Email this article 
Penguasaan Konsep pada Hukum Archimedes Siswa SMA
Abstract
Abstract: The purpose of this study was to describe students’ concept mastery on Archimedes’ principle. The method of this study was descriptive method. The instrument of concept mastery test of this study was consisted of 4 essay questions with reliability Cronbach’s alpha 0.67. This study was the study case in one of class in SMAN 8 Muaro Jambi. The subjects of this study were 27 students. The result shows that the average of students’ concept mastery is 33,00 with scale 0 to 100. It was low category. The students found difficulties to be applied the concept of Archimedes principle toward a problem. Moreover, the students found difficulties to be intrepreted a problem with figure so the students found difficult to be related to Archimedes principle.
Abstrak: Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mendeskripsikan penguasaan konsep siswa pada submateri Hukum Archimedes. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode deskriptif. Instrumen tes penguasaan konsep penelitian ini terdiri atas empat soal esai dengan reliabilitas Cronbach’s alpha 0.67. Penelitian ini merupakan study kasus di salah satu kelas di SMAN 8 Muaro Jambi. Subjek penelitian terdiri atas 27 siswa. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa penguasaan konsep siswa pada submateri hukum Archimedes memiliki rata-rata 33,00 dengan skala 0—100, hasil tersebut tergolong rendah. Siswa mengalami kesulitan dalam menerapkan konsep hukum Archimedes terhadap permasalahan yang diberikan. Siswa mengalami kesulitan dalam menginterpretasikan permasalahan berupa gambar sehingga siswa mengalami kesulitan untuk mengaitkan dengan hukum Archimedes.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abraham, M. R., Williamson, V. M., & Westbrook, S. L. (1994). A Cross-Age Study of the Understanding of Five Chemistry Concepts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(2), 147–165. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660310206.
Aini, N. N., Kusairi, S., & Diantoro, M. (2017). Penguasaan Konsep Fluida Statis dengan Penilaian Formatif, (2012), 1377–1387.
Anderson, L. W. (Ed.), Krathwohl, D. R. (Ed.), Airasian, P.W., Cruikshank, K.A., Mayer, R.E., Pintrich, P.R., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M. C. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives (Com- plete edition). New York: Longman.
Arends, R.I. 2012. Learning to Teach. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc.
Azizah, R., Yuliati, L., & Latifah, E. (2015). Kesulitan Pemecahan Masalah Fisika pada Siswa SMA. Jurnal Penelitian Fisika dan Aplikasinya (JPFA), 5 (2), 44–50. Diperoleh dari http://journal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/jpfa.
Datur, Irmina S., Yuliati, L., Mufti, N. (2016). Eksplorasi Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Siswa Fisika pada Materi Fluida Statis (pp. 294–300). Malang: Prosiding Seminar Nasional IPA Pascasarjana UM.
Ipek, H., Kala, N., Yaman, F., & Ayas, A. (2010). Using POE Strategy to Investigate Student Teachers’ Understanding about the Effect of Substance Type on solubility. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 648–653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.078.
Jannah, A. N., & Yuliati, L. (2016). Melalui Pembelajaran Inquiry Lesson dengan Strategi Lbq, 409–420.
Loverude, M. E., Heron, P. R. L., & Kautz, C. H. (2010). Identifying and Addressing Student Difficulties with Hydrostatic Pressure. American Journal of Physics, 78(2010), 75. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.3192767.
Najah, F. N., Linuwih, S., & Susanto, H. (2015). Komparasi Pemahaman Konsep Siswa SMP tentang Hukum Archimedes Antara Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning (Pbl) dan Team Assisted Individualization (TAI) Pendekatan Saintifik. Unnes Physic Education Journal, 4(2), 56–61.
Ningrum, F. S., & Linuwih, S. (2015). Analisis Pemahaman Siswa SMA terhadap Fluida pada Hukum Archimedes. Unnes Physics Education Journal, 4(1), 33-36.
Pratiwi, E. D. (2013). Alat Peraga Hukum Archimedes untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep Siswa. Tesis tidak diterbitkan. Universitas Negeri Semarang. Semarang.
Suparno, P. (2013). Miskonsepsi Perubahan Konsep dalam Pendidikan Fisika. Jakarta: Grasindo.
Unal, S., COSTU, Bayram. 2005. Problematic Issue for Student : Doses it sink or float ?. Asia-Pacific on Science Learning and Teaching, (Online) 3 (1).
Wagner, D. J., Carbone, E., & Lindow, A. (2013). Exploring Student Difficulties with Buoyancy, (5), 357–360. https://doi.org/10.1119/perc.2013.pr.077.
Widodo, L., Yuliati, L., & Parno. (2017). Eksplorasi Penguasaan Konsep Awal Siswa pada Materi Fluida Statis, 2, 206–211.
Yadaeni, Ahmad., Kusairi, Sentot., & P. (2016). Studi Kesulitan Siswa dalam Menguasaai Konsep Fluida Statis (Vol. 1, pp. 59–63). Prosiding Semnas Pendidikan IPA Pascasarjana UM.
Yarden, A., Falk, H., Federico-Agraso, M., Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P., Norris, S. P., & Phillips, L. M. (2009). Supporting Teaching and Learning Using Authentic Scientific Texts: A Rejoinder to Danielle J. Ford. Research in Science Education, 39(3), 391–395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-008-9116-7.
Yusrizal. (2016). Analysis of Difficulty Level of Physics National. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 5(1), 140–149. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v5i1.5803.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v3i6.11138
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2018 Lestari Widodo, Lia Yuliati, Parno Parno
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan Journal of Education: Theory, Research, and Development Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang
|
