Email this article 
Miskonsepsi yang disebabkan Misanalogi pada Siswa Field Independent dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematika
Abstract
Abstract: The purpose of this study is to identify the causes of misconceptions in creativity produced by students who have a field independent learning style in solving math problems related to digit and numbers. This research is a descriptive qualitative case study. The research subject consisted of one student who experienced a different phenomenon than other students. The subject gave the most creative answer compared to other students but the subject made a conceptual error. This is contrary to the results of previous studies regarding errors made by field independent students. The results showed that there were misconceptions in understanding numbers and numbers on the subject. The subject made an error in defining and analogizing between numbers and numbers. The causes of misconceptions on the subject are (1) Analogy errors in constructing existing concept, (2) Submission of information from the teacher, and (3) Inappropriate sources of free reading.
Abstrak: Tujuan penelitian ini adalah mengidentifikasi penyebab terjadinya miskonsepsi pada kreativitas yang dihasilkan oleh siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar field independent dalam menyelesaikan masalah matematika yang berkaitan dengan bilangan. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kualitatif deskriptif dengan metode studi kasus. Subjek penelitian terdiri dari satu siswa yang mengalami fenomena berbeda dibanding siswa lainnya. Subjek memberikan jawaban paling kreatif dibanding siswa lainnya tetapi subjek tidak memahami sepenuhnya konsep bilangan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan terdapat miskonsepsi dalam pemahaman bilangan pada subjek. Subjek melakukan kesalahan dalam mendefinisikan dan menganalogikan antara digit dan bilangan. Penyebab terjadinya miskonsepsi pada subjek yaitu (1) kesalahan analogi dalam mengonstruksi konsep yang ada, (2) penyampaian informasi dari pengajar, dan (3) sumber bacaan bebas yang kurang tepat.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Aldahmash, A. H., & Alshaya, F. S. (2012). Secondary School Students’ Alternative Conceptions about Genetics. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 16(1), 1–14.
Altun, A., & Cakan, M. (2006). Undergraduate Students’ Academic Achievement, Field Dependent/Independent Cognitive Styles And Attitude Toward Computers. Educational Technology and Society, 9(1), 289–297.
Chick, H. L., & Baker, M. (2005). Investigating Teachers’Responses To Student Misconceptions. Psychology of Mathematics Education, 2(1), 249–256.
Durkin, K., & Rittle-Johnson, B. (2015). Diagnosing Misconceptions: Revealing Changing Decimal Fraction Knowledge. Learning and Instruction, 37(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.08.003
Fatmahanik, U. (2018). Penelusuran Miskonsepsi Operasi Bilangan Bulat dalam Pembelajaran Matematika Pada Mahasiswa PGMI dengan Menggunakan CRI (Certainty of Respon Index). Cendekia: Jurnal Kependidikan Dan Kemasyarakatan, 16(1), 167–187. https://doi.org/10.21154/cendekia.v16i1.1201
Gradini, E. (2016). Miskonsepsi Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika Sekolah Dasar di Dataran Tinggi Gayo. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 3(2), 52–60.
Green, M., Flowers, C., & Piel, J. A. (2010). Reversing education majors’ arithmetic misconceptions with short-term instruction using manipulatives. The Journal of Educational Research, 101(4), 234–242. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.101.4.234-242
Köse, S. (2008). Diagnosing Student Misconceptions: Using Drawings as A Research Method. World Applied Sciences Journal, 3(2), 283–293. http://idosi.org/wasj/wasj3(2)/20.pdf
Lei, W., Deng, W., Zhu, R., Runco, M. A., Dai, D. Y., & Hu, W. (2021). Does Cognitive Style Moderate Expected Evaluation and Adolescents’ Creative Performance: An Empirical Study. Journal of Creative Behavior, 55(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.439
Lin, Y. C., Yang, D. C., & Li, M. N. (2016). Diagnosing Students’ Misconceptions In Number Sense Via A Web-Based Two-Tier Test. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(1), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1420a
Pang, W. A., & Dindyal, J. (2009). Analogical Reasoning Errors in Mathematics at Junior College Level. Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, 1(1), 1–9.
Rahmawati, U., Sudirman, & Sisworo. (2018). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa Field Independent dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Aritmatika Sosial dengan Model Skema Fong beserta Scaffoldingnya. Jurnal Pendidikan, 3(8), 1100–1109.
Raisa, M. (2020). Riana.pdf. In Analisis Kesalahan Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Sistem Persamaan Linear Dua Variabel Ditinjau Dari Gaya Kognitif Siswa Kelas VIII MTS Al-Anshor Ambon (pp. 1–64).
Saputri, I., Susanti, E., & Aisyah, N. (2017). Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis Siswa menggunakan Pendekatan Metaphorical Thinking pada Materi Perbandingan Kelas VIII di SMPN 1 Indralaya Utara. Jurnal Elemen, 3(1), 15–24.
Sariningsih, R., & Purwasih, R. (2017). Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Dan Self Efficacy Mahasiswa Calon Guru. JNPM (Jurnal Nasional Pendidikan Matematika), 1(1), 163–177. https://doi.org/10.33603/jnpm.v1i1.275
Suprihatin, T. R., Maya, R., & Senjayawati, E. (2018). Proses Koneksi Matematis Siswa Bergaya Kognitif Reflektif Dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Aljabar Berdasarkan Taksonomi Solo. Jurnal Kajian Pembelajaran Matematika, 2(1), 53–63. http://journal2.um.ac.id/index.php/jkpm
Thompson, F., & Logue, S. (2006). An Exploration Of Common Student Misconceptions in Science. International Education Journal, 7(4), 553–559.
Ulfah, S., & Fitriyani, H. (2016). Certainty of Response Index (CRI): Miskonsepsi Siswa SMP pada Materi Pecahan. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan, Sains dan Teknologi, 1(1), 341–349.
Unal, D. O., & Urun, O. (2021). Sixth Grade Students’ Some Difficulties and Misconceptions on Angle Concept. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 27(1), 125–154. https://doi.org/10.14689/enad.27.7
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v7i9.15671
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 Ika Ujiana S Sugianto, Abdur Rahman As’ari, Sukoriyanto Sukoriyanto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan Journal of Education: Theory, Research, and Development Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang
|
