Analisis Potensi Penyajian Prosedur Buku New Syllabus Mathematics Jilid II Dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis

Apriliana Tezha Eka Faradina, Abdur Rahman As’ari, Sukoriyanto Sukoriyanto

Abstract


Abstract: The main focus of this research is describing potential for presenting book procedures New Syllabus Mathematics volume II in graph of quadratic function in improving critical thinking skills. Critical thinking skills consists of interpretation, analysis, evaluation, and inference. This research used content analysis. The researcher have determined to analyze inverstigation and worked example. This research showed that the presentation of book procedures volume II have  the potential to improve interpretation ability and analysis with 100%.

Abstrak: Tujuan penelitian ini adalah mendeskripsikan potensi penyajian prosedur buku New Syllabus Mathematics jilid II materi grafik fungsi kuadrat dalam meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis. Kemampuan berpikir kritis terdiri dari interpretasi, analisis, evaluasi, dan inferensi. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan analisis isi. Peneliti memutuskan jenis penyajian prosedur yang dianalisis yaitu investigation dan worked example. Penelitian ini memberikan hasil bahwa penyajian prosedur buku NSM jilid II berpotensi dalam meningkatkan kemampuan interpretasi dan analisis dengan persentasi 100%.

Keywords


potential analysis; critical thinking; the new syllabus mathematics book; analisis potensi; berpikir kritis; buku new syllabus mathematics

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aizikovitsh-Udi, E., & Cheng, D. (2015). Developing Critical Thinking Skills from Dispositions to Abilities: Mathematics Education from Early Childhood to High School. Creative Education, 06(04), 455–462. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2015.64045

As’ari, A. R. (2016). Pengembangan 4C’s dalam Pembelajaran Matematika : Sebuah Tantangan Pengembangan Kurikulum matematika [Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika Pascasarjana]. Universitas Negeri Malang.

Aslan, C., & Polat, D. (2008). Content Analysis on Primary Education Turkish Course Books from the Point of Acquiring Critical Thinking Skills. Issues on Education and Research, 1, 147–160. The Athens Institute for Education and Research.

Atkinson, R. K., Derry, S. J., Renkl, A., & Wortham, D. (2015). Learning from Examples: Instructional Principles from the Worked Examples Research. Review of Education Research, 70(2), 181–214.

Carlgren, T. (2013). Communication, Critical Thinking, Problem Solving: A Suggested Course for All High School Students in the 21st Century. Interchange, 44(1–2), 63–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-013-9197-8

Denbel, D. G. (2015). Functions in the Secondary School Mathematics Curriculum. Journal of Educational and Practice, 6(1), 77–81.

Duron, R., Limbach, B., & Waugh, W. (2006). Critical Thinking Framework for any Discipline. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 17(2), 160–166.

Errington, A., & Bubna-Litic, D. (2015). Management by Textbook: The Role of Textbooks in Developing Critical Thinking. Journal of Management Education, 39(6), 774–800. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562915594839

Gardiner, A. D. (2014). Teaching Mathematics at Secondary Level. The De Morgan Gazette, 6(1), 1–215.

Glasnovic Gracin, D. (2018). Requirements in Mathematics Textbooks: A Five-Dimensional Analysis of Textbook Exercises and Examples. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 49(7), 1003–1024. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2018.1431849

Heong, Y. M., Othman, W. B., Yunos, J. B. M., Kiong, T. T., Hassan, R. B., & Mohamad, M. M. B. (2011). The Level of Marzano Higher Order Thinking Skills among Technical Education Students. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 1(2), 121–125.

Kaur, B. (2014). Mathematics Education In Singapore-An Insider’s Perspective. IndoMS-JME, 5(1), 1–16.

Ponte, J. (2007). Investigations and Explorations In The Mathematics Classroom. ZDM Mathematics Education, 39(5–6), 419 –430.

Seguin, R. (1989). The Elaboration of School Textbooks. UNESCO: Division of Educational Sciences, Contents and Methods of Education.

Tan, L. S., Koh, E., Lee, S. S., Ponnusamy, L. D., & Tan, K. C. K. (2017). The Complexities in Fostering Critical Thinking Through School-Based Curriculum Innovation: Research Evidence from Singapore. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 37(4), 517–534. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2017.1389694

Wu, M. (2009). A Critical Comparison of the Contents of PISA and TIMSS Mathematics Assessments. University of Melbourne, Australia.

Yang, D. C. (2017). A Comparison of Geometry Problems in Middle-Grade Mathematics Textbooks from Taiwan, Singapore, Finland, and the United States. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00721a




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v4i11.13026

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Apriliana Tezha Eka Faradina, Abdur Rahman As’ari, Sukoriyanto Sukoriyanto

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


JPtpp is accredited “Rank 2” as a scientific journal under the decree of the Directorate General of Research Enhancement and Development, Ministry of Research, Technology, and Higher Education, dated October 24, 2018, No: 30/E/KPT/2018, effective for five years from Volume 3 Issue 1, 2018 until Volume 7 Issue 8, 2022.


Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan

Journal Of Education

Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang

Lisensi Creative Commons

JPtpp is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License