PENGARUH GUIDED INQUIRY-BLENDED LEARNING TERHADAP LITERASI SAINS MAHASISWA BIOLOGI

Widi Cahya Adi, Hadi Suwono, Endang Suarsini

Abstract


Scientific literacy is important to be prepared for the younger generation to solve problems in life. Guided inquiry (GI) is strategy that can be used to improve scientific literacy. Blended learning can be integrated in GI (GI-BL), to improve the effectiveness of learning. The purpose of this study is to analyze the effect of GI-BL to improve scientific literacy of biology students when compared with Structured Inquiry (SI). The results show that GI-BL and SI-BL have significant influence in increasing the scientific literacy compared to SI. GI-BL is more effective in improving validate literature skill, designing scientific research, and fundamental statistic capabilities.

Literasi sains penting untuk dipersiapkan bagi generasi muda agar dapat memecahkan permasalahan dalam kehidupan. Guided inquiry (GI) merupakan strategi yang dapat digunakan untuk meningkatkan literasi sains. Blended learning dapat diintegrasikan pada GI (GI-BL) untuk meningkatkan keefektifan pembelajaran. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah menganalisis pengaruh GI-BL terhadap literasi sains mahasiswa biologi jika dibandingkan dengan strategi Structured Inquiry (SI) Hasil menunjukkan GI-BL dan SI-BL memiliki pengaruh yang signifikan dalam meningkatkan literasi sains jika dibandingkan SI. GI-BL lebih efektif dalam meningkatkan kemampuan memvalidasi literatur, mendesain penelitian ilmiah, dan kemampuan dasar statistik.


Keywords


guided inquiry; blended learning; scientific literacy; guided inquiry; blended learning; literasi sains

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adolphus., T., & Arokoyu, A. A. 2012. Improving Scientific Literacy among Secondary School Students through Integration of Information and Communication Technology. ARPN Journal of Science and Technology, 2 (5):444—448.

Akyol, Z., Garrison, D. R., & Ozden, M. Y. 2009. Development of a Community of Inquiry in Online and Blended Learning Contexts. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1 (1):1834—1838.

Ambarsari, W., Santosa, S., & Maridi. 2013. Penerapan Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing terhadap Keterampilan Proses Sains Dasar pada Pelajaran Biologi Siswa Kelas VIII SMP Negeri 7 Surakarta. Pendidikan Biologi, 5 (1):81—95.

Amien, M. 1987. Mengajarkan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam (IPA) dengan Menggunakan Metode Discovery dan Inquiry. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Banchi, H., & Bell, R. 2008. The Many Levels of Inquiry. Science and Childreen: 28—29.

Banerjee, A. 2010. Teaching Science Using Guided Inquiry as the Central Theme: A Professional Development Model for High School Science Teachers. Fall, 19 (2):1—9.

Bell, R. L., Smetana, L., & Bins, L. 2005. Simplifying Inquiry Instruction. The Science Teacher. (Online) (http://www.nsta.org/highschool, diakses 9 April 2017).

Cohen, J. 1992. A Power Primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112 (1):155—159.

Diana, S. 2015. Penerapan Strategi Peer Assisted Learning (PAL) untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Literasi Sains Mahasiswa dalam Perkuliahan Fisiologi Tumbuhan. Laporan Penelitian Tidak Dipublikasi. Bandung: Departemen Pendidikan Biologi UPI.

Gormally, C., Brickman, P., Hallar, B., & Armstrong, N. 2009. Effects of Inquiry-based Learning on Students’ Science Literacy Skills and Confidence. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 3 (2):1—22.

Gucluer, E., & Kesercioglu, T. 2012. The Effect of Using Activities Improving Scientific Literacy on Students’ Achievement in Science and Technology Lesson. International Online Journal of Primary Education, 1 (1):8—13.

Haryono. 2010. Pemanfaatan Internet sebagai Alternatif Sumber Belajar dan Media Pendidikan Jarak Jauh. (Online) (http://www.kompasiana.com/hariyono21/pemanfaatan-internet-sebagai-alternatif-sumber-belajar-dan-media-pendidikan-jarak-jauh_55003ff4a33311c271510187, diakses 18 Juni 2016).

Kuhlthau, dkk. 2010. Guided Inquiry: School Libraries in The 21st Century. Makalah disampaikan dalam International Association of School Librarians Conference, Padua Italia, 2 September 2009.

Kuhlthau, C. C. 2007. Guided Inquiry: Learning in the 21st Century. USA: Center for International Scholarship in School Libraries (CISSL).

Lee, W. J., Puspitasari, K. A., Kim, H. Y., & Jeong, A. 2010. The Effects of Guided Inquiry Questions on Students’ Critical Thinking Skills and Satisfaction in Online Argumentation. (Online) (http://myweb.fsu.edu/ajeong/papers/Lee2010Inquiry Questions Argumentation.pdf, diakses 1 September 2016).

Llewellyn, D. 2011. Teaching High School Science Through Inquiry and Argumentation. USA: A SAGE Company.

National Research Council. 1996. National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

NCREL dan Meitri Group. 2003. enGauge 21st Century Skills: Literacy in the Digital Age. (Online) (http://www.ncrel.org/ engauge.org/engauge), diakses pada tanggal 28 Agustus 2016.

Mahardika, E. A. S., Suwono, H., & Indriwati, S. E. 2016. Eksplorasi Kemampuan Awal Literasi Biologi Siswa Kelas X SMAN 7 Malang. Makalah disampaikan dalam Seminar Nasional Pendidikan dan Saintek, Surakarta, 21 Mei 2016.

Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development. 2006. Assessing Scientific, Reading, and Mathematical Literacy: A Framework for PISA 2006. Paris: OECD Publication.

Osman, K., Hiong L. C., & Vebrianto, R. 2012. 21st Century Biology: An Interdisciplinary Approach of Biology, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics Education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 102:188—194.

Rifqiyati. 2013. Analisis Literasi dan Kemampuan Melakukan Mini Riset mahasiswa Biologi Universitas pendidikan Indonesia. Tesis tidak diterbitkan. Bandung: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Romero, M. 2015. Work, Games and Lifelong Learning in the 21st Century. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174:115—121.

Salamon, E. 2007. Scientific Literacy in Higher Education. University of Calgary: Commissioned by the Tamaratt Teaching Professorship.

Sen, S., Yılmaz, A., dan Geban, O. 2015. The Effects of Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning Environment on Students’ Self-Regulated Learning Skills. Problems of Education in The 21st Century, 66: 54—66.

Seraphin, K. D., Philippoff, J., Kaupp, L., & Vallin, L. M. 2012. Metacognition as Means to Increase the Effectiveness of Inquiry-Based Science Education. Science Education International, 23 (4):366—382.

Smithenry, D.W. 2010. Integrating Guided Inquiry into a Traditional Chemistry Curricular Framework. International Journal of Science Education, 32 (13):1689—1714.

Sulistiwati. 2015. Analysis Understanding of Science Literacy Students Who Took Integrated IPA Course Using Sample Problem PISA 2009. Sainteks, 7 (1):21—40.

Tan, K. C. D., & Kim, M. 2012. Issues and Challenges in Science Education Research. New York: Springer Dordrecht Heidelberg New York London.

Tangkas, I. M. 2012. Pengaruh Implementasi Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing terhadap Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep dan Keterampilan Proses Sains Siswa Kelas X SMAN 3 Amlapura. Tesis tidak diterbitkan. Bali: Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha.

The Association of College and Research Libraries. 2000. Information Literacy Competency Satndars for Higher Education. Chicago: American Library Association.

The Partnership for the 21st Century Skills. 2015. Framework for 21st Century Learning. (Online), (http://www.p21.org/about-us/p21-framework, diakses 28 Agustus 2016).

Trna, J., Trnova, E., & Sibor, J. 2012. Implementation of Inquiry-Based Science Education in Science Teacher Training. Journal of Educational and Intructional Studies in the World, 1(4):199—209.

Trowbridge, L.W., & Bybee, R.W. 1990. Becoming a Secondary School Science Teacher. Melbourne: Merill Publishing Company.

Turiman, P., Omar J., Daud, A. M., & Osma, K. 2012. Fostering the 21st Century Skills through Scientific Literacy and Science Process Skills. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59: 110—116.

United Nations Environment Programme. 2012. 21 Issues for the 21st Century: Result of the UNEP Foresight Process on Emerging Environmental Issues. Nairobi, Kenya: United Nations Environment Programme.

Vaughan, N. 2014. Student Engagement and Blended Learning: Making the Assessment Connection. Education Sciences, 4 (4): 247—264.

Vinu, P. V., Sherimon, P. C., & Krishnan, R. 2011. Towards Pervasive Mobile Learning-The Vision of 21st Century. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15:3067—3073.

Wallace C. S., & Kang H. N. 2004. An Investigation of Experienced Secondary Science Teacher’s Beliefs About Inquiry: An Examination of Competing Belief Sets. Journal of Research and Science Teaching, 41: 936—960.

Weisler, S., Bellin, R., Lee, S., & Stillings, N. 2001. An Inquiry-based Approach to E-learning: The CHAT Digital Learning Environment. USA: National Science Foundation for "Inquiry-Based Learning: Cognitive Measures and Systems Support.

Zion, M., & Mendelovici, R. 2012. Moving from Structured to Open Inquiry: Challenges and Limits. Science Education International, 23 (4):388—399.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v2i10.10084

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Widi Cahya Adi, Hadi Suwono, Endang Suarsini

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

JPtpp is accredited “Rank 3” as a scientific journal under the decree of the Directorate General of Research Enhancement and Development, Ministry of Research, Technology, and Higher Education, dated December 7, 2022, No: 225/E/KPT/2022, effective for five years from Volume 7 Issue 8, 2022 until Volume 12 Issue 7, 2027. Link to download

Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan

Journal of Education: Theory, Research, and Development

Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang

Lisensi Creative Commons

JPtpp is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License