Formative Assessment in An Online Class of Language Learning: Literature Review

Hernik Farisia

Abstract


Abstract: Such published research provided the concept of formative assessment but the current practices of assessment for language learning digital based were weak. Therefore, this study intended to analyse and synthesize the results of relevant literature from any previous research to build a conceptual framework of using formative assessment and feedback in the digital age to promote a greater impact on reading achievement at elementary school. The literature selection was carried out using Publish or Perish (PoP) and screened by Convence.org program to records the eligible’ literature. A total of 8 articles were included in the analyses. The analyses of the text revealed that technology plays a role in enhancing communication and feedback among teachers, students, and peers, even though parents. In an online class of language learning, teachers could conduct an assessment interactively with various learning activities and such various digital-based instruments. It provided teachers current information about students’ reading development through dynamic formative feedback cycles including teaching, assessing, and adjusting diverse instruction to meet students’ need in learning.

Abstrak: Penelitian yang dipublikasikan tersebut memberikan konsep penilaian formatif tetapi praktik penilaian saat ini untuk pembelajaran bahasa berbasis digital masih lemah. Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini dimaksudkan untuk menganalisis dan mensintesis hasil literatur yang relevan dari penelitian sebelumnya untuk membangun kerangka konseptual menggunakan penilaian formatif dan umpan balik di era digital untuk mempromosikan dampak yang lebih besar pada prestasi membaca di sekolah dasar. Seleksi literatur dilakukan dengan menggunakan Publish or Perish (PoP) dan disaring oleh program Convence.org untuk mencatat literatur yang memenuhi syarat. Sebanyak 8 artikel dimasukkan dalam analisis. Analisis teks mengungkapkan bahwa teknologi berperan dalam meningkatkan komunikasi dan umpan balik antara guru, siswa, dan teman sebaya, bahkan orang tua. Dalam pembelajaran bahasa kelas online, guru dapat melakukan penilaian secara interaktif dengan berbagai kegiatan pembelajaran dan berbagai instrumen berbasis digital tersebut. Ini memberikan informasi terkini kepada guru tentang perkembangan membaca siswa melalui siklus umpan balik formatif yang dinamis termasuk mengajar, menilai, dan menyesuaikan instruksi yang beragam untuk memenuhi kebutuhan siswa dalam belajar.


Keywords


formative assessment; reading skills; e-learning; penilaian formatif; kemampuan membaca; pembelajaran elektronik

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anindya, F. Y., Sri, S., & Purnamasari, V. (2019). Analisis Gerakan Literasi Sekolah Pada Pembelajaran Tematik. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar, 3(2), 238–245.

Antoniou, P., & James, M. (2014). Exploring Formative Assessment in Primary School Classrooms: Developing a Framework of Actions and Strategies. Education Assessment and Evaluation, 26, 153–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-013-9188-4

Bailey, A. L., & Heritage, M. (2008). Formative Assessment for Literacy, Grades K-6: Building Reading and Academic . Corwin Press.

Bennett, R. E. (2011). Formative assessment: A critical review. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 18(1), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2010.513678

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5

Briggs, D. C., Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Furtak, E., Shepard, L., & Yin, Y. (2012). Meta-Analytic Methodology and Inferences About the Efficacy of Formative Assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 31(4), 13–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2012.00251.x

Brookhart, S. M. (2011). Educational Assessment Knowledge and Skills for Teachers. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 30(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2010.00195.x

Brown, D. (2004). Teaching By Principles. An InteractiveApproach to Language Pedagogy . Prentice Hall Regents Englewood Cliff.

Förster, N., Kawohl, E., & Souvignier, E. (2018). Short- and long-term effects of assessment-based differentiated reading instruction in general education on reading fluency and reading comprehension. Learning and Instruction, 56, 98–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.04.009

Hewi, L., Shaleh, M., & IAIN Kendari, P. (2020). Refleksi Hasil PISA (Hewi; Shaleh) Refleksi Hasil PISA (The Programme For International Student Assesment): Upaya Perbaikan Bertumpu Pada Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini). 04(1), 30–41.

Hudha, M. H., Hamidah, I., Permanasari, A., Abdullah, A. G., Rachman, I., & Matsumoto, T. (2020). European Journal of Educational Research Low Carbon Education: A Review and Bibliometric Analysis. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.1.319

Hughes, G. . (2010). Formative Assessment Practices that Mazimize Learning for Students at Risk (pp. 224–244). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203874851-19

Kacetl, J., & Semradova, I. (2020). Reflection on blended learning and e-learning – case study. Procedia Computer Science, 176, 1322–1327. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PROCS.2020.09.141

Macaruso, P., Wilkes, S., & Prescott, J. E. (2020). An Investigation of Blended Learning to Support Reading Instruction in Elementary Schools. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 2839–2852. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09785-2

Mahendra, E., Parmithi, & Hermawan, E. (2020). Teachers’ Formative Assessment: Accessing Students’ High Order Thinking Skills (HOTS). International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 12(12).

Mardiati, Y., Kunto, I., & Kustandi, C. (2021). A Learning Development Based on Social Learning Networks Microsoft Teams in Animation Courses. Jurnal Pembelajaran Inovatif, 4(1), 35–42. https://doi.org/10.21009/jpi.041.05

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook and The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Thousand Oaks.

Mubarok, H. (2020). Formative Assessment in Language Evaluation Class. Journal of English Language Teaching, 50(1), 15–19. https://doi.org/10.30998/scope.v5i1.6535

Murniati, E., Nainggolan, B., Panjaitan, H., Pandiangan, L. E., & Widyani, I. D. A. (2018). Writing Matrix and Assessing Literature Review: A Methodological Element of a Scientific Project . Journal of Asian Development, 4(2).

Pellerin, M. (2012). Digital Documentation: Using Digital Technologies to Promote Language Assessment for the 21st Century. Cahiers DE L’Ilob, 4, 19–36.

Poerwanti, J. I. S. (2012). Pengembangan Model Asesmen Autentik Mata Pelajaran Bahasa Indonesia di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Sekolah Dasar: Kajian Teori dan Praktik Pendidikan, 21(2), 152–158.

Putri, N. V. W., Munir, A., & Anam, S. (2021). Students’ Perceptions of Teacher Feedback in EFL English Class and Their Self-regulated Learning after Receiving Feedback. Journal on English as a Foreign Language, 11(1), 42–60. https://doi.org/10.23971/jefl.v11i1.2237

Rahmawati, F. P. (2015). MEnilik Keberadaan Bahasa (Sastra) Indonesia sebagai Penghela Ilmu Pengetahuan di Sekolah Dasar . Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia.

Ramdhani, A., Ramdhani, M. A., & Amin, A. S. (2014). Writing a Literature Review Research Paper: A Step-by-step Approach. International Journal of Basic and Applied Science, 3(1).

Solihin, L., Hijriani, I., Raziqiin, K., & Zaenuri, M. (2019). Indeks Aktivitas Literasi Membaca 34 Provinsi. Jakarta: Pusat Penelitian Kebijakan Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan, Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Stover, K., Yearta, L., & Harris, C. (2016). Formative Assessment in the Digital Age: Blogging with Third Graders. Reading Teacher, 69(4), 377–381. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1420

Sukreni, N. N., Nyoman Ganing, N., Putra, M., Pendidikan Guru, J., & Dasar, S. (2014). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Role Playing Berbasis Penilaian Kinerja terhadap Keterampilan Berbicara pada Pelajaran Bahasa Indonesia Siswa Kelas V SD. Jurnal Mimbar PGSD Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha , 2(1).

Tim Pusat Penilaian Pendidikan. (2019). Model Penilaian Formatif pada Pembelajaran abad 21 untuk Sekolah Dasar.

Van der Kleij, F. M., Adie, L. E., & Cumming, J. J. (2019). A meta-review of the student role in feedback. International Journal of Educational Research, 98, 303–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2019.09.005

Van der Kleij, F. M., Vermeulen, J. A., Schildkamp, K., & Eggen, T. J. H. M. (2015). Integrating data-based decision making, Assessment for Learning and diagnostic testing in formative assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 22(3), 324–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2014.999024

Vonderwell, S. K., & Boboc, M. (2013). Promoting Formative Assessment in Online Teaching and Learning. TechTrends 2013 57:4, 57(4), 22–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11528-013-0673-X

Westbroek, H. B., van Rens, L., van den Berg, E., & Janssen, F. (2020). A practical approach to assessment for learning and differentiated instruction. International Journal of Science Education, 42(6), 955–976. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1744044

Wiliam *, D., Lee, C., Harrison, C., & Black, P. (2004). Teachers developing assessment for learning: impact on student achievement. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 11(1), 49–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/¬0969¬594-042¬000208994

Wiliam, D. (2011). What is assessment for learning? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.03.001

Wright, D., Clark, J., & Tiplady, L. (2018). Designing for Formative Assessment: A Toolkit for Teachers (pp. 207–228). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73748-5_14

Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2017). Guidance on Conducting a Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1).




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v6i12.15169

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Hernik Farisia

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


JPtpp is accredited “Rank 3” as a scientific journal under the decree of the Directorate General of Research Enhancement and Development, Ministry of Research, Technology, and Higher Education, dated December 7, 2022, No: 225/E/KPT/2022, effective for five years from Volume 7 Issue 8, 2022 until Volume 12 Issue 7, 2027. Link to download


Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan

Journal of Education: Theory, Research, and Development

Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang

Lisensi Creative Commons

JPtpp is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License