Email this article 
Deskripsi Kesalahan Siswa pada Penyelesaian Masalah Sistem Persamaan Linear Tiga Variabel (SPLTV)
Abstract
Abstract: The aim of this research is to describe the students’ errors in solving system of equations in three variable problems based on Newman’s Error Analysis. Research subject is students grade X Madrasah Aliyah Al Irtiqo’ who make errors in solving SPLTV problems. The method of this research is test and interviews. The result of this research showed that there are six types of error made by students when solving SPLTV problems. Such errors are reading error, comprehenssion error, transformation error, process skill error, encoding error, and carelless error. The most common error found in this study were transformation, process skill, and encoding.
Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan kesalahan siswa dalam menyelesaikan masalah sistem persamaan linear tiga variabel (SPLTV) berdasarkan Newman’s Error Analysis. Subjek penelitian adalah siswa kelas X Madrasah Aliyah Al Irtiqo’ yang melakukan kesalahan saat menyelesaikan masalah SPLTV yang diberikan. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah tes dan wawancara. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat enam jenis kesalahan yang dilakukan siswa saat menyelesaikan masalah SPLTV. Kesalahan tersebut adalah kesalahan membaca masalah, memahami masalah, mentransformasi masalah, keterampilan proses, menuliskan jawaban akhir, dan kesalahan karena kecerobohan. Kesalahan terbanyak yang ditemukan pada penelitian ini adalah kesalahan mentransformasi masalah, keterampilan proses, dan menuliskan jawaban akhir.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abdullah, A. H., Abidin, N. L. Z., & Ali, M. (2015). Analysis of Students’ Errors in Solving Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Problems for the Topic of Fraction. Asian Social Science, 11(21), 133–142. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v11n21p133.
Auzar. (2013). Hubungan Kemampuan Membaca Pemahaman dengan Kemampuan Memahami Bahasa Soal Hitungan Cerita Matematika Murid-Murid Kelas 5 SD 006 Pekanbaru. Jurnal Bahasa, 8(1), 33–38.
Bell, F. H. (1981). Teaching and Learning Mathematics (Ilustrated). Dubuque Lowo: W. C. Brown Company Publisher.
Borasi, R. (1987). Exploring Mathematics through the Analysis of Errors *. For THe Learning of Mathematics, 3, 2–8.
Branca, N. A. (1980). Problem Solving as a Goal, Process and Basic Skill. In Problem Solving in School Mathematics: 1980 Yearbook. (S. Krulik & R. E. Reys, Eds.), The School Review (Vol. 77). Reston Virginia: NCTM. https://doi.org/10.1086/442876.
Brown, J., & Skow, K. (2016). Mathematics : with Instructor’s Guide Table of Contents and Mathematics: Identifying and Addressing Student Errors, 33.
Buchanan, T. (2007). The Importance of Teaching Students How to Read to Comprehend Mathematical Language. Lincoln: Departement of Mathematics University of Neraca.
Cahya, A. (2006). Pemahaman dan Penyajian Konsep Matematika Secara Benar dan Menarik. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.
Ellerton, N. F., & Clements, M. A. (1996). Newman Error Analysis. A Comparative Study Involving Year 7 Students in Malaysia and Australia. Technology and Mathematics Education, 186–193.
Herholdt, R., & Sapire, I. (2014). An Error Analysis in the Early Grades Mathematics – A Learning Opportunity? Background: Teachers Learning from Child Assessment in National Tests. South African Journal Od Childhood Education, 4(1), 42–60.
Miles, M. B., & Hubberman, A. M. (2014). Analisis Data Kualitatif: Buku Sumber tentang Metode-Metode Baru. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia Press.
Muhsetyo, G. (2007). Pembelajaran Matematika SD. Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka.
Muksar, M. (2009). Peningkatan Kemampuan Bahasa Inggris dan Hasil Belajar Matematika Dasar 1 Mahasiswa Bilingual melalui Penerapan Metode Analisis Kesalahan Newmann. Malang: FMIPA Universitas Negeri Malang.
Newman, M. A. (1997). An Analysis of Sixth-Grade Pupil’s Errors on Written Athematical Task. Victorian Institute of Educational Research Bulletin, 39, 31–43.
Prakitipong, N., & Nakamura, S. (2006). Analysis of Mathematics Performance of Grade Five Students in Thailand Using Newman Procedure, 9(1), 111–122.
Sari, Y. M., & Valentino, E. (2016). An Analysis of Students Error In Solving PISA 2012 and Its Scaffolding. Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education, 1(2), 90–98.
Singh, P., Rahman, A. A., & Hoon, T. S. (2010). The Newman Procedure for Analyzing Primary Four Pupils Errors on Written Mathematical Tasks: A Malaysian Perspective. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 8(5), 264–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.036.
Sumarmo, U., Dedy, E., & Rahmat. (1994). Suatu Alternatif Pengajaran untuk Meningkatkan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Pada Guru dan Siswa SMA. Bandung: FMIPA IKIP Bandung.
White, A. L. (2005). Active Mathematics In Classrooms: Finding Out Why Children Make Mistakes - and Then Doing Something To Help Them. Square One, 15(4), 15–19.
White, A. L. (2010). Numeracy, Literacy, and Newman's Error Analysis. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in Southeast Asia, 33(2), 129–148.
Wu, M., & Adams, R. J. (2006). Modelling Mathematics Problem Solving Item Response Using a Multidimensional IRT Model. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 18(2), 93–113.
Zakaria, E., --, I., & Maat, S. M. (2010). Analysis of Students’ Error in Learning of Quadratic Equations. International Education Studies, 3(3), 105–110. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v3n3p105.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v3i7.11286
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2018 Yayuk Kuswanti, Sudirman Sudirman, Toto Nusantara
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan Journal of Education: Theory, Research, and Development Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang
|
