Email this article 
Persepsi dan Kebutuhan Mahasiswa Calon Guru Biologi terhadap Media Pembelajaran Bioteknologi
Abstract
Abstract: This study aims to reveal the perceptions and needs of pre-service biology teachers on biotechnology learning and their need for instructional media, especially on the topic of basic molecular biology techniques. This descriptive quantitative study was done purposively on 42 students who have completed the biotechnology lectures in Biology Education Program, Universitas Negeri Malang. The data collection instruments consisted of a biotechnology topic difficulty survey questionnaire and a felt needs questionnaire. The questionnaire response data analyzed using descriptive statistics showed that students perceived the laboratory activity of basic molecular biology techniques as a moderate level. On average, all students performed DNA analysis techniques, and only 55% of all students performed protein analysis techniques. Overall, students have feelings, understanding, and confidence at a moderate level, while they feel they have excellent learning assistance. Even so, students feel they need learning resources in the form of research-based multimedia to support learning on the topic of practicum on molecular biology analysis techniques, especially in protein analysis techniques. Research-based protein analysis techniques multimedia that is suitable for students' university cognitive development are considered to be developed in supporting biotechnology learning for pre-service biology teachers.
Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengungkapkan persepsi dan kebutuhan calon guru biologi terhadap pembelajaran bioteknologi dan kebutuhan mereka akan media pembelajaran khususnya pada topik teknik dasar biologi molekuler. Penelitian kuantitatif deskriptif ini dilakukan secara purposive pada 42 mahasiswa yang telah menyelesaikan perkuliahan bioteknologi di Program Studi Pendidikan Biologi Universitas Negeri Malang. Instrumen pengumpulan data terdiri dari kuesioner survei kesulitan topik bioteknologi dan kuesioner kebutuhan yang dirasakan (felt needs). Data tanggapan angket yang dianalisis menggunakan statistik deskriptif menunjukkan bahwa tingkat kesulitan aktivitas laboratorium teknik dasar biologi molekuler dianggap dalam kategori sedang. Rata-rata semua siswa melakukan teknik analisis DNA, dan hanya 55% dari seluruh siswa yang melakukan teknik analisis protein. Secara keseluruhan, siswa memiliki perasaan, pemahaman, dan kepercayaan diri pada tingkat sedang, sementara mereka merasa memiliki bantuan belajar yang sangat baik. Meski begitu, mahasiswa merasa membutuhkan sumber belajar berupa multimedia berbasis penelitian untuk mendukung pembelajaran pada topik praktikum teknik analisis biologi molekuler khususnya teknik analisis protein. Multimedia teknik analisis protein berbasis penelitian yang sesuai untuk perkembangan kognitif mahasiswa dinilai dapat dikembangkan dalam mendukung pembelajaran bioteknologi bagi calon guru biologi.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Acarli, D. S. (2016). Determining Prospective Biology Teachers’ Cognitive Structure in Terms of “Biotechnology.” Journal of Baltic Science Education, 15(4), 494–505.
Afandi, Sajidan, Akhyar, M., & Suryani, N. (2019). Development Frameworks of the Indonesian Partnership 21st Century Skills Standards for Prospective Science Teachers: A Delphi Study. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 8(1), 89–100.
Al-Momani, F. N. (2019). Difficulties in Making Professional Science Teacher in the 21th Century . Difficulties in Making Professional Science Teacher in the 21 th. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education, 7(1), 76–82.
Amin, M., Suarsini, E., Lestari, U., Listyorini, D., & Maslikah, S. I. (2016). Rencana Pembelajaran Semester Bioteknologi. Jususan Biologi, Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, Universitas Negeri Malang.
Aziz, A. N., Tegegne, F., & Wiemers, R. W. (2009). Benefits of Hands-On Biotechnology Training Workshops for Secondary School Educators and College Students. Journal of Biotech Research, 1, 72–79.
Bahri, N. M., Suryawati, E., & Osman, K. (2014). Students’ Biotechnology Literacy: The Pillars of STEM Education in Malaysia. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 10(3), 195–207.
Beheshti, M., Taspolat, A., Kaya, O. S., & Sapanca, H. F. (2018). Characteristics of Instructional Videos. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues, 10(1), 61–69.
Borgerding, L. A., Sadler, T. D., & Koroly, M. J. (2013). Teachers ’ Concerns About Biotechnology Education. Journal Science Education Technology, 22, 133–147.
Brew, A. (2010). Imperatives and Challenges in Integrating Teaching and Research. Higher Education Research and Development, 29(2), 139–150.
Brownell, S. E., Kloser, M. J., Fukami, T., & Shavelson, R. (2012). Undergraduate Biology Lab Courses: Comparing the Impact of Traditionally Based “Cookbook”and Autentic Research-Based Courses on Student Lab Experiences. Journal of College Science Teaching, 41(4), 36–45.
Burton, J. K., & Merril, P. F. (1991). Needs Assessment: Goals, Needs and Priorities. In L. J. Briggs, K. L. Gustafson, & M. H. Tillman (Eds.), Instructional Design: Principles and Applications. Educational Technology Publications (2nd ed., pp. 17–43). Englewood Cliffs.
Chen, S. Y., Chu, Y. R., Lin, C. Y., & Chiang, T. Y. (2016). Students’ Knowledge of, and Attitudes Towards Biotechnology Revisited, 1995-2014: Changes in Agriculture Biotechnology but not in Medical Biotechnology. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 44(5), 475–491.
Clark, D. D., & Edwards, D. J. (2018). Computer Software Virtual Protein Purification : A Simple Exercise to Introduce pH as a Parameter that Effects Ion Exchange Chromatography. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 46(1), 91–97.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Constructing 21st-Century Teacher Education. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(3), 300–314.
Darling-hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective Teacher Professional Development (Issue June).
Dash, S., Kamath, U., Rao, G., Prakash, J., & Mishra, S. (2016). Audio-Visual Aid in Teaching “Fatty Liver.” Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 44(3), 241–245.
Diwakar, S., Achuthan, K., Nedungadi, P., & Nair, B. (2011). Enhanced Facilitation of Biotechnology Education in Developing Nations via Virtual Labs : Analysis , Implementation and. International Journal of Computer Theory and Engineering, 3(1), 1–8.
Ehara, M., Ishibashi, M., Ichinose, Y., Iwanaga, M., Shimotori, S., & Naito, T. (1987). Purification and Characterization of Fimbriae from Fimbriate Vibrio cholerae O1 Strain Bgd17. Vaccine, 5, 283–288.
Fadzil, H. M., & Saat, R. M. (2020). Exploring Secondary School Biology Teachers’ Competency in Practical Work. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 9(1), 116–123.
Fauzi, A., & Fariantika, A. (2018). Courses Perceived Difficult by Undergraduate Students Majoring in Biology. Biosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 11(2), 78–89.
Gagne, R. M., Briggs, L. J., & Wager, W. W. (1992). Pinciples of Instructional Design (4th ed.). Harcourt Brace College Publishers.
Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2003). Educational Research: An Introduction (Seventh). Pearson Education, Inc.
Geng, F., & Alani, F. (2015). Biotechnology Labs Reinvented through Experiential Learning: Enhancing Student Outcomes through the “Flipped Lab.” Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA) Conference.
Gerven, N. Van, Waksman, G., & Remaut, H. (2011). Pili and Flagella: Biology, Structure, and Biotechnological Applications. In Progress in Molecular Biology and Translational Science (Vol. 103).
Gezer, S. U. (2015). A Case Study on Preservice Science Teachers’ Laboratory Usage Self Efficacy and Scientific Process Skills. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 1158–1165.
Gu, J., & Belland, B. R. (2015). Preparing Students with 21st Century Skills : Integrating Scientific Knowledge , Skills , and Epistemic Beliefs in Middle School Science Curricula. In G. X, I. D, & S. J. (Eds.), Emerging Technologies for STEAM Education, Educational Communications and Technology: Issues and Innovations (pp. 39–60). Springer.
Halimah, M., Rahmat, A., & Redjeki, S. (2020). Biotechnology Learning Profile Biology in FKIP Biology Education Study Program Pasundan University Bandung Indonesia. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 151 042031.
Hanegan, N. L., & Bigler, A. (2009). Infusing Authentic Inquiry into Biotechnology. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18, 393–401.
Hayat, M. ., & Rustaman, N. . (2017). How is the Inquiry Skills of Biology Preservice Teachers in Biotechnology Lecture ? Journal of Physics: IOP Conf. Series, 895 012135.
Kereluik, K., Mishra, P., Fahnoe, C., & Terry, L. (2013). What Knowledge Is of Most Worth: Teacher Knowledge for 21st Century Learning. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 29(4), 127–140.
Ketpichainarong, W., Panijpan, B., & Ruenwongsa, P. (2010). Enhanced Learning of Biotechnology Students by an Inquiry-Based Cellulase Laboratory. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 5(2), 169–187.
Kidman, G. (2010). What is an ‘Interesting Curriculum’ for Biotechnology Education? Students and Teachers Opposing Views. Research in Science Education, 40, 353–373.
Kırbaşlar, F. G., & Barış, Ç. Ç. (2016). The Investigation of Pre-service Science Teachers’ Opinions on Some of the Biology and Biotechnology Concepts. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 6(1), 9–16.
Klop, T., Severiens, S. E., Knippels, M.-C. P. J., van Mil, M. H. W., & Dam, G. T. M. Ten. (2010). Module on Attitudes towards Modern Biotechnology of Secondary School Students. International Journal of Science Education, 32(9), 1127–1150.
Knutson, K., Smith, J., Wallert, M. A., & Provost, J. J. (2010). Bringing the Excitement and Motivation of Research to Students ; Using Inquiry and Research-Based Learning in a Year-Long Biochemistry Laboratory. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 38(5), 317–323.
Lee, W. W., & Owens, D. L. (2004). Multimedia-Based Instructional Design (Second). Pfeiffer.
Leedy, P. D., & Ormrod, J. E. (2015). Practical Research: Planning and Design (Eleventh). Pearson.
Li, W., Lee, A., & Solmon, M. (2007). The Role of Perceptions of Task Difficulty in Relation to Self-Perceptions of Ability, Intrinsic Value, Attainment Value, and Performance. European Physical Education Review, 13(3), 301–318.
Makransky, G., Thisgaard, M. W., & Gadegaard, H. (2016). Virtual Simulations as Preparation for Lab Exercises : Assessing Learning of Key Laboratory Skills in Microbiology and Improvement of Essential Non-Cognitive Skills. PLoS ONE, 11(6), e0155895.
Mayer, R. E. (2014). Introduction to Multimedia Learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to Reduce Cognitive Load in Multimedia Learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 43–52.
Movahedzadeh, F., Patwell, R., Rieker, J. E., & Gonzalez, T. (2012). Project-Based Learning to Promote Effective Learning in Biotechnology Courses. Education Research International, 2012, 1–8.
Narulita, E., Hariyadi, S., Utomo, A. P., & Fauziah, L. F. (2019). Research-Based Biotechnology Book with Virtual Laboratory for Elevating TPACK of Biology Pre-Service Teacher. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 18(11), 297–310.
Niwangtika, W. (2017). Pengembangan Multimedia Interaktif Virtual Laboratory Teknik DNA Barcoding sebagai Media Pembelajaran Rekayasa Genetika. Universitas Negeri Malang.
Orhan, T. Y., & Sahin, N. (2018). The Impact of Innovative Teaching Approaches on Biotechnology Knowledge and Laboratory Experiences of Science Teachers. Education Sciences, 8(4), 213.
Oto, M., Ono, M., & Kamada, H. (2006). Gene Literacy Education in Japan — Fostering Public Understanding through Practice of Hands-on Laboratory Activities in High Schools. Plant Biotechnology, 23, 339–346.
Pavlasova, L., Janstova, V., & Lindner, M. (2017). Skills Of Pre-Service Biology Teachers to Solve an Inquiry-Based Task. In M. Rusek & K. Vojíř (Eds.), Project-Based Education In Science Education: Empirical Texts (pp. 74–82). Department of Chemistry and Chemistry Education, Faculty of Education, Charles University.
Qalbina, P., & Ahda, Y. (2019). Characteristics of Biotechnology Learning Materials Generally Used by Biology Education Students in Padang City. Journal of Physics: Conf. Series, 1185 012154.
Radhamani, R., Divakar, A., Nair, A. A., Sivadas, A., Mohan, G., Nizar, N., Nair, B., Achuthan, K., & Diwakar, S. (2018). Virtual Laboratories in Biotechnology are Significant Educational Informatics Tools. International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics (ICACCI), 1547–1551.
Rochintaniawati, D., Riandi, R., Kestianty, J., Kindy, N., & Rukayadi, Y. (2019). The Analysis of Biology Teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge Development in Lesson Study in West Java Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 8(2), 201–210.
Rosenberg, J. M., & Koehler, M. J. (2015). Context and Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK): A Systematic Review. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 47(3), 186–210.
Sasidharakurup, H., Radhamani, R., Kumar, D., Nizar, N., Achuthan, K., Nair, B., & Diwakar, S. (2015). Using Virtual Laboratories as Interactive Textbooks : Studies on Blended Learning in Biotechnology Classrooms. EAI Endorsed Transactions on E-Learning, 15, e4.
Shegog, R., Lazarus, M. M., Murray, N. G., Diamond, P. M., Sessions, N., & Zsigmond, E. (2012). Virtual Transgenics: Using a Molecular Biology Simulation to Impact Student Academic Achievement and Attitudes. Research in Science Education, 42(5), 875–890.
Sikumbang, D., Rakhmawati, I., & Suwandi, T. (2019). Investigating the Cognitive Structure of Biology Preservice Teacher about Central Dogma of Molecular Biology Through Word Association Test. IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series, 1155 012047.
Steele, F., & Aubusson, P. (2004). The Challenge in Teaching Biotechnology. Research in Science Education, 34, 365–387.
Subekti, H., Susilo, H., Ibrohim, I., Suwono, H., & Purnomo, A. R. (2019). Exploration of Balai Materia Medica Batu: Field-Trip Supporting Biotechnology Learning. Exploration of Balai Materia Medica Batu: Field-Trip Supporting Biotechnology Learning, 95, 188–191.
Sukri, A., & Purwanti, E. (2016). Hubungan Persepsi dan Tingkat Keaktifan dengan Hasil Belajar Mahasiswa Biologi pada Perkuliahan Bioteknologi di Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang. Jurnal Edukasi Matematika dan Sains, 2(1), 1–6.
Sumarno, R. P., Avanita, A. S., Winarsih, S., Hidayat, S., & Nurhidayati, D. Y. (2015). Haemaglutination of Shigella Dysenteriae Subunit Pili Protein with Anti-Haemaglutination of S. dysenteriae Subunit Pili Protein as a Molecule Adhesion in Mouse Enterocytes. African Journal of Microbiology Research, 9(11), 781–787.
Suryanti, E., Fitriani, A., Redjeki, S., & Riandi, R. (2018). Identification of Conceptual Understanding in Biotechnology Learning. IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 335 012093.
Thieman, W., & Palladino, M. (2013). Introduction to Biotechnology (3rd ed.). Pearson.
Tibell, L. A. E., & Rundgren, C. (2010). Educational Challenges of Molecular Life Science: Characteristics and Implications for Education and Research. 9, 25–33.
Tien, L. T., & Osman, K. (2014). Development of Interactive Multimedia Module with Pedagogical Agent ( IMMPA ) in the Learning of Electrochemistry: Needs Assessment. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 7(18), 3725–3732.
Wilson, E., & Flowers, J. (2002). Secondary Educators ’ Confidence in Teaching Agricultural Biotechnology after Training. Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education, 31, 131–135.
Yarden, H., & Yarden, A. (2011). Studying Biotechnological Methods Using Animations: The Teacher’s Role. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20(6), 689–702.
Yasin, R. M., Amin, L., & Hin, K. K. (2018). Teaching & Learning of 21st Century Biotechnology in Secondary School Additional Science. Teaching Science, 64(3), 43–52.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v6i5.14782
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Saparuddin Saparuddin, Umie Lestari, Endang Suarsini
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan Journal of Education: Theory, Research, and Development Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang
|
