Email this article 
Eksplorasi Scientific Explanation Berdasarkan Tingkat Kemampuan Peserta Didik
Abstract
Abstract: This descriptive quantitative study aims to discern students' scientific explanation skills. The researcher took 76 students from Senior High School 3,4, and Islamic Senior High School 1 in Malang city as samples. Six essay questions with coefficient reliability 0.6 were used as instruments in this study. The findings show that high initial ability of students' reasoning skills was very good due to the fact that they could associate claim and evidence. Meanwhile, students with low initial ability relied upon their instinct in constructing the evidence; therefore, theie reasoning skill was low.
Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui kemampuan scientific explanation peserta didik. Penelitian ini berupa kuantitatif deskriptif dengan sampel sebanyak 76 peserta didik yang berasal dari SMA Negeri 3 dan 4, serta MAN 1 di Malang. Penggunaan instrumen berupa soal uraian sebanyak enam soal yang memperoleh koefisien reliabilitas 0,6. Kemampuan reasoning peserta didik pada ketgori kemampuan awal tinggi sangat baik karena peserta didik sudah mampu menghubungkan claim dan evidence. Peserta didik kemampuan awal rendah masih mengandalkan insting daripada data dan bukti dalam menyusun evidence sehingga mereka memiliki reasoning yang masih rendah.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Chinn, C. A., & Brewer, W. F. (2001). Models of Data: A Theory of How People Evaluate Data. Cognition and Instruction, 19(3), 323–393. Https://Doi.Org/10.1207/S1532690xci1903_3
De La Chica, S. (2007). Scinews Online: Scaffolding The Construction of Scientific Explanations. Chi ’07 Extended Abstracts On Human Factors in Computing Systems-Chi ’07, 2183. Https://Doi.Org/10.1145/1240866.1240977
Dochy, F., De Rijdt, C., & Dyck, W. (2002). Cognitive Prerequisites and Learning: How Far Have We Progressed Since Bloom? Implications for Educational Practice and Teaching. Active Learning in Higher Education, 3(3), 265–284. Https://Doi.Org/10.1177/1469787402003003006
Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing The Norms of Scientific Argumentation in Classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287–312. Https://Doi.Org/10.1002/(Sici)1098-237x(200005)84:3<287::Aid-Sce1>3.0.Co;2-A
Hogan, K., & Maglienti, M. (2001). Comparing The Epistemological Underpinnings of Students’ and Scientists’ Reasoning About Conclusions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(6), 663–687. Https://Doi.Org/10.1002/Tea.1025
Hsu, C.-C., Chiu, C.-H., Lin, C.-H., & Wang, T. I. (2015). Enhancing Skill in Constructing Scientific Explanations Using A Structured Argumentation Scaffold In Scientific Inquiry. Computers & Education, 91, 46–59. Https://Doi.Org/10.1016/J.Compedu.2015.09.009
Mcneill, K. L. (2009). Teachers’ Use of Curriculum to Support Students in Writing Scientific Arguments to Explain Phenomena. Science Education, 93(2), 233–268. Https://Doi.Org/10.1002/Sce.20294
Mcneill, K. L., Lizotte, D. J., Krajcik, J., & Marx, R. W. (2006). Supporting Students’ Construction of Scientific Explanations by Fading Scaffolds in Instructional Materials. Journal Of The Learning Sciences, 15(2), 153–191. Https://Doi.Org/10.1207/S15327809jls1502_1
Ningsi, S., Suhandi, A., Kaniawati, I., & Samsudin, A. (2019). Ktg-Sesc: Development of Scientific Explanation Skills Test Instrument. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157, 032050. Https://Doi.Org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/3/032050
Oktavianti, E., Handayanto, S. K., Wartono, W., & Saniso, E. (2018). Students’ Scientific Explanation in Blended Physics Learning with E-Scaffolding. Jurnal Pendidikan Ipa Indonesia, 7(2), 181–186. Https://Doi.Org/10.15294/Jpii.V7i2.14232
Osborne, J., Collins, S., Ratcliffe, M., Millar, R., & Duschl, R. (2003). What? Ideas-About-Science? Should Be Taught in School Science? A Delphi Study of the Expert Community. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(7), 692–720. Https://Doi.Org/10.1002/Tea.10105
Rahmat, M. H., Patmanthara, S., & Soekopitojo, S. (2016). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran dan Kemampuan Awal Terhadap Hasil Belajar Teknik Permesinan Frais Siswa SMK. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 1(5), 785-795.
Sadler, T. D. (2004). Informal Reasoning Regarding Socioscientific Issues: A Critical Review of Research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 513–536. Https://Doi.Org/10.1002/Tea.20009
Sampson, V., Grooms, J., & Walker, J. P. (2011). Argument-Driven Inquiry as A Way to Help Students Learn How to Participate in Scientific Argumentation and Craft Written Arguments: An Exploratory Study. Science Education, 95(2), 217–257. Https://Doi.Org/10.1002/Sce.20421
Suhandi, A., Muslim, Samsudin, A., Hermita, N., & Supriyatman. (2018). Effectiveness of The Use of Question-Driven Levels of Inquiry Based Instruction (Qd-Loibi) Assisted Visual Multimedia Supported Teaching Material on Enhancing Scientific Explanation Ability Senior High School Students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1013, 012026. Https://Doi.Org/10.1088/1742-6596/1013/1/012026
Tang, K. S., & Putra, G. B. S. (2018). Infusing Literacy into an Inquiry Instructional Model to Support Students’ Construction of Scientific Explanations. In K. S. Tang & K. Danielsson (Eds.), Global Developments in Literacy Research for Science Education (Pp. 281–300). Springer International Publishing. Https://Doi.Org/10.1007/978-3-319-69197-8_17
Wang, C.-Y. (2015). Scaffolding Middle School Students’ Construction of Scientific Explanations: Comparing A Cognitive Versus a Metacognitive Evaluation Approach. International Journal of Science Education, 37(2), 237–271. Https://Doi.Org/10.1080/09500693.2014.979378
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v6i5.14756
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Hernita A, Supriyono Koes Handayanto, Edi Supriana
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan Journal of Education: Theory, Research, and Development Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang
|
