Email this article 
Speaking Performance and Grammatical Competence Across Cognitive Learning Styles and Strategy Inventory for Language Learning
Abstract
Abstract: This study examines the correlation between speaking performance and grammatical competence, particularly in the EFL context, by including cognitive learning styles and the Strategy Inventory for Language Learning (SILL). The correlational study is employed to analyze the scores of argumentative speaking and written grammar tests of 30 Economics students at STIE Malangkuceswara Malang. It is found that there is no significant correlation between speaking performance and grammatical competence. However, FI students outperformed in speaking, and FD students surpassed in grammar. In fact, those who scored higher on both tests used more SILLs than those who scored lower.
Abstrak: Penelitian ini merupakan upaya untuk melihat hubungan antara kemampuan berbicara dan kompetensi gramatikal, khususnya dalam konteks EFL dengan memasukkan gaya belajar kognitif dan Strategy Inventory for Language Learning (SILL). Studi korelasional digunakan untuk menganalisis nilai tes berbicara argumentatif dan tata bahasa tertulis pada 30 mahasiswa Ilmu Ekonomi STIE Malangkuceswara Malang. Diketahui bahwa tidak ada korelasi yang signifikan antara kinerja berbicara dan kompetensi tata bahasa. Namun, siswa FI unggul dalam berbicara dan siswa FD melampaui dalam tata bahasa. Faktanya, mereka yang mendapat skor lebih tinggi pada kedua tes menggunakan lebih banyak SILL dibandingkan mereka yang mendapat skor lebih rendah.Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alanen, R. (1995). Input Enhancement and Rule Presentation in Second Language Acquisition. In In attention and Awareness in Foreign Language Learning (pp. 259–302). University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.
Anggrainni, R. N. (2016). Autonomous EFL Learners’ Learning Styles and Strategies to Learn English Speaking Skill. In Thesis. State University of Malang.
Ararso, N. (2012). The English Grammar Learning Strategies of High and Low Ranking Grade Ten Students Jiren Secondary School: a Comparative Study. Jimma University. https://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/handle/123456789/ 6922
Carver, D. (1984). Plans, Learner Strategies, and Self Direction in Language Learning. Elsevier, 2(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(84)90022-8.
Chapelle, C., & Green, P. (1992). Field independence/dependence in second‐language acquisition research. Language Learning, 42(1), 47–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1992.tb00700.x.
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax Cambridge. In Multilingual Matters: MIT Press. MIT Press.
Cohen, A. D., Oxford, R. L., & Chi, J. C. (2006). Learning style survey: Assessing your learning styles. In Styles and Strategies-based Instruction: A Teachersʼ Guide. , MN: Center for Advanced Research on Language Acquisition. (pp. 15–21). University of Minnesota. http://carla.acad.umn.edu/profiles/Cohen-profile.html.
Cohen, A., & Pinilla-Herrera, A. (2010). Communicating Grammatically: Constructing A Learner Strategies Website for Spanish. A New Look at Language Teaching and Testing: English as Subject and Vehicle, 63–83.
De Graaff, R. (1997). The Experanto Experiment: Effects of Explicit Instruction on Second Language Acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 249–276.
Dornyei, Z. (2005). The Psychology of the Language Learner: Individual Differences in Second Language Acquisition. In New Jersey Mahwah. US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Entwistle, N. (2001). Styles of Learning and Approaches to Studying in Higher Education. Kybernetes, 5(6), 593–603. https://doi.org/10.1108/03684920110391823
He, H. (2013). On FL learners’ Individual Differences in Grammar Learning and Their Grammatical Competence Training. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(8), 1369–1374. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.3.8.1369-1374
Hidayatullah, S. (2018). The Correlation Between Students’grammar Mastery And Their Speaking Accuracyat The First Semester of the Tenth Grade of SMAN 01 Lemong Pesisir Barat in the Academic Year of 2016/2017. UIN Raden Intan Lampung.
Hulstijn, J. H., & Hulstijn, W. (1984). Grammatical Errors as a Function of Processing Constraints and Explicit Knowledge. Language Learning, 34(1), 23–43.
Johnson, J., Prior, S., & Artuso, M. (2000). Field Dependence as a Factor in Second Language Communicative Production. Language Learning, 50(3), 529–567. https://doi.org///dx.doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00137
Kamińska, P. M. (2014). Learning Styles and Second Language Education. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Kianiparsa, P., & Vali, S. (2010). The Effect of Grammar Learning on Speaking Ability of EFL Learners. ELT Weekly, 2(53), 7–15.
Kong, N. (2011). Establishing a Comprehensive English Teaching Pattern Combining the Communicative Teaching Method and the Grammar-Translation Method. English Language Teaching, 4(1), 76–78.
Krashen, S. D. (2003). Explorations in Language Acquisition and Use. Heinemann Portsmouth, NH.
Kusumawardani, S. A., & Mardiyani, E. (2018). The Correlation between English Grammar Competence and Speaking Fluency. PROJECT (Professional Journal of English Education), 1(6), 724–733.
Ladouse. (1991). Whole Brain. Oxford University press.
Latief, M. A. (2013). Research Methods on Language Learning: An Introduction. UM Press.
Lee, W.-T. (2010). Correlations between Taiwanese University EFL Learners’ Frequency of Use of Language Learning Strategies and Their Pragmatic Awareness and Grammatical Awareness.
Leeman, J., Arteagoitia, I., Fridman, B., & Doughty, C. (1995). Integrating Attention to Form with Meaning: Focus on Form in Content-Based Spanish Instruction. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (pp. 217–258). University of Hawaii Press.
Lock, G. (1997). Functional English Grammar: An Introduction for Second Language Teachers. Cambridge University Press.
Manley, J. H., & Calk, L. (1997). Grammar Instruction for Writing Skills: Do Students Perceive Grammar as Useful? Foreign Language Annals, 30(1), 73–81.
Master, P. (1994). The Effect of Systematic Instruction on Learning the English Article System. In T. Odlin (Ed.), In Perspectives on Pedagogical Grammar (pp. 229–252). Cambridge university press.
Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M. (2001). Modeling perceptions of the accentedness and comprehensibility of L2 speech: The role of speaking rate. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 451–468.
Musalamat, R. (2018). The correlation between speaking learningstrategies and speaking mastery of english education study program students at IAIN Palangka Raya. IAIN Palangka Raya.
Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language Learning Strategies: What Every Teacher Should Know. Heinle & Heinle.
Oxford, Rebecca L, & Ehrman, M. E. (1995). Adults’ Language Learning Strategies in an Intensive Foreign Language Program in the United States. System, 23(3), 359–386.
Pietrzykowska, A. (2014). The Relationship between Learning Strategies and Speaking Performance. In Classroom-Oriented Research (pp. 55–68). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00188-3_4
Priyanto, A., & L., L. A. (2015). The Correlation Between English Grammar Competence and Speaking Fluency of Eleventh Grade Students in Sman 1 Sidoarjo. 1–6.
Richards, J. C. (2008). Teaching Listening and Speaking. Cambridge University Press.
Salmani-Nodoushan, M. A. (2006). Does Field Independence Relate to Performance on Communicative Language Tests? Research Papers. Manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, 3(3), 79–85.
Sioson, I. C. (2011). Language Learning Strategies, Beliefs, and Anxiety in Academic Speaking Task. Philippine ESL Journal, 7(1), 3–27.
Soozandehfar, S. M. A., & Noroozisiam, E. (2011). Which One Speaks Better? The Field-Dependent or the Field-Independent? Language In India, 11(2).
Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2001). A Capsule History of Theory and Research on Styles. Perspectives on Thinking, Learning, and Cognitive Styles, 1–21.
Straková, Z. (2013). Developing Cognitive Strategies in Foreign Language Education. Journal of Language and Cultural Education, 1(1), 37–50.
Taheri, H., Sadighi, F., Bagheri, M. S., & Bavali, M. (2020). Investigating the Relationship between Iranian EFL Learners’ Use of Language Learning Strategies and Foreign Language Skills Achievement. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 7(1), 1710944. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2019.1710944.
Terrell, T. D., & Krashen, S. (1983). The Natural Approach: Language Acquisition in the Classroom. Prentice Hall.
Wang, X. (2017). The Enlightenment of Cognitive Style Differences between Field Dependent and Field Independent Mode on College English Teaching. International Journal on Studies in English Language a
nd Literature (IJSELL), 5(6), 31–37. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.20431/2347-3134.0506004
Williams, M., & Burden, R. L. (1997). Psychology for Teachers: A Social Constructivist Approach. In Cambridge Language. Cambridge University Press.
Xu, J. (2016). The Relationship Between the Use of Speaking Strategies and Performance on IELTS Speaking Test: A Study on Chinese College Students. International Journal for 21st Century Education, 3(2), 69–96.
Zhou, Z. (2017). The investigation of the English Grammar Learning Strategy of High School Students in China. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 7(12), 1243–1248.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v6i5.14758
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Ayu Chandra Agustin, Ekaning Dewanti Laksmi, Suharyadi Suharyadi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan Journal of Education: Theory, Research, and Development Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang
|
