Pengaruh Model Daur Belajar 5 Fase terhadap Keterampilan Proses Sains Siswa pada Materi Termokimia

Wulan Ratia Ratulangi, Endang Budiasih, Anugrah Ricky Wijaya

Abstract


Abstract: This study aims to determine the differences in the 5-Phase Learning Cycle model and the conventional learning model of students' science process skills on thermochemical materials. This type of research is quasi-experimental. Sampling using random sampling techniques and obtained two sample classes, namely Class XI MIPA 6B3 as an experimental class and XI MIPA 6C3 as a control class at SMAN 10 Malang in the academic year 2017/2018. Collecting data using the science process skill observation instrument sheet. The results showed that there were differences in science process skills between students who were taught with the 5 Phase Learning Cycle model and conventional learning models on thermochemical materials.Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perbedaan model Daur Belajar 5 Fase dan model pembelajaran konvensional terhadap keterampilan proses sains siswa pada materi termokimia. Jenis penelitian ini adalah eksperimen semu. Pengambilan sampel menggunakan teknik random sampling dan diperoleh dua kelas sampel, yaitu Kelas XI MIPA 6B3 sebagai kelas eksperimen dan XI MIPA 6C3 sebagai kelas kontrol di SMAN 10 Malang tahun ajaran 2017/2018. Pengumpulan data menggunakan instrumen lembar observasi keterampilan proses sains. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa ada perbedaan keterampilan proses sains antara siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan model Daur Belajar lima Fase dengan model pembelajaran konvensional pada materi termokimia.

Keywords


the 5 phase learning cycle model; science process skills; thermochemistry; model daur belajar 5 fase; keterampilan proses sains; termokimia

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abraham, M. R., & Renner, J. W. (1986). The Sequence of Learning Cycle Activities in High School Chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23(2), 121–143.

Agustyaningrum, N. (2011). Implementasi Model Pembelajaran Learning Cycle 5E untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa Kelas IX B SMP Negeri 2 Sleman. Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 377.

Aktamiş, H., & Ergin, Ö. (2008). The Effect of Scientific Process Skills Education on Students’ Scientific Creativity, Science Attitudes and Academic Achievements. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 9(1), 21.

Andani, M., & Utami, L. (2019). Pengaruh Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Learning Cycle 7E terhadap Keterampilan Proses Sains Siswa pada Materi Koloid di SMA Negeri 10 Pekanbaru. Journal of Natural Science and Integration, 2(1), 54–75.

Balci, S., Cakiroglu, J., & Tekkaya, C. (2006). Engagement, Exploration, Explanation, Extension, and Evaluation (5E) Learning Cycle and Conceptual Change Text as Learning Tools. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 34(3), 199–203.

Barker, V., & Millar, R. (2000). Students’ Reasoning about Basic Chemical Thermodynamics and Chemical Bonding: What Changes Occur During A Context-Based Post-16 Chemistry Course? International Journal of Science Education, 22(11), 1171–1200.

Bennett, J. M., & Sözbilir, M. (2007). A Study of Turkish Chemistry Undergraduates’ Understanding of Entropy. Journal of Chemical Education, 84(7), 1204.

Boo, H. K. (1998). Students’ Understandings of Chemical Bonds and the Energetics of Chemical Reactions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(5), 569–581.

Boo, H.-K., & Watson, J. R. (2001). Progression in High School Students’(Aged 16–18) Conceptualizations about Chemical Reactions in Solution. Science Education, 85(5), 568–585.

Brown, P. L., & Abell, S. K. (2007). Examining the Learning Cycle. Perspectives: Research and Tips to Suppport Science Education, 58–59.

Bybee, R. W. (2009). The BSCS 5E Instructional Model and 21st Century Skills. Colorado Springs, CO: BSCS. 24.

Bybee, R. W., Taylor, J. A., Gardner, A., Scotter, P. V., Powell, J. C., Westbrook, A., & Landes, N. (2006). The BSCS 5E Instructional Model: Origins, Effectiveness, and Applications. 19.

Chabalengula, V. M., Mumba, F., & Mbewe, S. (2012). How Pre-Service Teachers’ Understand and Perform Science Process Skills. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 8(3), 167–176.

Dahar, R. W. (2011). Teori-teori Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Dasna, I. W. (2006). Model Siklus Belajar (Learning Cycle) Kajian Teoritis dan Implementasinya dalam Pembelajaran Kimia, 69–98. Malang: UM.

Dimyati, M. (2006). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Djamarah, S. B., & Zain, A. (2006). Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Ergin, I. (2012). Constructivist Approach Based 5E Model and Usability Instructional Physics. Latin-American Journal of Physics Education, 6(1), 14–20.

Ergül, R. (2011). The Effects of Inquiry-Based Science Teaching on Elementary School Students’ Science Process Skills and Science Attitudes. Bulgarian Journal of Science and Education Policy (BJSEP), 5(1), 21.

Faradiba, I. (2012). Identifikasi Kesulitan Siswa dalam Memahami Konsep pada Materi Entalpi dan Perubahannya untuk Siswa Kelas XI SMA Negeri 1 Grati. Skripsi tidak diterbitkan. Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang.

Hanuscin, D. L., & Lee, M. H. (2008). Using the Learning Cycle as A Model for Teaching the Learning Cycle to Preservice Elementary Teachers. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 20(2), 51.

Hokkanen, S. L. (2011). Improving Student Achievement, Interest and Confidence in Science Through the Implementation of the 5E Learning Cycle in the Middle Grades of An Urban School. Montana State University.

Iskandar, S. M. (2011). Pendekatan Pembelajaran Sains Berbasis Konstruktivis. Malang: Bayumedia Publishing.

Kozma, R. B., & Russell, J. (1997). Multimedia and Understanding: Expert and Novice Responses to Different Representations of Chemical Phenomena. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(9), 949–968.

Maknun, D., Surtikanti, R. H. K., Munandar, A., & Subahar, S. (2012). Keterampilan Esensial dan Kompetensi Motorik Laboratorium Mahasiswa Calon Guru Biologi dalam Kegiatan Praktikum Ekologi. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 1(2), 141-148.

Marek, E. A. (2008). Why the Learning Cycle? Journal of Elementary Science Education, 20(3), 63.

Nisa, F. (2016). Identifikasi Kesulitan Siswa Kelas XI Kompetensi Keahlian Kimia Industri di SMK Gula Rajawali Madiun pada Materi Termokimia. Skripsi tidak diterbitkan. Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang.

Nugroho, F. (2012). Analisis Pemahaman Siswa Kelas XI IPA terhadap Materi Termokimia di SMAN 1 Glagah Kabupaten Banyuwangi. Skripsi tidak diterbitkan. Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang.

Nurbani, D., Gusrayani, D., & Jayadinata, A. K. (2016). Pengaruh Model Learning Cycle terhadap Keterampilan Proses Sains Siswa SD Kelas IV pada Materi Hubungan Antara Sifat Bahan dengan Kegunaannya. Jurnal Pena Ilmiah, 1(1), 211–220.

Ören, F., & Tezcan, R. (2009). The Effectiveness of the Learning Cycle Approach on Learners’ Attitude Toward Science in Seventh Grade Science Classes of Elementary School. Elementary Education Online, 8(1), 103–118.

Patrick, O. (2013). Which Way Do We Go in the Teaching of Biology? Concept Mapping, Cooperative Learning or Learning Cycle? International Journal of Science and Technology Education Research, 4(2), 18–29.

Qarareh, A. O. (2012). The Effect of Using the Learning Cycle Method in Teaching Science on the Educational Achievement of the Sixth Graders. International Journal of Educational Sciences, 4(2), 123–132.

Ria, L. S. (2016). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Guided Discovery untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Proses Sains Siswa pada Materi Kalor di Kelas X SMAN 1 Nganjuk. Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika, 5(2), 64–68.

Rustaman, N., Dirdjosoemarto, S., Yudianto, S. A., Achmad, Y., Subekti, R., Rochintaniawati, D., & Nurjhani, M. (2005). Strategi Belajar Mengajar Biologi. Malang: UM Press.

Sanjaya, W. (2006). Strategi Pembelajaran Berorientasi Standar Proses Pendidikan. Bandung: Kencana.

Sirhan, G. (2007). Learning Difficulties in Chemistry: An Overview. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 4(2), 2–20.

Slavin, R. E. (2008). Psikologi Pendidikan Teori dan Praktik Edisi Kedelapan. Jakarta: Indeks.

Sokrat, H., Tamani, S., Moutaabbid, M., & Radid, M. (2014). Difficulties of Students from the Faculty of Science with Regard to Understanding the Concepts of Chemical Thermodynamics. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 368–372.

Stojanovska, M. I., Soptrajanov, B. T., & Petrusevski, V. M. (2012). Addressing Misconceptions about the Particulate Nature of Matter Among Secondary-School and High-School Students in the Republic of Macedonia. Creative Education, 3(05), 619.

Suciati, S., Vincentrisia, A., & Ismiyatin, I. (2015). Application of Learning Cycle Model (5E) Learning with Chart Variation Toward Students’ Creativity. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 4(1), 56–66.

Sulistyowati, N., Suyatno, M. S., Poedjiastoeti, S. (2014). Pembelajaran Kimia dengan Model Learning Cycle 5E untuk Meningkatkan Penguasaan Konsep dan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa SMK pada Pokok Bahasan Termokimia. Jurnal Prosiding Seminar Nasional Kimia, 107–114.

Thomas, P. L., & Schwenz, R. W. (1998). College Physical Chemistry Students’ Conceptions of Equilibrium and Fundamental Thermodynamics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(10), 1151–1160.

Trianto. (2007). Model Pembelajaran Terpadu dalam Teori dan Praktik. Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka.

Turkmen, H. (2006). What Technology Plays Supporting Role in Learning Cycle Approach for Science Education. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 5(2), 71–76.

Zimmerman, C. (2007). The Development of Scientific Thinking Skills in Elementary and Middle School. Developmental Review, 27(2), 172–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2006.12.001.

Zoller, U., & Pushkin, D. (2007). Matching Higher-Order Cognitive Skills (HOCS) Promotion Goals with Problem-Based Laboratory Practice in A Freshman Organic Chemistry Course. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8(2), 153–171.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v5i9.14008

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Wulan Ratia Ratulangi, Endang Budiasih, Anugrah Ricky Wijaya

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

JPtpp is accredited “Rank 3” as a scientific journal under the decree of the Directorate General of Research Enhancement and Development, Ministry of Research, Technology, and Higher Education, dated December 7, 2022, No: 225/E/KPT/2022, effective for five years from Volume 7 Issue 8, 2022 until Volume 12 Issue 7, 2027. Link to download

Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan

Journal of Education: Theory, Research, and Development

Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang

Lisensi Creative Commons

JPtpp is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License