MISKONSEPSI SISWA PADA MATERI LARUTAN BUFFER

Widy Ika Parastuti, Suharti Suharti, Suhadi Ibnu

Abstract


Buffer solution is one high school chemistry material found misconceptions on student understanding. Misconceptions identification method by giving some quetion with same type. Misconceptions identified from recurring student answers incorrectly. The study population was the students of class XI IPA at SMAN 1 Malang academic year 2015/2016 with a research subject in class XI MIA 7 number of 32 students. The results obtained by analysis of four kinds of misconceptions. The cause of the misconception is (1) a weak prior knowledge; (2) problems of symbols and mathematical formulas; (3) difficulty understanding the context of the material; (4) problems in generalize.

Larutan buffer merupakan salah satu materi kimia SMA yang ditemukan miskonsepsi pada pemahaman siswa. Metode identifikasi miskonsepsi dengan memberikan beberapa soal yang setipe. Miskonsepsi teridentifikasi dari jawaban salah yang berulang siswa. Populasi penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas XI IPA SMA Negeri 1 Malang Tahun ajaran 2015/2016 dengan subjek penelitian kelas XI MIA 7 sejumlah 32 siswa. Hasil analisis diperoleh  empat macam miskonsepsi. Penyebab miskonsepsi adalah (1) pengetahuan awal yang lemah; (2) permasalahan simbol dan rumus matematika; (3) kesulitan memahami konteks materi; (4) permasalahan dalam menggeneralisasikan masalah.


Keywords


misconceptions; buffer solution; miskonsepsi; larutan buffer

Full Text:

PDF

References


Berg. V.D. 1991. Miskonsepsi Fisika dan Remediasi. Salatiga: UKSW.

Dahar, R.W. 1988. Teori-teori Belajar. Bandung: P2LPTK.

Dhindsa, H.S. & Treagust, D.F. 2009. Conceptual Understanding of Bruneian Tertary Student: Chemical bonding and Structure. Brunei Int. J. Of. Sci & Math. Edu, 1 (1):33—51.

Effendy. 2012. A Level Chemistry for Senior High School Student Vol. 2B. Malang: Bayupedia.

Hailikari, T., Katajavuori, N. & Lindblom-Ylanne, S. 2008. The Relevance of Prior Knowledge in Learning and Instructional Design. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 72 (5):1—8.

Hailikari, T. 2009. Assesing University Students's Prior Knowledge: Implication for Theory and Practice. Research Report 227. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.

Janiuk, R.M. The Process of Learning Chemistry: A Review of The Studies. Journal of Chemical Education, 70 (10):828—829.

Kean E. &Meddlecamp, C. 1985. Panduan Belajar Kimia Dasar. Jakarta: Gramedia.

Khodaryah, N. 2010. Analisis Kesalahan Konsep tentang Larutan Buffer pada Siswa Kelas XI SMAN 2 dan SMA YPK Bontang serta Upaya untuk Memperbaikinya dengan Menggunakan Strategi Konflik Kognitif. Tesis tidak diterbitkan. Malang: Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Malang.

Lin, Y.C., Lin, Y.T. & Huang, Y.M. 2011. Development of A Diagnostic System Using A Testing-Based Approach for Strengthening Student Prior Knowledge. Computers & Education. 57:1557—1570.

Nakhleh, M.B. 1992. Why Some Students Don't Learn Chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 69 (3):191—196.

McMurry, J.E. & Fay, R. C. 2012. Chemistry. 6th Edition . United States of America: Pearson Prentice Hall.

Muchtar, Z. & Harizal. 2012. Analyzing of Students'Misconseption on Acid-Base Chemistry at Senior High School in Medan. Journal of Education and Practice. 3 (15):65—74.

Orgill, M. & Sutherland, A. 2008. Undergraduate Chemistry Students’ Perceptions of and Misconceptions about Buffers and Buffer Problems. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, (9):131—143.

Pabucçu, A. & Geban, O. 2006. Remediating Misconceptions Concerning Chemical Bonding Through Conceptual Change Text. H.U. Journal of Education, 30:184—192.

Sesen, B.A. & Tarhan, L. 2011. Active-learning Versus Teacher Centered Instruction for Learning Acids and Bases. Research in Science & Technological Education. 29 (2):205—226.

Sirhan, G. 2007. Learning Difficulties in Chemistry: An Overview. Journal of Turkish Science Education. 4 (2):2—20.

Thompson, R.A. & Zamboanga, B.L. 2004. Academic Aptitude and Prior Knowledge as Predictors of Student Achievement in Introduction to Psychology. Journal of Educational Psychology. 96 (4):778—784.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jp.v1i12.8272

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan




JPtpp is accredited “Rank 3” as a scientific journal under the decree of the Directorate General of Research Enhancement and Development, Ministry of Research, Technology, and Higher Education, dated December 7, 2022, No: 225/E/KPT/2022, effective for five years from Volume 7 Issue 8, 2022 until Volume 12 Issue 7, 2027. Link to download


Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan

Journal of Education: Theory, Research, and Development

Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang

Lisensi Creative Commons

JPtpp is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License