Email this article 
Model Mental Siswa dalam Argument Driven Inquiry Berbasis Fenomena Disertai Penilaian Formatif pada Materi Hukum Newton
Abstract
Abstract: The purpose of this study is to describe students' mental models in phenomenon-based Argument Driven Inquiry (ADI) learning with formative assessment. This research uses quantitative and qualitative approaches with mixed methods of embedded experimental model design. The subject was taken from X IPA-1 with 26 students at Pademawu 1 Public High School. The instrument was developed in the form of 6 essay questions. Research data were analyzed using t-paired test, N-gain, and effect size. The results are categorized as surface, matching, and deep type of mental models. It is found that the phenomenon-based ADI accompanied formative assessment affect significantly on the mental models of students with an effect size of 1.86. It is also reveald that the improvement of students' mental models is low category with an N-gain of 0.2.
Abstrak: Tujuan penelitian adalah mendiskripsikan model mental siswa dalam pembelajaran Argument Driven Inquiry (ADI) berbasis fenomena disertai penilaian formatif. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dan kualitatif dengan mixed method desain embedded experimental model. Subjek penelitian X IPA-1 dengan 26 siswa di SMAN 1 Pademawu. Instrumen penelitian berupa enam soal uraian. Data penelitian dianalisis dengan menggunakan t-paired test, N-gain, dan effect size. Hasil penelitian dikategorikan dalam tiga tipe model mental surface, matching, dan deep. Hasil penilitian didapatkan bahwa ADI berbasis fenomena disertai penilaian formatif berpengaruh kuat terhadap model mental siswa dengan nilai effect size 1.86. Selain itu diperoleh informasi bahwa peningkatan model mental siswa dalam kategori rendah dengan nilai N-gain 0.2.Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Askell‐Williams, H., Murray‐Harvey, R., Lawson, M. J. (2007). Teacher Education Students’ Reflections on How Problem-Based Learning has Changed their Mental Models about Teaching and Learning. Teaching Education, 42, 237–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/08878730709555406
Azita Seyed., Fadaei., & Cesar, M. (2015). An Investigation About Misconception in Force and Motion in High School. USchina Education Review, 5(1), 38—45.
Aviani, I., Erceg, N., Mešić, V. (2015). Drawing and Using Free Body Diagrams: Why it May be Better Not to Decompose Forces. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.11.020137
Batlolona, J. R., Diantoro, M., Wartono., Leasa, M. (2020). Students’ Mental Models of Solid Elasticity: Mixed Method Study. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 17(2), 200-210. doi: 10.36681/tused.2020.21
Box, C. (2019). Formative Assessment in United States Classrooms: Changing the Landscape of Teaching and Learning. Switzerland: Sprinnger.
Chittleborough, G. D., Treagust, D. F., Mamiala, T. L., Mocerino, M. (2005). Students’ Perceptions of the Role of Models in The Process of Science and in The Process of Learning. Research in Science & Technological Education, 23(2), 195–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635140500266484
Corpuz, E. D., & Rebello, N.S. (2011). Investigating Students’ Mental Models and Knowledge Construction of Microscopic Friction II Implications for Curriculum Design and Development. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.7.020103
Docktor, J.L., & Mestre, J. P. (2014). Synthesis of Discipline-Based Education Research in Physics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.10.020119
Furtak, E. M. Ruiz-Primo, M. A. Shemwell, J. T. Ayala, C. C. Brandon, P. R. Shavelson, R. J., & Yin, Y. (2008). On the Fidelity of Implementing Embedded Formative Assessments and Its Relation to Student Learning. Applied Measurement in Education, 21(4), 361-389. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957340802347852.
Glick, M.B., Chermack, T. J., Luckel, H., & Gauck, B.Q. (2012). Effects of Scenario Planning on Participant Mental Models. European Journal of Training and Development, 36(5), 488-507 https://doi.org/10.1108/03090591211232066
Hasnunidah, N. (2016). Pengaruh Argument Driven Inquiry dengan Scaffolding terhadap Keterampilan Argumentasi dan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis dan Pemahaman Konsep Biologi Dasar Mahasiswa Jurusan Pendidikan MIPA Universitas Lampung. Disertasi tidak diterbitkan. Univesitas Negeri Malang.
Ifenthaler, D., Pirnay-Dummer, P., & Spector, J. M. (2008). Understanding Models for Learning and Instruction. New York: Springer Science & Business Media, LLC.
Itza-Ortiz, S. F., Rebello, S., & Zollman, D. (2004). Students’ Models of Newton’s Second Law in Mechanics and Electromagnetism. European Journal of Physics, 25(1), 81–89. DOI:10.1088/0143-0807/25/1/011
James, M. (2017). Embedding Formative Assessment in Classroom Practice, in: Maclean, R. (Ed.), Life in Schools and Classrooms. Springer Singapore, Singapore, pp. 509–525. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3654-5_31
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2013). Mental Models and Cognitive Change. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25(2), 131–138. DOI:10.1080/20445911.2012. 759935
Kohl, P. B., & Finkelstein, N. D. (2008). Patterns of Multiple Representation Use by Experts and Novices During Physics Problem Solving. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.4.010111
Kurniasari, I. S., & Setyarsih, W. (2017). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Argument Driven Inquiry (ADI) untuk Melatihkan Kemampuan Argumentasi Ilmiah Siswa pada Materi Usaha dan Energi. Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika, 6(3), 171-174.
Kim, S. M., & Hannafin, M. J. (2016). Synergies: Effects of Source Representation and Goal Instructions on Evidence Quality, Reasoning, and Conceptual Integration during Argumentation-Driven Inquiry. Instructional Science, 44(5), 441–476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-016-9381-1
Lin, J., & Chiu, M. (2007). Exploring the Characteristics and Diverse Sources of Students’ Mental Models of Acids and Bases. International Journal of Science Education, 29(6), 771–803. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600855559
Morgan, G. A., Nancy. L. L., Gene. W. G., Karen. C. B. (2004). SPSS for Introductory Statistics Use and Interpretation Second Edition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: New Jersey. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410610539
Ozcan, O., & Bezen, S. (2016). Students’ Mental Models About the Relationship Between Force and Velocity Conce. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 15(6), 630-641.
Purnamasari, I., Yuliati, L., & Diantoro, M. (2018). Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah dan Model Mental Siswa pada Materi Fluida Statis. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 3(10), 1299—1302.
Pareken, M., Patandean, A. J., & Palloan, P. (2015). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Fenomena Terhadap Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis dan Hasil Belajar Fisika Peserta Didik Kelas X SMA Negeri 2 Rantepao Kabupaten Toraja Utara. Jurnal Sains dan Pendidikan Fisika, 11(3), 214-221.
Priyadi, R., Diantoro, M., Parno., & Taqwa, M. R. A. (2020). Using Argument-Driven Inquiry Learning to Improve Students’ Mental Models. Presented at the 28th Russian Conference on Mathematical Modelling in Natural Sciences, Perm, Russia, p. 050011. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0000569
Pablico, J. R. (2010). Misconceptions on Force and Gravity among High School Student. Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College.
Rahayu, S., & Purwanto, J. (2013). Identifikasi Model Mental Siswa SMA Kelas X pada Materi Hukum Newton tentang Gerak. KAUNIA Journal, 9(2), 12-20.
Rosenblatt, R., & Heckler, A. F. (2011). Systematic Study of Student Understanding of the Relationships Between the Directions of Force, Velocity, and Acceleration in One Dimension. Physical Review Special Topics-physics Education Research. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.7.020112
Sutopo., Liliasari., Waldrip, B., & Rusdiana, D. (2012). The Need of Representation Approach to Provide Prospective Physics Teacher with Better Reasoning Ability and Conceptual Understanding. Surabaya: 5th International Seminar of Science Education.
Sari, A. L. R., Parno., & Taufiq, A. (2018). Pemahaman Konsep dan Kesulitan Siswa SMA pada Materi Hukum Newton. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 3(10), 1323-1330.
Yin, Y., Tomita, M. K., & Shavelson, R. J. (2014). Using Formal Embedded Formative Assessments Aligned with a Short-Term Learning Progression to Promote Conceptual Change and Achievement in Science. International Journal of Science Education, 36(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.787556
Walker, J. P., Sampson, V., Grooms, J., Anderson, B., & Zimmerman, C. O. (2012). Argument-Driven Inquiry in Undergraduate Chemistry Labs: The Impact on Students’ Conceptual Understanding, Argument Skills, and Attitudes Toward Science. Journal of College Science Teaching, 41(4), 82.
Zhou, S., Zhang, C., & Xiao, H. (2015). Students’ Understanding on Newton’s Third Law in Identifying the Reaction Force in Gravity Interactions. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science, & Technology Education, 11(3), 589-599 https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1337a
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v6i3.14626
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Jamiatul Mufidah, Parno Parno, Markus Diantoro
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan Journal of Education: Theory, Research, and Development Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang
|
