Tindak Tutur Ekspresif dalam Debat Calon Pemimpin Bangsa Indonesia Tahun 2019

Yulmi Hartinah, Abdul Syukur Ibrahim, Gatut Susanto

Abstract


Abstract: The purprose of this studi is to describe the form, function, and strategies of expressive speech in the 2019 presidential election debate. Using a qualitative approach with this type of pragmatic research. The data is in the form of expressive speech in the 2019 presidential election debate video which has been written language along with the context. The data studied were in the form of speech in the 2019 presidential election debate which included the form, fungction, and strategi of delivery expressive speech. The data source in this study is the 2019 presidential election debate video downloaded via youtube. Based on the data analysis, three things were concluded. First, there are four forms of expressive speech, namely anger, criticism, praise, and expression of desire. Second, the function of expressive speech includes expressing annoyance, offense, protesting, regretting, evaluating, feeling proud, gratitude, acceptance, hope, and belief. Third, direct and indirect delivery strategies.

Abstrak: Tujuan penelitian ini mendeskripsikan wujud, fungsi, dan strategi tuturan ekspresif dalam debat pilpres 2019. Menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan jenis penelitian pragmatik. Data berupa tuturan ekspresif di video debat pilpres tahun 2019 yang telah di bahasa tuliskan beserta konteksnya. Data yang diteliti berupa tuturan dalam debat pilpres 2019 yang meliputi wujud, fungsi, dan strategi penyampaian tuturan ekspresif. Sumber data video debat pilpres 2019 yang diunduh melalui youtube. Berdasarkan analisis data disimpulkan tiga hal. Pertama, ditemukan empat wujud tuturan ekspresif, yaitu marah, kritik, pujian, dan pengungkapan keinginan. Kedua, fungsi tuturan ekspresif meliputi mengungkapkan rasa kesal, rasa tersinggung, memprotes, menyayangkan, mengevaluasi, rasa bangga, rasa syukur, penerimaan, harapan, dan keyakinan. Ketiga, strategi penyampaian secara langsung dan tidak langsung.

Keywords


speech acts expressive; the presidential debate; form; function; strategy. tindak tutur ekspresif; debat pilpres; wujud; fungsi; strategi

Full Text:

PDF

References


Agung Tribawa, I. G. N., Putra Yadnya, I. B., & Ida Setianingsih, K. A. (2018). Declarative and Interrogative Sentences in The Film “American Sniper.” Humanis, 22(1985), 950. https://doi.org/10.24843/jh.2018.v22.i04.p16

Al Falasi, H. (2007). Just Say Thank You: A Study of Compliment Responses. The Linguistics Journal , 2(1), 28-42.

Alwi, H., Dardjowidjojo, S., & Lapoliwa, H. (2000). Tata Bahasa Baku Bahasa Indonesia Edisi Ketiga. Balai Pustaka: Jakarta.

Arifin, A. (2011). Komunikasi Politik: Filsafat, Paradigma, Teori Tujuan, Strategi, dan Komunikasi Politik Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Bayat, N. (2013). Akdeniz Language Studies Conference 2012. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 213–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.01.057

Boydstun, A. E., Glazier, R. A., & Phillips, C. (2013). Agenda Control in the 2008 Presidential Debates. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X12472364

Carretero, M., Maíz-Arévalo, C., & Martínez, M. Á. (2015). An Analysis of Expressive Speech Acts in Online Task-Oriented Interaction by University Students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 173, 186–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.051

Chaer, A. (2010). Kesantunan Berbahasa. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Dedaić, M. N. (2006). Political Speeches and Persuasive Argumentation. Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics, 700–707. https://doi.org/10.1016/b0-08-044854-2/00721-5

Fracchiolla, B. (2011). Politeness as a Strategy of Attack in A Gendered Political Debate-The Royal-Sarkozy Debate. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(10), 2480–2488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.02.006

Gibson, J., Claassen, C., & Barceló, J. (2019). Deplorables : Emotions, Political Sophistication, and Political Intolerance. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X18820864

Goleman, D. (2009). Kecerdasan Emosional: Mengapa EI Lebih Penting daripada IQ. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Hall, D. (2011). Debate : Innovative Teaching to Enhance Critical Thinking and Communication Skills in Healthcare Professionals. 9, 16–19.

Hermaji, B. (2013). Tindak Tutur Penerimaan dan Penolakan dalam Bahasa Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan, 7(1), 1–10. http://e-journal.upstegal.ac.id/index.php/Cakrawala/article/view/305

Hess, L. (2018). Perspectival expressives. Journal of Pragmatics, 129, 13–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.02.007

Hosseinizadeh, S. H., & Rassaei Moqadam, H. (2019). Criticism Strategies and Their Underlying Cultural Norms in Online Interactions: A Study of Native Speakers of Persian and English. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 12(3), 267–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/17513057.2018.1558273

Husain, A., & Nurhayani, I. (2020). Commissive Speech Act In Indonesian Presidential Debate. 14(1). https://doi.org/10.19105/ojbs.v14i1.3141

Isotalus, P. (2017). Analyzing Presidential Debates. Nordicom Review, 32(1), 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1515/nor-2017-0103

Jazeri, M. (2018). Communication Culture in Political Debate in Indonesia. KnE Social Sciences, 3(9), 364. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i9.2698

Keltner, D., Sauter, D., Tracy, J., & Cowen, A. (2019). Emotional Expression: Advances in Basic Emotion Theory. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-019-00293-3

Manik, S., & Hutagaol, J. (2015). An Analysis on Teachers’ Politeness Strategy and Student’s Compliance in Teaching Learning Process at SD Negeri 024184 Binjai Timur Binjai –North Sumatra-Indonesia. English Language Teaching, 8(8), 152–170. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v8n8p152

Miles, M. B., & Hubarman, A. M. (2014). Analisis Data Kualitatif. Jakarta: UI: Press.

Rais, B., & Triyono, S. (2019). Pragmatic Analysis of Speech Acts on The Video of Prabowo Vs Jokowi - Epic Rap Battles of Presidency. Ijllt, 2(3), 150–157. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijllt.2019.2.3.17

Riana, A., Tambunan, S., & Sitinjak, V. N. (2018). Expressive Speech Acts in Ellen Show “ An Interview with Ed Sheeran .” 8(4), 138–144. https://doi.org/10.30845/ijhss.v8n4p20

Riemer, N., & Foolen, A. (2017). Expressives. 15123. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315685533.ch27

Rizza, C. (2009). Semantically Redundant Language — A Case Study. April, 276–294. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp009

Ronan, P. (2015). Categorizing Expressive Speech Acts in The Pragmatically Annotated SPICE Ireland Corpus. ICAME Journal, 39(1), 25–45. https://doi.org/10.1515/icame-2015-0002

Rosyidi, A. Z. (2019). International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding Illocutionary Speech Acts Use by Jokowidodo in First Indonesia Presidential Election Debate 2019. 735–740.

Vita Handayani, N. (2015). the Use of Expressive Speech Acts in Hannah Montana Session 1. Register Journal, 8(1), 99. https://doi.org/10.18326/rgt.v8i1.99-112

Yule, G. (2006). Pragmatik. Yogyakarta: Pustaka.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v6i3.14627

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Yulmi Hartinah, Abdul Syukur Ibrahim, Gatut Susanto

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

JPtpp is accredited “Rank 3” as a scientific journal under the decree of the Directorate General of Research Enhancement and Development, Ministry of Research, Technology, and Higher Education, dated December 7, 2022, No: 225/E/KPT/2022, effective for five years from Volume 7 Issue 8, 2022 until Volume 12 Issue 7, 2027. Link to download

Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan

Journal of Education: Theory, Research, and Development

Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang

Lisensi Creative Commons

JPtpp is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License