Email this article 
Pengembangan Rubrik untuk Menilai Proposal Penelitian Peserta Pelatihan Pembentukan Jabatan Fungsional Peneliti
Abstract
Abstract: The difference of standards used by raters, have become problem during assessing training participant's research proposals. The assessment result become subjective and resulted score with high level of disparity. The purpose of this study is to produce a rubric that can produce objective and consintence scores. Rubric developed by combining asmawi development model with mckeown and biss development model. The rubric stated valid after tested and receiving feedback from evaluation expert, material expert, instructors, training participants, and training commitee. The score of rubric’s coeficient correlation is 0.78. With this score, the rubric can be stated as a reliable rubric.
Abstrak: Perbedaan standar yang dimiliki oleh masing-masing penguji ketika menilai proposal penelitian telah menghasilkan nilai dengan tingkat disparitas yang cukup tinggi. Akibatnya nilai yang dihasilkan menjadi subjektif dan tidak konsisten. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menghasilkan sebuah rubrik penilaian yang dapat menghasilkan nilai yang objektif dan konsisten. Penelitian ini termasuk dalam jenis penelitian dan pengembangan. Rubrik dibuat dengan menggabungkan dua model pengembangan yaitu model zainul dan model mckeown and biss. Rubrik dinyatakan valid setelah diujicoba serta mendapat masukan dari ahli evaluasi, ahli materi, pengajar, peserta, dan penyelenggara pelatihan. Rubrik memiliki nilai koefisien korelasi sebesar 0,78. Dengan skor tersebut maka rubrik dinyatakan reliabel.Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Aji, S. D., Hudha, M. N., Huda, C., Nandiyanto, A. B. D., & Abdullah, A. G. (2018). The Improvement of Learning Effectiveness in The Lesson Study by Using E-Rubric. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 13(5), 1181–1189.
Arifin, Z. (2011a). Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosda Karya.
Arifin, Z. (2011b). Penelitian Pendidikan: Metode dan Paradigma Baru. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosda Karya.
Aulet, T. H., Moore, J. S., Callas, P. W., Nicholas, C., & Hulme, M. (2018). ( En ) trust me : Validating an Assessment Rubric for Documenting Clinical Encounters During a Surgery Clerkship Clinical Skills Exam *. The American Journal of Surgery, (xxxx), 2–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.12.055
Brookhart, S. M. (2013). How to Create and Use Rubrics for Formative Assessment and Grading. Alexandria: ASCD.
Febriyanti, A. L., Harsiati, T., & Dermawan, T. (2017). Pengembangan Instumen Asesemen Menulis Kreatif Cerita Fantasi untuk Siswa Kelas VII SMP. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 2(10), 1399–1408.
Fitriani, S., & Yarmayani, A. (2018). Pengembangan Rubrik Berpikir Kreatif Siswa Menengah Atas dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematika. Jurnal Mosharafa, 7(1), 33-38.
Furze, J., Gale, J. R., Black, L., Cochran, T. M., & Jensen, G. M. (2015). Clinical Reasoning : Development of a Grading Rubric for Student Assessment. Journal of Physical Therapy Education, 29(3).
Hermawan, Siahaan, P., Suhendi, E., Kaniawati, I., Samsudin, A., Setyadin, A. H., & Hidayat, S. R. (2017). Desain Rubrik Kemampuan Berkolaborasi Siswa SMP dalam Materi Pemantulan Cahaya. JPPPF - Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 3(2005), 167–174.
Jönsson, A., & Panadero, E. (2017). The Use and Design of Rubrics to Support Assessment for Learning. In Scaling up Assessment for Learning in Higher Education, The Enabling Power of Assessment 5 (pp. 99–111). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3045-1
Latifa, A., Rahman, A., Hamra, A., Jabu, B., & Nur, R. (2015). Developing a Practical Rating Rubric of SpeakingTest for University Students of English in Parepare , Indonesia. English Language Teaching, 8(6), 166–177. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v8n6p166
Mckeown, J., & Biss, D. L. (2018). HEQCO ’ s Guide to Developing Valid and Reliable Rubrics. Toronto: Higher Education Quality Council of Ontario.
Mislevy, R. J., & Knowles, T. (2002). Performance Assessments for Adult Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
O’Donnell, J. A., Oakley, M., Haney, S., O’Neill, P. N., & Taylor, D. (2011). Rubrics 101: A Primer for Rubric Development in Dental Education. Journal of Dental Education, 75(September), 1163–1175.
Rahmawan, E. F., Sumaryanto, T., & Suproyadi. (2016). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Kinerja Kemampuan Bernyanyi Berbasis Android. Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation, 5(1), 81–89.
Rakedzon, T., & Tsabari, A. B. (2017). Assessing Writing to Make a Long Story Short : A Rubric for Assessing Graduate Students ’ Academic and Popular Science Writing Skills. Assessing Writing, 32, 28–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2016.12.004
Sweeney, N. L., Rollins, M. C., Gantt, L., Swanson, M., & Ravitz, J. (2019). Development and Reliability Testing of the Sweeney-Clark Simulation Evaluation Rubric Ó. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2019.04.002
Tam, C. O. (2017). Evaluating Students ’ Performance in Responding to Art : The Development and Validation of an Art Criticism Assessment Rubric. The International Journal of Art & Design Education, 0.0. https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12154
Zainul, A. (2001). Alternative Assesment. Jakarta: PAU-PPAI Universitas Terbuka.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v6i3.14557
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Ijang Permana Sidik, Murti Kusuma Wirasti, Eveline Siregar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan Journal of Education: Theory, Research, and Development Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang
|
