PENGEMBANGAN MODUL PEMBELAJARAN INKUIRI BERBASIS LABORATORIUM VIRTUAL

Chandra Adi Prabowo, Ibrohim Ibrohim, Murni Saptasari

Abstract


The purpose of this research is to develop a virtual laboratory based inquiry instructional module. This module was built following the systematic instructional design process including the steps of analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation (ADDIE). The feasibility of the instructional module as a product of the development process refers to expert appraisal and student response as a testing subject. The result of the research showed that virtual laboratory based inquiry instructional module was meet the feasibility standard of instructional material consist of validity, practically, and effectiveness.

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengembangkan modul pembelajaran biologi berbasis pendekatan pembelajaran inkuiri yang dilengkapi dengan media simulasi interaktif berupa laboratorium virtual. Modul dikembangkan mengacu pada model penelitian dan pengembangan ADDIE yang meliputi lima tahapan, yaitu analysis, design, development, implementation, dan evaluation. Kelayakan modul hasil pengembangan mengacu pada hasil penilaian ahli, praktisi lapangan, dan respon siswa sebagai subjek uji coba. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan modul yang dikembangkan telah memenuhi standar aspek kelayakan yang meliputi validitas, kepraktisan, dan keefektifan bahan ajar.


Keywords


instructional module; inquiry; virtual laboratory; modul pembelajaran; inkuiri; laboratorium virtual

Full Text:

PDF

References


Akker, J. J. H. van den, Branch, R., Gustafson, K., Nieveen, N.M. & Plomp, T. 1999. Design approaches and tools in education and training. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Amri, S. K. 2010. Konstruksi Pengembangan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka.

Azwar, S. 2014. Metode Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Bulger, Sean. M., Mohr, Derek. J., Walls, Richard. T. 2002. Stack the Deck in Favor of Your Students by Using the Four Aces of Effective Teaching. Journal of Effective Teaching, 5(2). http://uncw.edu/cte/et/articles/bulger/ (Online), diakses 9 Juni 2016.

Depdiknas. 2006. Pedoman Memilih dan Menyusun Bahan Ajar. Jakarta.

Depdiknas. 2008. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Pusat Bahasa.

Dikmenjur. 2008. Teknik Penyusunan Modul. Jakarta: Direktorat Pembinaan Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan.

Drost, E. A. 2011. Validity and Reliability in Social Science Research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1): 105—123.

Galvin, Aine., & O’Neill. 2013. Guidelines for Good Practice in Designing a Blended Module in Blackboard. http://www.ucd.ie/t4cms/UCDTLE0061.pdf (Online), diakses pada 7 Juni 2016

Hausfather, S. 2001. Where’s the Content? The Role of Content in Constructivist Teacher Education. Educational Horizons, 80 (1), 15—19

Holden, Jolly. T., Westfall, Philip. J. An Instructional Media Selection Guide for Distance Learning. NY:USA: United States Distance Learning Association.

Huppert, J., Lornask, S. M., & Lazarowitz, R. 2002. Computer Simulation in The High School: Students Cognitive Stages, Science Process Skills and Academic Achievement in Microbiology. International Journal of Science Education, 24(8), 803-821.

Jablon, J. R., & Wilkinson, Michael. 2006. Using Engagement Strategies to Facilitate Children’s Learning and Success. Young Children on the Web. https://www.naeyc.org/files/yc/file/200603/JablonBTJ.pdf (Online), diakses 9 Juni 2016.

Kubieck, J. P. 2005. Inquiry-based learning, the nature of science, and computer technology: New possibilities in science education. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology. 31(1), (Online), (http://cjlt.csj.ualberta.ca/index.php/cjlt/article/view/149/142), diakses 14 Juni 2016.

Kurniawati, I. 2012. Modul Pelatihan Pengembangan Bahan Ajar. Jakarta: Pusat Teknologi Informasi & Komunikasi Pendidikan Kemdikbud

Llewellyn, D. 2013. Teaching High School Science Through Inquiry and Argumentation Second Edition. California: Corwin.

Mulyasa, E. 2006. Kurikulum Berbasis Kompetensi. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Nieveen, N., McKenney, S., & Akker, J. van den. 2006. Educational design research: The value of variety. Dalam J. van den Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney, and N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational design research (pp. 151—158). London: Routledge.

Onasanya, S. A. 2004. Selection and Utilization of Instructional Media For Effective Practice Teaching. Institute Journal of Studies in Education, 2(1), 127—133

Ong, S. K., & Mannan, M. A. 2004. Virtual reality simulations and animations in a web-based interactive manufacturing engineering module. Computers & Education, 43(4), 361—382.

Pashler, Harold., Bain, Patrice. M., Bottge, Brian. M., 2007. Organizing Instruction and Study to Improve Student Learning. http://ncer.ed.gov/ (online). diakses 7 Juni 2016

PEI Department of Education. 2008. Evaluation and Selection of Learning Resources. Charlottetown: Prince Edward Island

Permendikbud Nomor 64 Tahun 2013 tentang standar isi kurikulum 2013

Permendikbud nomor 104 tahun 2013 tentang Pembelajaran pada Pendidikan Dasar dan Pendidikan Menengah.

Ravichandran, T., Sravanakumar, A. R. 2013. Enhancing Biological Sciences Laboratory Experimental Skills Through Virtual Laboratory Techniques. Indian Journal of Research. 2 (4), 70—72.

Retnowati, T. H. 2006. Penyusunan Materi Pembelajaran Mata Pelajaran Seni Rupa Berdasar Kurikulum Berbasis Kompetensi Sekolah Menengah Pertama. Makalah disampaikan pada Workshop Pelaksanaan Kurikulum Berbasis Kompetensi Bagi Guru Kesenian Sekolah Menengah Pertama. Yogyakarta: UNY

Remziye, Yeter, Sevgül, Zehra, & Meral. 2011. The effects of inquiry-based science teaching on elementary school students’ science process skills and science attitudes. Bulgarian Journal of Science and Education Policy (BJSEP), 5, 1.

Scardamalia, M. 2002. Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. In B. Smith, Liberal education in a knowledge society (pp. 67—98). Chicago, IL: Open Court.

Sproken-Smith, R. 2007. Experiencing the process of knowledge creation: The nature and use of inquiry-based learning in higher education. (online). (http:// akoaotearoa.ac.nz/sites/default/files/u14/Review.pdf) diakses pada 14 Juni 2016.

Sudjana, N. 1990. Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya

Trilling, Bernie., Fadel, Charles,. 2009. 21st Century Skills. San Francisco: John Willey & Sons, Inc.

Wahono, R. S. 2006. Artikel: Aspek dan Kriteria Penilaian Media Pembelajaran. (http://romisatriawahono.net/2006/06/21/aspek-dan-kriteria-penilaianmedia-pembelajaran/), diakses 3 Januari 2016.

Walls, R.T. 1999. Psychological foundations of learning. Morgantown, WV: WVU International Center for Disability Information

Williamson, David. M., Bejar, Isaac. I., & Sax, Anne,. 2004. Automated Tools for Subject Matter Expert Evaluation of Automated Scoring. Princeton: ETS




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jp.v1i6.6422

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2016 Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan




JPtpp is accredited “Rank 3” as a scientific journal under the decree of the Directorate General of Research Enhancement and Development, Ministry of Research, Technology, and Higher Education, dated December 7, 2022, No: 225/E/KPT/2022, effective for five years from Volume 7 Issue 8, 2022 until Volume 12 Issue 7, 2027. Link to download


Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan

Journal of Education: Theory, Research, and Development

Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang

Lisensi Creative Commons

JPtpp is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License