Email this article 
Eksplorasi Kemampuan Scientific Reasoning Materi Hukum Newton Siswa SMA
Abstract
Abstract: Newton's law which is the focus of physics material next requires high scientific reasoning skill. This article is a survey research conducted on 207 students with descriptive quantitative methods. This study aims to explore patterns and levels of scientific reasoning of students in Newton's law. The instrument used is the development of MLCTSR (Modified Lawson Classroom Test Scientific Reasoning) in the form of 15 items (reability 0.828) that were adjusted to Newton's law. The results of research shows that the TM category dominated almost all pattern of SR. The highest SR mastery is on the PBR pattern while the lowest is on the HDR pattern. Overall, 33% of students are at a concrete operational level, 53% at the transition level, and only 14% of students at the formal operational level. From these results it can be concluded that the pattern and level of SR of students in newton’s law were still relatively low.
Abstrak: Materi hukum newton yang menjadi fokus dalam materi fisika selanjutnya membutuhkan kemampuan scientific reasoning yang tinggi. Artikel ini merupakan penelitian survei yang dilakukan pada 207 siswa dengan metode kuantitatif deskriptif. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengeksplorasi pola dan level scientific reasoning siswa pada materi hukum Newton. Instrumen yang digunakan adalah pengembangan MLCTSR (Modified Lawson Classroom Test Scientific Reasoning) berupa 15 soal (reabilitas 0,828) yang disesuaikan dengan materi hukum newton. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kategori TM mendominasi hampir semua pola SR siswa. Penguasaan SR tertinggi berada pada pola PBR sedangkan yang terendah berada pada pola HDR. Secara keseluruhan, 33% siswa berada pada level operasional konkret, 53% pada level transisi, dan hanya 14% siswa pada level operasional formal. Dari hasil tersebut disimpulkan bahwa pola dan level kemampuan SR siswa pada materi hukum newton masih tergolong rendah.Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adi, H., Karplus, R., Lawson, A., & Pulos, S. (1978). Intellectual Development Beyond Elementary School VI: Correlational Reasoning. School Science and Mathematics, 78(8), 675–683. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1978.tb18270.x
Aini, N., Subiki., & Supriadi, B. (2018). Identifikasi Kemampuan Penalaran Ilmiah (Scientific Reasoning) Siswa SMA di Kabupaten Jember Pada Pokok Bahasan Dinamika. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Fisika 2018, 121–126.
Andani, I. D., Prastowo, S. H. B., & Supeno. (2018). Identifikasi Kemampuan Penalaran Hipotesis-Deduktif Siswa SMA dalam Pembelajaran Fisika Materi Hukum Newton. Seminar Nasional Quantum, 25, 562–568.
Balqis, D., Kusairi, S., & Supriana, E. (2019). Analisis Kemampuan Penalaran Ilmiah pada Pembelajaran Interactive Demonstration disertai Formative Assessment. Jurnal Pendidikan : Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 4(11), 1485–1490.
Cheong, Y. W., Ha, S., Byun, T., & Lee, G. (2019). Two Patterns of Student Reasoning in Problem Solving Concerning Frictional Force. Physics Education, 54(2). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/aaf6f9
Ding, L., Wei, X., & Liu, X. (2016). Variations in University Students’ Scientific Reasoning Skills Across Majors, Years, and Types of Institutions. Research in Science Education, 46(5). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-015-9473-y
Erlina, N., Susantini, E., & Wasis, W. (2018). Common False of Student’s Scientific Reasoning in Physics Problems. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1108(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1108/1/012016
Erlina, Nia, Supeno, & Wicaksono, I. (2017). Penalaran Ilmiah dalam Pembelajaran Fisika. Seminar Nasional Fisika.
Fabby, C., & Koenig, K. M. (2014). Relationship of Scientific Reasoning to Solving Different Physics Problem Types. Physics Education Research, 141–144. https://doi.org/10.1119/perc.2013.pr.023
Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Ufer, S., Sodian, B., & Hussmann, H. (2014). Scientific Reasoning and Argumentation: Advancing an Interdisciplinary Research Agenda in Education. Frontline Learning Research, 2(3), 28–45. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v2i2.96
Hartmann, S., Upmeier Zu Belzen, A., Krüger, D., & Pant, H. A. (2015). Scientific Reasoning in Higher Education: Constructing and Evaluating the Criterion-Related Validity of an Assessment of Preservice Science Teachers’ Competencies. Zeitschrift Fur Psychologie / Journal of Psychology, 223(1), 47–53. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000199
Karplus, E. F., & Karplus, R. (1969). Intellectual Development Beyond Elementary School: Deductive Logic. School Science and Mathematics, 398–406.
Karplus, R. (1977). A Survey of Proportional Reasoning and Control of Variables in Seven Countries. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 14(5), 411–417.
Khoirina, M., Cari, C., & Sukarmin. (2018). Identify Students’ Scientific Reasoning Ability at Senior High School. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1097(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1097/1/012024
Kind, P., & Osborne, J. (2017). Styles of Scientific Reasoning: A Cultural Rationale for Science Education? Science Education, 101(1), 8–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21251
Lawson, Anton E. (1976). M-Space : Is It a Constraint on Conservation Reasoning Ability ? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 22, 40–49.
Lawson, Anton E. (2010). Basic Inferences of Scientific Reasoning, Argumentation, and Discovery. Science Education, 94(2), 336–364. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20357
Lawson, Anton E., Clark, B., Cramer-meldrum, E., Falconer, K. A., Sequist, J. M., & Kwon, Y. (2000). Development of Scientific Reasoning in College Biology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(1), 81–101.
Lawson, Antone E. (2004). The nature and development of scientific reasoning: A synthetic view. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2(3), 307–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-004-3224-2
Lingga, A., Sari, R., & Taufiq, A. (2018). Pemahaman Konsep dan Kesulitan Siswa SMA pada Materi Hukum Newton. Jurnal Pendidikan : Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 3(10), 1323–1330.
Moore, J. C., & Rubbo, L. J. (2012). Scientific Reasoning Abilities of Nonscience Majors in Physics-Based Courses. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 8(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010106
Novia, N., & Riandi, R. (2017). The analysis of students scientific reasoning ability in solving the modified lawson classroom test of scientific reasoning (MLCTSR) problems by applying the levels of inquiry. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 6(1), 116–122. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v6i1.9600
Nurhayati, N., Yuliati, L., & Mufti, N. (2016). Pola Penalaran Ilmiah dan Kemampuan Penyelesaian Masalah Sintesis Fisika. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 1(8), 1594–1597.
Purwanti, S., Handayanto, S. K., & Zulaikah, S. (2016). Korelasi Antara Penalaran Ilmiah dan Pemahaman Konsep Siswa pada Materi Usaha dan Energi. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan IPA Pascasarjana UM, 1.
Rimadani, E., Parno., & Diantoro, M. (2017). Identifikasi Kemampuan Penalaran Ilmiah Siswa SMA pada Materi Suhu dan Kalor. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 2(6), 833–839.
Serway, R. A., & Jewett, J. W. (2013). Physic for Scientists and Engineers 9th Edition. In Physical Sciences: Mary Finch.
Stammen, A. N., Malone, K. L., & Irving, K. E. (2018). Effects of Modeling Instruction Professional Development on Biology Teachers ’ Scientific Reasoning Skills. Education Sciences, 8(199), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8030119
Susiana, N., Yuliati, L., & Latifah, E. (2018). Pengaruh Interactive Demonstration terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Siswa Kelas X pada Materi Hukum Newton. Pendidikan, 3(3), 312–315.
Sutarno. (2014). Profil Penalaran Ilmiah (Scientific Reasoning) Mahasiswa Program Studi Pendidikan Fisika Universitas Bengkulu Tahun Akademik 2013/2014. Seminar Nasional dan Rapat Tahunan Bidang MIPA 2014, (7), 361–371.
Taufiq. (2017). Eksperimen Berpikir (Thought Experiments); Beberapa Kasus dalam Hukum Newton. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan IPA 2017, 150–162.
Wardani, P. O., Supeno, & Subiki. (2018). Identifikasi Kemampuan Penalaran Ilmiah Siswa SMK tentang Rangkaian Listrik pada Pembelajaran Fisika. Seminar Nasional Fisika 2018 “Implementasi Pendidikan Karakter dan IPTEK Untuk Generasi Milenial Indonesia Dalam Menuju SDGs 2030,” 3, 183–188.
Yuwarti, Pasaribu, M., & Hatibe, A. (2017). Analisis Pemahaman Konsep Siswa SMA Lab-School Palu pada Materi Hukum Newton. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Tadulako (JPFT), 5(3), 36–41.
Zafitri, T. S., Siahaan, P., & Liliawati, W. (2019). Design of Scientific Reasoning Test Instruments on Simple Harmonic Motion Topics. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(64). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/3/032064
Zhou, S., Han, J., Koenig, K., Raplinger, A., Pi, Y., Li, D., … Bao, L. (2016). Assessment of Scientific Reasoning: The Effects of Task Context, Data, and Design on Student Reasoning in Control of Variables. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 19, 175–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2015.11.004
Zimmerman, C. (2007). The Development of Scientific Thinking Skills in Elementary and Middle School. Developmental Review, 27(2), 172–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2006.12.001
Zimmerman, C., & Klahr, D. (2018). Development of Scientific Thinking. In Stevens’ Handbook of Experimental Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience (pp. 1–25). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119170174.epcn407
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v6i4.14694
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Annisa Ulfa Yana, Supriyono Koes Handayanto, Titik Wuryanti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan Journal of Education: Theory, Research, and Development Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang
|
