Society. Indonesian Journal of EFL And Linguistics, 1(1). Retrieved from www.indonesian-efl-journal.org

Anggitasari, M. (2016). Students’ Perceptions on Factors Affecting the Anxiety of the 12th Graders of SMKN 10 Malang in Speaking English. Unpublished Thesis: State University of Malang, Malang.

Arung, F. (2016). Improving Students’ Speaking Skill through Debate Technique.Journal of English Education,1(1). DOI:10.31327/jee.v1i1.85.

Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Razavieh, A., & Sorensen, C.K. (2010). Introduction to research in education (8th ed). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

Cahyani, H. (2010). Profile of Successful English Language Learners: A Case Study of Students at Accounting Department, State Polytechnic of Malang. Unpublished Thesis: State University of Malang.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.

Fauzan, U. (2016). Enhancing Speaking Ability of EFL Students through Debate and Peer Assessment. EFL Journal.1(1), 49-57. DOI: 10.21462/eflj.v1i1.8

Fewell, N. (2010). Language Learning Strategies and English Language Proficiency: An Investigation of Japanese EFL University Students. TESOL Journal, 2, 159-174.

Gani, S.A., Fajrina, D., & Hanifa, R. (2015). Students’ Learning Strategies for Developing Speaking Ability. Studies in English Language and Education, 2(1), 16. DOI: 10.24815/siele.v2i1.2232

Griffiths, C. (2015). What Have We Learnt from ‘Good Language Learners’? ELT Journal, 69(4), 425-443. DOI: 10.1093/elt/ccv040

Hall, D. (2011). Debate: Innovative Teaching to Enhance Critical Thinking and Communication Skills in Healthcare Professionals. The Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice. 9(3), 16–19.

Healey, R. L. (2012). The Power of Debate: Reflections on the Potential of Debates for Engaging Students in Critical Thinking About Controversial Geographical Topics. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 36(2), 239–257. DOI: 10.1080/03098265.2011.619522

Hismanoglu, M. (2000). Language Learning Strategies in Foreign Language Learning and Teaching. The Internet TESL Journal, 6(8). Retrieved from (http:iteslj.org/Articles/Hismanoglu-Strategies.html)

Husnawadi & Syamsudarni. (2016). The Role of English Debating Tournament in the Face of ASEAN Economic Community (AEC). Dinamika Ilmu. 16(1). DOI: 10.21093/di.v16i1.353.

Indah, R. N., & Kusuma W. A. (2016). Factors Affecting the Development of Critical Thinking of Indonesian Learners of English Language. Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 21(6). DOI: 10.9790/0837-2106088694

Kennedy, R. (2009). The power of in-class debates. Active Learning in Higher Education, 10(3), 225–236. DOI: 10.1177/1469787409343186

Kusumaningrum, S.R. (2010). Learning Strategies of Successful English Learners at MAN 3 Malang in Improving Their Speaking Ability.Unpublished Thesis: State University of Malang

Lestari, Y., & Awalludin, A. (2018). British Parliamentary Debating System In Improving Students’ Speaking Achievement. Journal of English Education, Literature and Linguistics,1(2), 79-86.

Malasari, L & Purwanti, S. E. (2018). The Effectiveness of Debate Technique Toward the Students' Confidence in Speaking Skill at XI Grade of SMKN 2 Tembilahan. Wiralodra English Journal (WEJ), 2(2) DOI: 10.31943/wej.v2i2.39

Mbato, C. L. (2019). Indonesian EFL Learners’ Critical Thinking in Reading: Bridging the Gap between Declarative, Procedural and Conditional Knowledge. Humaniora,31(1). DOI: 10.22146/jh.v31i1.37295

Mistar, J., Zuhairi, A., Umamah, A. (2014). Strategies of Learning Speaking Skill by Senior High School EFL Learners in Indonesia. Asian EFL Journal, 81,65-74 retrieved from (http:/asian-efl-journal.com),

Nunan, D. (1991). Language Teaching Methodology: A Textbook for Teachers. Hemel Hempstead: Prentice Hall International.

Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language Learning Strategies: What Every Teacher Should Know. New York: Newbury House.

Othman. M., Zulkefli, M.H., Hashim, R., & Mohamad, F. (2015). The Effects of Debate Competition on Critical Thinking among Malaysian Second Language Learners. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 23(4), 656-664.DOI: 10.5829/idosi.mejsr.2015.23.04.22001

Rachmawati, Y. (2013). Language Learning Strategies Used by Learners in Learning Speaking. Journal of English and Education, 1(2), 124-131.

Rahman, L. I., Fachrurrazy., Wahyudi, A. (2014). Successful Learners’ Learning Strategies at the English Department of STKIP PGRI Blitar. Jurnal Pendidikan Humaniora, 3(4), 287-294.

Rai, A. (2011). Benefits of In-Class Debates as an Instructional Strategy. Economic Affairs, 56(2), 139-145.

Reinders, H. (2010). Towards a Classroom Pedagogy for Learner Autonomy: A Framework of Independent Language Learning Skills. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 35(5). DOI: 10.14221/ajte.2010v35n5.4

Rybold, G. (2006). Speaking, Listening and Understanding: Debate for non-native English Speakers. IDEBATE Press. South Port: United Kingdom.

Sadeghi, B., Hassani, M. T., & Mohammadloo, M. B. (2015). The Comparative Effect of Teacher- and Peer-assessment on EFL Learners’ Self-confidence. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 6(5). DOI: 10.17507/jltr.0605.13

Salahshour,F., Sharifi, M., & NedaSalahshour. (2013). The relationship between language learning strategy use, language proficiency level and learner gender. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences,7. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.01.103

Sueb. (2014). Critical Thinking Reflected in Academic Debate Practices for English Language Classroom. Thesis. Graduate Program in English Language Education: State University of Malang.

Suwanarak, K. (2015). Learning English as Thai Adult Learners: An Insight into Experience in Using Learning Strategies. English Language Teaching, 8(12), 144. DOI: 10.5539/elt.v8n12p144

Syamdianita. (2011). The Effectiveness of British Parliamentary Debate System on Students’ Critical Thinking Ability. Unpublished Thesis. State University of Malang, Malang.

Tuan, N. H., & Mai, T. N. (2015). Factors Affecting Students’ Speaking Performance at Le Thanh Hien High School. Asian Journal of Educational Research 3(2), 16.

Yanda, F. (2013). The Effectiveness of Debate in the Speaking Class of Third Semester Students of English Letters Department at IAIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya. Unpublished Thesis. State University of Malang, Malang.

Yang, C.-H., & Rusli, E. (2012). Using Debate as A Pedagogical Tool in Enhancing Pre-Service Teachers Learning and Critical Thinking. Journal of International Education Research (JIER), 8(2), 135–144. DOI:10.19030/jier.v8i2.6833

Yulia, H., & Aprilita, N. (2017). The Implementation of British Parliamentary Debate Style Training to Improve Second Semester Student's Speaking Ability at English Education Study Program of Baturaja University. International Journal of English Language and Teaching, 1(1). DOI: 10.22437/ijolte.v1i1.4585

Zare, P. (2012). Language Learning Strategies Among EFL/ESL Learners: A Review of Literature. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2(5), 8.

Zare, P., & Othman, M. (2015). Students' Perceptions toward Using Classroom Debate to Develop Critical Thinking and Oral Communication Ability. Asian Social Science,11(9). DOI:10.5539/ass.v11n9p158




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v5i11.14170

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Fitri Alfia Rahmawati, Johannes Ananto Prayogo, Furaidah Furaidah

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


JPtpp is accredited “Rank 3” as a scientific journal under the decree of the Directorate General of Research Enhancement and Development, Ministry of Research, Technology, and Higher Education, dated December 7, 2022, No: 225/E/KPT/2022, effective for five years from Volume 7 Issue 8, 2022 until Volume 12 Issue 7, 2027. Link to download


Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan

Journal of Education: Theory, Research, and Development

Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang

Lisensi Creative Commons

JPtpp is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License