Email this article 
Eksplorasi Penggunaan Link Map dalam Learning Cycle 7E untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Siswa pada Materi Fluida Statis
Abstract
Abstract: The aim of this research is to explore the influence using link map in learning cycle 7e on the student’s problem solving skill in static fluid. The kind of this research is qualitative research with case study approach. The techniques of collecting data are link map created by students and posttest result of student’s problem solving skill. The instruments that used in this research are link map in LKS and five problem solving question with reliability value 0,691. Sample in this research are 5 students from class XI IA 1 SMAN Kediri. The result of data analysis shows that students with ability to create link map correctly get better score than the other students. This shows that link map can help to understand and link the relevant concepts in static fluid and useful as a reference in problem solving.
Abstrak: Penelitian ini dimaksudkan untuk mengeskplor pengaruh penggunaan link map dalam Learning Cycle 7E terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah siswa pada materi fluida statis. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian kualitatif dengan pendekatan studi kasus. Teknik pengumpulan data berupa link map yang dibuat siswa dan hasil kemampuan pemecahan masalah siswa melalui posttest. Instrumen penelitian yang digunakan adalah link map dalam LKS dan lima soal kemampuan pemecahan masalah dengan reliabilitas soal sebesar 0,691. Sampel pada penelitian ini adalah lima siswa dari kelas XI IA 1 SMAN 3 Kediri. Hasil analisis data menunjukkan siswa yang mampu membuat link map dengan tepat memperoleh nilai kemampuan pemecahan masalah yang lebih baik daripada siswa yang tidak mampu membuat link map. Hal ini menunjukkan bahwa link map membantu siswa memahami dan mengaitkan konsep-konsep yang relevan pada materi fluida statis dan berguna sebagai alat referensi dalam pemecahan masalah.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Arend, R. I. (2012). Learning to Teach, Ninth Edition. America, New York: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. Book (Vol. 2nd ed). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aenj.2008.02.005.
Ding, L., Reay, N., Lee, A., & Bao, L. (2011). Exploring the role of conceptual scaffolding in solving synthesis problems. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.7.020109.
Docktor, J. L., Dornfeld, J., Frodermann, E., Heller, K., Hsu, L., Jackson, K. A., … Yang, J. (2016). Assessing student written problem solutions: A problem-solving rubric with application to introductory physics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.010130.
Eisenkraft, A. (2003). Expanding The 5E Model. The Science Teacher-Washington-, 70(6), 56–59. Retrieved from http://www.its-about-time.com/iat/5e.pdf.
Hung, W., & Jonassen, D. H. (2006). Conceptual Understanding of Causal Reasoning in Physics. International Journal of Science Education, 28(13), 1601–1621. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600560902.
Ibrahim, B., Ding, L., Heckler, A. F., White, D. R., & Badeau, R. (2017). Students’ Conceptual Performance on Synthesis Physics Problems with Varying Mathematical Complexity. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.010133.
Leak, A. E., Rothwell, S. L., Olivera, J., Zwickl, B., Vosburg, J., & Martin, K. N. (2017). Examining Problem Solving in Physics-Intensive Ph.D. Research. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.020101.
Lin, S. Y., & Singh, C. (2015). Effect of Scaffolding on Helping Introductory Physics Students Solve Quantitative Problems Involving Strong Alternative Conceptions. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.11.020105.
Lindstrøm, C., & Sharma, M. D. (2009). Link Maps and Map Meetings: Scaffolding Student Learning. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.5.010102.
Lindstrøm, C., & Sharma, M. D. (2011). Teaching physics novices at university: A case for stronger scaffolding. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.7.010109.
Loverude, M. E., Heron, P. R. L., & Kautz, C. H. (2010). Identifying and addressing student difficulties with hydrostatic pressure Exploring student difficulties with pressure in a fluid Identifying and addressing student difficulties with hydrostatic pressure. American Journal of Physics AIP Conf. Proc. Am. J. Phys, 78(517), 75–1412. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.3192767͔.
Moreira, J. A., Almeida, A., & Carvalho, P. S. (2013). Two Experimental Approaches of Looking at Buoyancy. The Physics Teacher, 51(2), 96–97. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.4775530.
Mulyono, & Noor, N. L. (2017). Self-Regulation and Problem Solving Ability in 7E-Learning Cycle Based Goal Orientation. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 824). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/824/1/012035.
Ozkan, G., & Selcuk, G. S. (2016). Facilitating Conceptual Change in Students’ Understanding of Concepts Related to Pressure. European Journal of Physics, 37(5). https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/37/5/055702.
Walsh, L. N., Howard, R. G., & Bowe, B. (2007). Phenomenographic Study of Students’ Problem Solving Approaches in Physics. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.020108.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v3i5.10991
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2018 Dian Rafiah, Parno Parno, Ahmad Taufiq
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan Journal of Education: Theory, Research, and Development Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang
|
