Perubahan Model Mental Siswa pada Materi Alat Optik melalui Experiential Learning

Novi Arianti, Lia Yuliati, Sunaryono Sunaryono

Abstract


Abstract: The central goal of this research was to characterize the mental models of optical instruments expressed by students. The subject of this study were 35 students of class XI in SMA Negeri 1 Badegan. Mixed method embedded experimental model was conducted to probe the participant’s model mental. Data obtained through interviews and tests. The results reveal that the participants held five categories of mental models of optical instrument. The development of student’s model mental indicated by nearly half held a scientifically compatible model mental during and after studying Physics with Experiential Learning.

Abstrak: Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui model mental siswa SMA pada materi alat optik. Subjek penelitian adalah 35 siswa kelas XI SMA Negeri 1 Badegan. Penelitian menggunakan metode Mixed method embedded experimental model. Data diperoleh melalui tes dan wawancara. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan terdapat lima kategori model mental. Perubahan model mental siswa ditunjukkan dengan hampir setengah siswa di dalam kelas memiliki model mental yang sesuai dengan saintifik selama dan setelah pembelajaran Experiential Learning dilakukan.

Keywords


mental models; optical devices; experiential learning; refraction; reflection; model mental; alat optik; experiential learning; pembiasan; pemantulan

Full Text:

PDF

References


Amalia, R., Sari, I. M., & Sinaga, P. (2017). Students’ Mental Model on Heat Convection Concept and its Relation with Students Conception on Heat and Temperature. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 812 (1). doi:10.1088/1742-6596/812/1/012092.

Chiou, G. L. (2013). Reappraising the Relationships Between Physics Students’ Mental Models and Predictions: An Example of Heat Convection. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 9 (1). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.9.010119.

Corpuz, E. D., & Rebello, N. S. (2011). Investigating Students’ Mental Models and Knowledge Construction of Microscopic Friction. I. Implications for Curriculum Design and Development. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 7(2). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.7.020102.

Didiş, N., EryIlmaz, A., & Erkoç, Ş. (2014). Investigating Students’ Mental Models about the Quantization of Light, Energy, and Angular Momentum. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 10 (2). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.10.020127.

Fyttas, G., Komis, V., & Ravanis, K. (2013). Ninth Grade Students’ Mental Representations of the Refraction of Light : Didactic Implications, 59 (December), 133–139.

Gentner, D. (2002). Psychology of Mental Models. In International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences (Vol. 8, pp. 9683–9687).

Harrison, A. G., & Treagust, D. F. (1996). Secondary Students’ Mental Models of Atoms and Molecules: Implications for Teaching Chemistry. Science Education, 80 (5), 509–534. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199609)80:5<509::AID-SCE2>3.0.CO;2-F.

Hrepic, Z., Zollman, D. A., & Rebello, N. S. (2010). Identifying Students’ Mental Models of Sound Propagation: The Role of Conceptual Blending in Understanding Conceptual Change. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 6(2). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.6.020114.

Hubber, P. (2006). Year 12 Students’ Mental Models of the Nature of Light. Research in Science Education, 36(4), 419–439.

Ifenthaler, D. (2010). Relational, Structural, and Semantic Analysis of Graphical Representations and Concept Maps.

Educational Technology Research and Development, 58 (1), 81–97. DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-008-9087-4.

Itza-Ortiz, S. F., Rebello, S., & Zollman, D. (2004). Students’ Models of Newton’s Second Law In Mechanics and Electromagnetism. European Journal of Physics, 25 (1), 81–89. https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/25/1/011.

Jansoon, N., Coll, R. K., & Somsook, E. (2009). Understanding Mental Models of Dilution in Thai Students. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 4 (2), 147–168.

Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental Models: Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference, and Consciousness. Cognitive Science.

Jonassen, D., & Cho, Y. H. (2008). Externalizing Mental Models with Mindtools. In Understanding Models for Learning and Instruction (pp. 145–159).

Kaewkhong, K., Mazzolini, A., Emarat, N., & Arayathanitku l, K. (2010). Thai High-School Students’ Misconceptions about and Models of Light Refraction Through a Planar Surface. Physics Education, 45 (1), 97–107. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/45/1/012.

Liu, Z., & Stasko, J. (2010). Mental Models, Visual Reasoning, and Interaction in Information Visualization: A Top-Down Perspective. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 16 (6), 999–1008.

Marx, R. W., Blumenfeld, P. C., Krajcik, J. S., Fishman, B., Soloway, E., Geier, R., & Tal, R. T. (2004). Inquiry-based science in the middle grades: Assessment of Learning in Urban Systemic Reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 1063–1080. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20039.

McClary, L., & Talanquer, V. (2011). College Chemistry Students’ Mental Models of Acids and Acid Strength. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(4), 396–413. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20407.

McNeil, S. (2014). Visualizing Mental Models: Understanding Cognitive Change to Support Teaching and Learning of

Multimedia Design and Development. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63 (1), 73–96.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-014-9354-5.

Nersessian, N. J. (2007). Mental Modeling in Conceptual Change Nancy J. Nersessian College of Computing Georgia Institute of Technology, 1–78.

Norman, D. A. (1983). Some Observations on Mental Models. In Mental Models. (7), 7–14. https://doi.org/Cited By (since 1996) 346rExport Date 12 September 2012.

Özcan, Ö. (2015). Investigating Students’ Mental Models about the Nature of Light in Different Contexts. European Journal of Physics, 36(6). doi:10.1088/0143-0807/36/6/065042.

Singer, J., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J., & Chambers, J. C. (2000). Constructing extended inquiry projects: Curriculum Materials for Science Education Reform. Educational Psychologist, 35 (3), 165–178.

Tarciso Borges, A., & Gilbert, J. K. (1999). Mental Models of Electricity. International Journal of Science Education, 21 (1), 95–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006999290859.

Tural, G. (2015). Active Learning Environment with Lenses in Geometric Optics. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 16 (1).

Tzeng, J. Y., & Schwen, T. M. (2003). Mental Representation-Based Task Analysis for Analyzing Value-Laden Performance. Educational Technology Research and Development.

van der Veen, J. (2017). Draw Your Physics Homework?: Art as a Path to Understanding and Assessment in Undergraduate science education. In Drawing for Science Education: An International Perspective (pp. 11–29).

Yehezkel, C., Ben-Ari, M., & Dreyfus, T. (2005). Computer Architecture and Mental Models. In Proceedings of the 36th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education - SIGCSE ’05 (p. 101).




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v3i5.11085

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Novi Arianti, Lia Yuliati, Sunaryono Sunaryono

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


JPtpp is accredited “Rank 2” as a scientific journal under the decree of the Directorate General of Research Enhancement and Development, Ministry of Research, Technology, and Higher Education, dated October 24, 2018, No: 30/E/KPT/2018, effective for five years from Volume 3 Issue 1, 2018 until Volume 7 Issue 8, 2022.


Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan

Journal Of Education

Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang

Lisensi Creative Commons

JPtpp is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License