Email this article 
Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing dengan Pendekatan STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics) untuk Pemahaman Konsep dan Keterampilan Argumentasi Siswa SMA pada Materi Laju Reaksi
Abstract
Abstract: Argumentation is an important activity in scientific exploration which has been agreed as a major component in science education. Quality argumentation skills are formed with the understanding of concepts owned by students. The current low level of argumentation skills is caused by the learning process. Application of guided inquiry learning with the STEM approach is expected to provide space to practice arguments based on the results of the constructs of students' concepts during learning. The results of the study stated that differences in initial abilities, the application of guided inquiry with the STEM approach affect the concepts understanding and argumentation skills of students. Also there is no interaction, between models and learning approaches and initial abilities towards understanding concepts and argumentation skills.
Abstrak: Argumentasi merupakan aktivitas penting pada eksplorasi ilmiah yang telah disepakati sebagai komponen utama dalam pendidikan sains. Keterampilan argumentasi yang berkualitas dibentuk dengan modal pemahaman konsep yang dimiliki siswa. Rendahnya keterampilan argumentasi saat ini salah satunya disebabkan oleh proses pembelajaran. Penerapan model pembelajaran inkuiri terbimbing dengan pendekatan STEM diharapkan dapat menyediakan ruang untuk melatih argumentasi berdasarkan hasil konstruk konsep siswa selama pembelajaran. Hasil penelitian menyatakan bahwa perbedaan kemampuan awal, penerapan inkuiri terbimbing dengan pendekatan STEM berpengaruh terhadap pemahaman konsep dan keterampilan argumentasi siswa namun tidak ditemukan adanya interaksi antara model maupun pendekatan pembelajaran dan kemampuan awal terhadap keterampilan argumentasi dan pemahaman konsep.Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abraham, M. R., Williamson, V. M., & Westbrook, S. L. (1994). A Cross-Age Study of the Understanding of Five Chemistry Concepts. Journal of Research and Science Teaching, 147-165.
Adnyana, G. P. (2012). Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis dan Pemahaman Konsep Siswa pada Model Siklus Belajar Hipotesis Deduktif. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran Jilid 45 Nomor 3, 45(3), 201-209.
Alemdar, M. C., Criswell, B. A., & Rushton, G. T. (2018). Evaluation of a Noyce program: Development of Teacher Leaders in STEM Education. Evaluation and Program Planning, 71, 1-11.
Anjarsari, P. (2014). Literasi Sains dalam Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran IPA SMP. Prosiding Semnas Pensa VI "Peran Literasi Sains". Surabaya.
Arikunto, S. (2009). Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Bekiroglu, F., Eskin, H. (2012). Examination of the Relationship between Engagement in Scientific Argumentation and Conceptual Knowledge. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10, 1415-1443
Belland, B. R. (2010). Portraits of Middle School Students Constructing Evidence-based Arguments during Problem-based Learning: The Impact of Computer-based Scaffolds. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(3), 285–309.
Berland, L. K., & Reiser, B. J. (2009). Classroom Communities Adaptations of the Practice of Scientific Argumentation. Science Education, 95(2), 191-216.
Berland, L. K., & Steingut, R. (2016). Explaining Variation in Student Efforts Towards Using Math and Science Knowledge in Engineering Contexts. International Journal of Science Education, 38(18), 2742–2761.
Boesdorfer, S. B. (2017). Is Engineering Inspiring Change in Secondary Chemistry Teachers’ Practices? Journal of Science Teacher Education, 28(7), 609-630.
Boujaoude, S. (2002). Balance of Scientific Literacy Themes in Science Curricula: The Case of Lebanon. International Journal of Science Education, 24(2), 139-156.
Budiarto, I. D. (2015). Pengaruh Pendekatan Perubahan Konseptual dengan Menggunakan Strategi POE Berbantuan Analogi terhadap Pemahaman Konsep Siswa SMA pada Materi Laju Reaksi. Tesis tidak diterbitkan. Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang.
Bybee, R. W. (2010). Advancing STEM Education: A 2020 Vision. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 70(1), 30-35.
Cahyarini, A. (2015). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Learning Cycle 5E Berkonteks Socioscientific Issues (SSI) terhadap Penguasaan Konsep dan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Pada Materi Asam Basa. Tesis tidak diterbitkan. Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang.
Cetin, P. S. (2014). Explicit Argumentation Instruction to Facilitate Conceptual Understanding and Argumentation Skills. Research in Science & Technological Education, 32(1), 1-20.
Chandrasegaran, A. L., Treagust, D. F., & Mocerino, M. (2007). The Development of a Two-Tier Multiple Diagnostic Instrument for Evaluating Secondary School Students' Ability to Describe and Explanain Chemical Reactions Using Multiple Levels of Representation. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8(3), 293-307.
Chang, R., & Overby, J. (2011). General Chemistry the Essential Concepts (Sixth Edition). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Chien, P. L., & Lajium, D. A. (2016). The Effectiveness of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Learning Approach among Secondary School. International Conference on Education and Psychology. Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia: Research Gate.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research (Fourth Edition). Boston: Pearson Education.
Cross, D., Taasoobshirazi, G., Hendricks, S., & Hickey, D. T. (2008). Argumentation: A Strategy for Improving Achievement and Revealing Scientific Identities. International Journal of Science Education, 30(6), 837-861.
Cuevas, P., Lee, O., Hart, J., & Deaktor, R. (2005). Improving Science Inquiry with Elementary Students of Diverse Backgrounds. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 337–357.
Devetak, I., Lorber, E. D., Jurisevic, M., & Glazar, S. A. (2009). Comparing Slovenian Year 8 and Year 9 Elementary School Pupils’ Knowledge of Electrolyte Chemistry and Their Intrinsic Motivation. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 10(4), 281-290.
Devi, N. D., Susanti, E., & Indriyanti, N. Y. (2018). Analisis Kemampuan Argumentasi Siswa SMA pada Materi Larutan Penyangga. Jurnal Kimia dan Pendidikan Kimia, 3(3), 152-159.
Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the Norms of Scientific Argumentation in Clasrooms. Science Education, 84, 287-312.
Duschl, R. A. (2016). Quality Argumentation and Epistemic Criteria. In Erduran, Sibel, Jiménez-Aleixandre, & M. Pilar, Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from (pp. 59-175). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
Effendy. (2002). Upaya untuk Mengatasi Kesalahan Konsep dalam Pembelajaran Kimia dengan Menggunakan Strategi Konflik Kognitif. Media Komunikasi Kimia, 2(6), 1-21.
Effendy. (2016). Ilmu Kimia untuk Siswa SMA dan MA Kelas X. Malang: Indonesian Academic Publishing.
Ercan, S., Bozkurt, A. E., & Tastan, B. (2016). Integrating GIS into Science Classes to Handles STEM Education. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 13, 30-43.
Erduran, S., & Pabuccu, A. (2015). Promoting Argumentation in the Context of Chemistry Stories. In Relevant Chemistry Education-From Theory to Practice (pp. 143-161). Sense Publisher.
Erduran, S., Simone, S., & Osborne, J. (2004). Tapping into Argumentation: Developments in the Application of Toulmin's Argument Pattern for Studying Science Discourse. Wiley Periodicals, 88(6), 915-933.
Farida, I., & Gusniarti, W. F. (2014). Profil Keterampilan Argumentasi Siswa Pada Konsep Koloid yang Dikembangkan melalui Pembelajaran Inkuiri Argumentatif. EDUSAINS, 6(1), 32-40.
Firman, H. (2016). Pendidikan STEM sebagai Kerangka Inovasi Pembelajaran Kimia untuk Meningkatkan Daya Saing Bangsa dalam Era Masyarakat Ekonomi ASEAN. Seminar Nasional dan Pembelajarannya (pp. 1-6). Jurusan Kimia FMIPA Universitas Negeri Surabaya.
Gabel, D. L., Samuel, K. V., & Hunn, D. (1994). Research on Problem Solving: Chemistry. Handbook of Research on Science Teaching and Learning , 301-326.
Ginanjar, W. S., Utari, S., & Muslim. (2015). Penerapan Model Argument-Driven Inquiry dalam Pembelajaran IPA untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Argumentasi Ilmiah Siswa SMP. Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA, 20(1), 32-37.
Gucluer, E. (2012). The Effect of Using Activities Improving Scientific Literacy on Students' Achievement in Science and Technology Lesson. International Online Journal of Primary Education, 1(1), 8-13.
Guzey, S. S., Moore, T. J., Harwell, M., & Moreno, M. (2016). STEM Integration in Middle School Life Science: Student Learning and Attitudes. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(4), 550-560.
Hanson, D. M. 2006. Instructor’s Guide to Process-Oriented Guided-Inquiry Learning. Stony Brook University – SUNY: Pacific Rest 2nd Edition.
Harlen, W., & Qualter, A. (2004). The Teaching of Science in Primary Schools. Great Britain: David Fulton Publisher.
Hathcoc, S., & Dickerson, D. (2014). Scaffolding for Creative Product Possibilities in a Design-Based STEM Activity. Research Science Education, 45(5), 1-22.
Herawati, R. F., Mulyani, S., & Redjeki, T. (2013). Pembelajaran Kimia Berbasis Multiple Representasi ditinjau dari Kemampuan Awal Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Laju Reaksi Siswa SMA Negeri I Karanganyar. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 2(2), 38-43.
Hofstein, A., Eilks, I., & Bybee, R. (2011). Societal Issues and Their Importance for Contemporary Science Education a Pedagogical Justification and the State-of-the-Art in Israel, Germany, and the USA. International Journal of Science and Matmhematics Education, 1459-1483.
Holme, T., Luxford, C. J., & Brandriet, A. (2015). Defining Conceptual Understanding in General Chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 1477-1483.
Iskandar, S. M. (2011). Pendekatan Pembelajaran Sains berbasis Konstruktivis. Malang: Bayumedia Publishing.
Kang , J., & Keinonen, T. (2017). The Effect of Student-Centered Approaches on Students Interest and Achievement in Science: Relevant Topic-Based, Open and Guided Inquiry-Based,and Discussion-Based Approaches. Research Science Education.
Kang, N. H. (2019). A Review of The Effect of Integrated STEM or STEAM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, and Mathematics) Education in South Korea. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 5(6), 1-22.
Katchevich, D., Hofstein, A., & Mamlok, R. (2011). Argumentation in the Chemistry Laboratory: Inquiry and Confirmatory Experiments. Research in Science Education, 43(1).
Kelley, T., & Knowless, J. G. (2016). A Conceptual Framework for Integrated STEM Education. International of STEM Education, 3(11).
Kemendikbud. (2017). Model Silabus Mata Pelajaran Sekolah Menengah Atas/Madrasah Aliyah (SMA/MA). Jakarta.
King, D. (2012). New Perspectives on Context-Based Chemistry Education: Using Dialectical Sociocultural Approach to View Teaching and Learning. Studies in Science Education, 48(1), 51-87.
Kock, Z. J., & Gravemeijer, K. (2015). Creating a Culture of Inquiry in the Classroom while Fostering an Understanding of Theoritical Concepts in Direct Current Electric Circuits: A Balanced Approach. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13, 45-69.
Koksal, E., & Berberoglu, G. (2012). The Effect of Guided-inquiry Instruction on 6th Grade Turkish Students’ Achievement. Science Process Skills, and Attitudes Toward Science. International Journal of Science Education, 36(1), 66–78.
Kolomuc, A., & Tekin, S. (2011). Chemistry Teachers' Misconceptions Concerning Concept of Chemical Reaction Rate. Eurasioan Journal of Physics and Chemistry Education, 3(2), 84-101.
Kuhn, D. (1993). Science as Argument: Implications for Teaching and Learning Scientific Thingking. Science Education, 77(3), 319-337.
Kuhn, D., & Udell, W. (2007). Coordinating Own and Other Perspective in Argument. Thingking and Reasoning, 13(2), 90-104.
Kurt, S., & Ayas, A. (2012). Improving Students' Understanding and Explaining Real Life Problems on Concepts of Reaction Rate by Using A Four Step Constructivist Approach. Energy Education Science and Technology Part B: Social and Educational Studies, 4(2), 979-992.
Lang, H. R., & Evan, D. N. (2006). Model, Strategies, and Methods for Effective Teaching. Boston: Pearson Education.
Lederman, N. G., Lederman, J. S., & Antink, A. (2013). Nature of Science and Scientific Inquiry as Contexts for the Learning of Science and Achievement of Scientific Literacy. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science, Technology, 138-147.
Lin, Y.-R., & Hung, J.-F. (2016). The Analysis and Reconciliation of Students’ Rebuttals in Argumentation Activities. International Journal of Science Education, 38(1), 130-155.
Liu, H.-C., Andre, T., & Greenbowe, T. (2008). The Impact of Learner's Prior Knowledge on Their Use of Chemistry Computer Simulations: A Case Study. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(5), 466-482.
Liu, Q.-T., Liu, B.-W., & Lin, Y.-R. (2018). The Influence of Prior Knowledge and Collaborative Online Learning Environment on Students Argumentations in Descriptive and Theoretical Scientific Concept. International Journal of Science Education, 41(2), 165-187.
Miller, J. D. (1983). Scientific Literacy: A Conceptual and Empirical Review. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Musya'idah, Effendy, & Santoso, A. (2016). POGIL, Analogi Model FAR, KBI dan Laju Reaksi. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan IPA Pascasarjana UM, (pp. 671-680). Malang.
Nakhleh, M. B. (1992). Why Some Students Don't Learn Chemistry: Chemical Misconceptions. Journal of Chemical Education, 69(3), 191-195.
National Research Council. (2012). A Frame Work for K-12 Science Education Practices, Crosscutting Concept, and Core Ideas. United States of America: National Academy of Sciences.
Ngertini, N., Sadia, W., & Yudana, M. (2013). Pengaruh Implementasi Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing Terhadap Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep dan Literasi Sains Siswa Kelas X SMA PGRI 1 Amlapura. e-Journal Program Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, 4, 1-11.
Norris, S., Phillips, L., & Osborne, J.(2007). Scientific Inquiry: The Place of Interpretation and Argumentation. In I. J. Luft, & J. Gess, Science as Inquiry in Secondary Setting. Arlington: VA: NSTA Press.
Nugraheni, N. C., & Paidi. (2017). Kemampuan Literasi Sains Kelas X SMA Negeri Mata Pelajaran Biologi Berdasarkan Topografi Wilayah Gunungkidul. Jurnal Prodi Pendidikan Biologi, 6(5), 261-270.
Nurabaya, C. B. (2019). Perubahan Konseptual dan Literasi Saintifik melalui Pembelajaran Berbasis Inkuiri dalam Program STEM pada Materi Fluida Dinamis di SMA Negeri 9 Malang. Tesis tidak diterbitkan. Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang.
Odja, A. H., & Payu, C. S. (2014). Analisis Kemampuan Awal Literasi Sains Siswa pada Konsep IPA. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Kimi, ISBN: 978-602-0951-00-3. Surabaya: Jurusan Kimia FMIPA Universitas Negeri Surabaya.
Ogan-Bekiroglu, F., & Eskin, H. (2012). Examination of The Relationship between Engagement in Scientific Argumentation and Conceptual Knowledge. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(6), 1415-1443.
Osborne, J. F., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing the Quality of Argumentation in School Science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 994–1020.
Pakpahan, R. (2016). Faktor-faktor yang Memengaruhi Capaian Literasi Matematika Siswa dalam PISA 2012. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 1(3), 331-347. https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v1i3.496
Pedaste, M., Maeouts, M., Siiman, L. A., de Jong, T., & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of Inquiry-Based Learning: Definitions and the Inquiry Cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003
Permanasari, A. (2016). STEM Education: Inovasi dalam Pembelajaran Sains. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Sains. Surakarta: SNPS Universitas Sebelas Maret.
Pratiwi, Y. N. (2015). Pengaruh Pembelajaran Kimia dalam Konteks Socioscientific Issue (SSI) terhadap Keterampilan Berargumentasi, Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis, dan Penguasaan Konsep Laju Reaksi Siswa Kelas XI SMA. Tesis tidak diterbitkan. Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang.
Puspitasari, I. D., & Permanasari, A. (2012). Analisis Pemahaman Konsep dan Kesulitan Mahasiswa untuk Pengembangan Program Perkuliahan Dasar-dasar Kimia Analitik Berbasis Problem Solving. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 98-101.
Rahayu, S. (2014). Menuju Masyarakat Berliterasi Sains: Harapan dan Tantangan Kurikulum 2013 . Prosiding Seminar Nasional Kimia dan Pembelajarannya (SNKP) (pp. 27-39). Malang: Jurusan Kimia FMIPA Universitas Negeri Malang.
Rahayu, S. (2017). Mengoptimalkan Aspek Literasi dalam Pembelajaran Kimia Abad 21. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Kimia UNY. Yogyakarta.
Reeve, E. M. (2015). Science, Technology, Engineering & Mathematics (STEM) Education is Here to Stay. Thailand STEM Festival. Thailand: International Technology and Engineering Educators Association.
Rizkiana, F., Dasna, I. W., & Marfu'ah, S. (2016). Pengaruh Praktikum dan Demonstrasi dalam Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing terhadap Motivasi Belajar Siswa pada Materi Asam Basa Ditinjau dari Kemampuan Awal. Jurnal Pendidikan Volume 1 Nomor 3, 354-362.
Rusmayanti, M. I. (2018). Pengaruh Strategi Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing dengan Pendekatan SETS (Science, Environtment, Technology, and Society) terhadap Keterampilan Proses Sains dan Scientific Argumentation pada Materi Laju Reaksi. Tesis tidak ditebitkan. Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang.
Sadeh, I., & Zion, M. (2012). Which Type of Inquiry Project Do High School Biology Students Prefer: Open or Guided? Research in Science Education, 42, 831–848.
Sadler, T. D. (2006). Promoting Discourse and Argumentation in Science Teacher Education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 17, 323–346.
Sampson, V., & Gerbino, F. (2010). Two Instructional Models That Teachers Can Use to Promote and Support Scientific Argumentation in the Biology Classroom. The American Biology Teacher, 427-431.
Sampurno, P. J., Sari, Y. A., & Wijaya, A. D. (2015). Integrating STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematcis) and Disaster (STEM-D) Education for Building Students' Disaster Literacy. International Journal of Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 73-76.
Septiyani, N. R. (2018). Implementasi Pendekatan Pembelajaran STEM untuk Meningkatkan Skill Argumentasi pada Siswa SMA. Bandar Lampung: Universitas Lampung.
Shahali, E. H., Halim, L., Rasul, M. S., Osman, K., & Zulkifeli, M. A. (2017). STEM Learning through Enginering Design: Impact on Middle Secondary Students' Interest Towards STEM. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(5), 1189-1211.
Siekmann, G. (2016). What is STEM? The Need for Unpacking its Definitions and Applications. National Centre for Vocational Educational Research.
Siswanto, Kaniawati, I., & Suhandi, A. (2014). Implementation of Generate Argument Instructional Model Using Scientific Method to Increase the Cognitive Abilities and Argumentation Skills of Senior High School Students. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 10(2), 104-116.
Slavin, R. E. (2008). Cooperative Learning, Succes for All, and Evidence-based Reform in Education. Education et Didacti, 2(2), 149-157.
Stohlmann, M., Moore, T. J., & Roehrig, G. H. (2012). Considerations for Teaching Integrated STEM Education. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 2(1), 28-34.
Subekti, Y. (2018). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI) Berbasis Konteks terhadap Keterampilan Argumentasi dan Pemahaman Konsep Siswa pada Materi Termokimia. Tesis tidak diterbitkan. Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang.
Sudjana, N. (2006). Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar (Cetakan Kesebelas). Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Sumantri, M., & Permana, J. (2001). Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: CV. Maulana.
Supasorn, S., & Promarak, V. (2015). Implementation of 5E Inquiry Incorporated with Analogy Learning Approach to Enchance Conceptual Understanding of Chemical Reaction Rate for Grade 11 Students. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16(1), 121-132.
Sutarto, H. (2018). Lingkungan dalam Pembelajaran dan Pengajaran Matematika yang Memunculkan 4C Ability sebagai Penyiapan SDM Unggul di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. Semarang: Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika 2018.
Tahir, S., & Anwar, S. (2018). How to Develop Student Creativity Through Teaching Materials of Reaction Rate STEM-Based? International Conference on Mathematics and Science Education of Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, 3, 384-388.
Talanquer, V. 2010. Macro, Submicro, and Symbolic: The Many Faces of the Chemistry "Triplet". International Journal of Science Education, 33(2), 179-195.
Thien, L. M., Darmawan, I. N., & Ong, M. Y. (2015). Affective Characteristics and Mathematics Performance in Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thailand: What Can PISA 2012 data Tell Us? Large-scale Assesments in Education.
Tseng, C.-H., Tuan, H.-L., & Chin, C. C. (2013). How to Help Teachers Develop Inquiry Teaching: Perspectives from Experienced Science Teachers. Research Science Education, 43(2), 809–825.
Tytler, R., Prain, V., & Hobbs, L. (2019). Rethinking Disciplinary Links in Interdisciplinary STEM Learning: A Temporal Model. Research in Science Education.
Uswatun, D. A., & Rohaeti, E. (2015). Perangkat Pembelajaran IPA Berbasis Inkuiri untuk Meningkatkan Critical Thinking dan Scientific Attitude Siswa. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 1(2), 138-152. https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v1i2.7498
Von, A. C., Erduran, S., & Osborne, J. (2007). Arguing to Learn and Learning to Argue: Case Studies of How Students Argumentation Relates to Their Scientific Knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(1), 101-131.
Wahdan, W. Z., Sulistina, O., & Sukarianingsih, D. (2017). Analisis Kemampuan Berargumentasi Ilmiah Materi Ikatan Kimia Peserta Didik SMA, MAN, dan Perguruan Tinggi Tingkat I. Jurnal Pembelajaran Kimia, 2(2), 30-40.
Wahyuni, G. (2019). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Learning Cycle 5E (LC 5E) dengan Analogi terhadap Pemahaman Konsep dan Keterampilan Argumentasi Ilmiah Siswa pada Pokok Bahasan Laju Reaksi. Tesis tidak diterbitkan, Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang.
Wang, J., & Buck, G. A. (2016). Understanding a High School Physics Teacher’s Pedagogical Content Knowledge of Argumentation. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 27(5), 577-604.
Wenning, C. J. (2005). Levels of Inquiry: Hirerarchies of Pedagogical Practices and Inquiry Process. Journal of Physics Teacher Education Online, 2(3), 3-11.
Widayoko, A. (2018). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Fisika SMA Terintegrasi STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematichs) untuk Meningkatkan Literasi Saintifik Siswa pada Materi Impuls dan Momentum. Tesis tidak diterbitkan. Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang.
Yu, W. F., She, H. C., & Lee, Y. M. (2010). The Effects of a Web-based/non Web-based Problem Solving Instruction and High/low Achievement on Students’ Problem Solving Ability and Biology Achievement. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 47(2), 187–199.
Yuliana, A. S. (2019). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Berbasis Learning Cycle 7E-STEM untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Siswa pada Materi Suhu dan Kalor. Tesis tidak diterbitkan. Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang.
Yuliati, Y. (2017). Literasi Sains dalam Pembelajaran IPA. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan Dasar, 3(2), 21-28.
Zacharia, Z. (2003). Belief, Attitudes, and Intentions of Science Teachers Regarding the Educational Use of Computer Simulations and Inquiry-based Experiments in Physic. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(8), 792–823.
Zohar, A., & Dori, Y. (2003). Higher Order Thinking Skills and Low Achieving Students: Are they Mutually Exclusive? The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(2), 145–181.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v5i11.14189
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Astrid Kinantya Paramita, Yahmin Yahmin, I Wayan Dasna
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan Journal of Education: Theory, Research, and Development Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang
|
