Miskonsepsi Konsep Gerak Satu dan Dua Dimensi Siswa SMA

Faizatun Nisa’, Lia Yuliati, Nandang Mufti

Abstract


Abstract: Aim of this study is to explore Senior High School student’s concepts understanding on one and two dimensional motion. This study is quantitave non-experiment using survey. The instrument was multiple choice test contains concepts understanding on one and two dimensional motion. Sample of this study are 113 students from grade XI and XII SMA Negeri in  Bojonegoro. Result shows, conceptual understanding of students on one and two dimensional motion is low and misconception are found.

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan mengeksplorasi penguasaan konsep gerak satu dan dua dimensi siswa SMA. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif non-eksperimen dengan metode survei. Instrumen pengukuran berupa soal tes penguasaan konsep berbentuk pilihan ganda. Tes diberikan pada 113 siswa yang terdiri dari kelas XI dan XII SMA di Bojonegoro. Hasil penelitian didapatkan penguasaan konsep gerak satu dan dua dimensi siswa rendah dan ditemukan kesalahan konsep.

Keywords


mastery of concepts; straight motion; parabolic motion; circular motion; penguasaan konsep; gerak lurus; gerak parabola; gerak melingkar

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adams, W. K., & Wieman, C. E. (2015). Analyzing The Many Skills Involved in Solving Complex Physics Problems. American Journal of Physics, 83(5), 459—467.

Afwa, I. L., Sutopo, S., & Latifah, E. (2016). Deep Learning Question untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep Fisika. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 1(3), 434—447.

Anderson, O. W. & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Longman.

Beichner, R. J. (1994). Testing Student Interpretation of Kinematics Graphs. American journal of Physics, 62(8), 750—762.

Bollen, L., De Cock, M., Zuza, K., Guisasola, J., & van Kampen, P. (2016). Generalizing a Categorization of Students’ Interpretations of Linear Kinematics Graphs. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(1), 010108.

Ceberio, M., Almudí, J. M., & Franco, Á. (2016). Design and Application of Interactive Simulations in Problem-Solving in University-Level Physics Education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(4), 590—609.

Dilber, R., Karaman, I., & Duzgun, B. (2009). High School Students' Understanding of Projectile Motion Concepts. Educational Research and Evaluation, 15(3), 203—222.

Docktor, J. L., & Mestre, J. P. (2014). Synthesis of Discipline-Based Education Research in Physics. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 10(2), 020119.

Docktor, J. L., Strand, N. E., Mestre, J. P., & Ross, B. H. (2015). Conceptual Problem Solving in High School Physics. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 11(2), 020106.

Elby, A. (2000). What Students' Learning of Representations Tells us about Constructivism. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 19(4), 481—502.

Engelhardt, P.V., & Beichner, R. J. (2004). Student’ Understanding of Direct Current Resistive Electrical Circuits. American Journal of Physics, 72(1), 98—115.

Hudha, M. N., Yuliati, L., & Sutopo, S. (2016). Perubahan Konseptual Fisika dengan Authentic Problem melalui Integrative Learning pada Topik Gerak Lurus pada SMA Suryabuana Malang. Jurnal Inspirasi Pendidikan, 6(1), 733—743.

Ivanjek, L., Susac, A., Planinic, M., Andrasevic, A., & Milin-Sipus, Z. (2016). Student Reasoning about Graphs in Different Contexts. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(1), 010106.

Jordan, C., Dunn, A., Armstrong, Z., & Adams, W. K. (2018). Projectile Motion Hoop Challenge. The Physics Teacher, 56(4), 200—202.

Kalman, C. S., Lattery, M., & Sobhanzadeh, M. (2018). Impact of Reflective Writing and Labatorials on Student Understanding of Force and Motion in Introductory Physics. Creative Education, 9(4), 575—596.

Knight, R. D. (2017). Physics For Scientists and Engineers Second Edition A Strategyc Approach. Pearson San Francisco.

McDermott, L. C., Rosenquist, M. L., & Van Zee, E. H. (1987). Student Difficulties in Connecting Graphs and Physics: Examples from Kinematics. American Journal of Physics, 55(6), 503—513.

Meltzer, D. E. (2011). Teacher Education in Physics: Research, Curriculum, and Practice. American Physical Society.

Millar, R., & Kragh, W. (1994). Alternative Frameworks or Context-Specific Reasoning?: Children's Ideas about the Motion of Projectiles. School Science Review, 75(272), 27—34.

Montecinos, A., Davis, S., & Peralta, J. (2018). Deterministic Physical Systems Under Uncertain Initial Conditions: The Case of Maximum Entropy Applied to Projectile Motion. European Journal of Physics.

Pawl, A. (2014). Is it Disadvantageous to Teach Forces First in Mechanics. American Association of Physics Teachers, 1119(10), 203—206.

Planinic, M., Ivanjek, L., Susac, A., & Milin-Sipus, Z. (2013). Comparison of University Students’ Understanding of Graphs in Different Contexts. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 9(2), 020103.

Reif, F., & Allen, S. (1992). Cognition for Interpreting Scientific Concepts: A Study of Acceleration. Cognition and Instruction, 9(1), 1—44.

Rosenblatt, R. & Heckler, A. F. (2011). Systematic Study of Student Understanding of the Relationships Between the Directions of Force, Velocity, and Acceleration in One Dimension. Phys. Rev. St Phys.Educ. Res., 7, 020112.

Saepuzaman, D., & Karim, S. (2016). Desain Pembelajaran Student’s Conceptual Construction Guider Berdasarkan Kesulitan Mahasiswa Calon Guru Fisika pada Konsep Gerak Parabola. Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 2(2), 79—86.

Serway, R. A., & Jewett, J. W. (2014). Physics for Scientist and Engineers with Modern Physics 9th Edition. United States of America: Thomson Higer Education.

Setyono, A., Nugroho, S. E., & Yulianti, I. (2016). Analisis Kesulitan Siswa dalam Memecahkan Masalah Fisika Berbentuk Grafik. UPEJ Unnes Physics Education Journal, 5(3), 32—39.

Sutarno, S., Setiawan, A., Kaniawati, I., & Suhandi, A. (2017). Pre-Service Physics Teachers’ Problem-Solving Skills in Projectile Motion Concept. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 895(1), 012105. IOP Publishing.

Sutopo, S. 2012. Pembelajaran Kinematika Berbasis Diagram Gerak: Cara Baru Dalam Pengajaran Kinematika. Seminar Nasional Penelitian Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, (June 2012), 11.

Sutopo, Liliasari, Waldrip, B., & Rusdiana, D. (2012). Impact of Representational Approach on The Improvement of Students’ Understanding of Acceleration. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 8(2), 161—173.

Taqwa, M. R. A., Hidayat, A., & Sutopo, S. (2017). Konsistensi Pemahaman Konsep Kecepatan dalam Berbagai Representasi. Jurnal Riset dan Kajian Pendidikan Fisika, 4(1), 31—39.

Wahyudi, I., & Maharta, N. 2013. Pemahaman Konsep dan Miskonsepsi Fisika pada Guru Fisika SMA RSBI di Bandar Lampung. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA Universitas Lampung, 14(1).

Wang, J., Guo, D., & Jou, M. (2015). A Study on the Effects of Model-Based Inquiry Pedagogy on Students’ Inquiry Skills in a Virtual Physics Lab. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 658—669.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v4i10.12874

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Faizatun Nisa’, Lia Yuliati, Nandang Mufti

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


JPtpp is accredited “Rank 2” as a scientific journal under the decree of the Directorate General of Research Enhancement and Development, Ministry of Research, Technology, and Higher Education, dated October 24, 2018, No: 30/E/KPT/2018, effective for five years from Volume 3 Issue 1, 2018 until Volume 7 Issue 8, 2022.


Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan

Journal Of Education

Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang

Lisensi Creative Commons

JPtpp is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License