Pengembangan Program Resitasi Materi Listrik Statis untuk Siswa SMA

Mafida Hermawati, Arif Hidayat, Sutopo Sutopo

Abstract


Abstract: This research aims to develop recitation program topic static electricity for high school student designed with a computer offline program that is microsoft office power point 2007. Using ADDIE models, this research produce recitation program with three packages program. This product verified to materials expert, media expert, and audience/high school student. Based on the verification and test obtained percentage of eligibility aspects is 95%, feasibility aspects 87,5%, and recitation program readability aspects 86,86% that means recitation program topic static electricity for high school student are feasible to be used and disseminated.

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menghasilkan produk program resitasi materi listrik statis untuk siswa SMA yang dirancang menggunakan program komputer offline yaitu microsoft office power point 2007. Metode pengembangan yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode ADDIE. Secara umum program resitasi yang dihasilkan terdiri dari tiga paket program. Produk tersebut selanjutnya diujicobakan kepada ahli materi, ahli media dan pengguna/siswa SMA. Berdasarkan uji coba tersebut diperoleh persentase aspek kelayakan isi sebesar 95%, aspek kelayakan penyajian sebesar 87,50%, dan aspek keterbacaan program resitasi sebesar 86,86% yang berarti program resitasi materi listrik statis untuk siswa SMA ini layak untuk digunakan dan disebarluaskan.

Keywords


recitation program; static electricity; high school student; program resitasi; listrik statis; siswa SMA

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anta, T. (2017). Analisis Pemahaman Konsep Siswa pada Materi Suhu dan Kalor Menggunakan Discovery Learning disertai Contrasting Case. Tesis tidak diterbitkan. Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang.

Arief, Y. (2017). Pemahaman Konseptual Peserta Didik SMA Negeri 4 Bangkalan melalui Program Resitasi pada Materi Gerak Harmonik Sederhana. Tesis tidak diterbitkan. Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang.

Arends, R. (2013). Belajar untuk Mengajar Edisi 9 Buku 2, Penerjemah Made Frida Yulia. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Bahri, S. J. & Azwan Zain. (2012). Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Bellanca, J. (2012). Proyek Pembelajaran yang Diperkaya: Jalur Praktis Menuju Ketrampilan ke Abad ke-21. Jakarta Barat: PT. Indeks.

Cui, L., Sanjay, N., Rebello, Fletcher, P. R., & Bennet, A. G. (2006). Transfer of Learning from Colledge Calculus to Physics Courses. Proceedings of the NARST 2006 Annual Meeting. San Fransisco, CA, United States.

Cohen, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education. New York: Routledge.

Demiral, M. & Turan, B. A. (2010). The Effect of Problem Based Learning on Achievement, Attitude, Metacognitive Awareness and Motivation. Hacettepe Journal of Education, 38, 55—66.

Gonen, S. & Basaran, B. (2008). The New Method of Problem Solving in Physics Education by Using Scorm-Compliant Content Package. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education (TOJDE), 9(3), 112 – 120.

Hmelo, C., Horton, D. & Kolodner, J. (2000). Designing to Learn in Complex Systems. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(3), 247—298.

Ibrahim, B., & Robello, N. S. (2012). Representation Task Format and Problem Solving Strategies in Kinematics and Work. Physics Review Special Topic-Physics Education Research. 8, 010126.

Julian, R., & Kirsten, B. (2016). Effects of Comparing Contrasting Cases and Inventing on Learning from Subsequent Instructional Explanations. Instructional Science, 44(2), 147—176.

Kortemeyer, G. (2014). An Empirical Study of the Effect of Granting Multiple Tris for Online Homework. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research.

Krustusch, M. B. (2016). Assessing the Impact of Representational and Contextual Problem Features on Student Use of Right-Hand Rules. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research. 12, 010102.

Kuo, E., & Carl, R. W. (2016). Toward Instructional Design Principles: Inducing Faraday’s Law with Contrasting Case. USA: American Physical Society.

Li, L. M., Li, B. & Luo, Y. (2015). Using a Dual Safeguard Web-Based Interactive Teaching Approach in a Introductory Physics Class. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 11 (010106), 1—12.

Luangrath, P., Pettersson S., Benckert, S. (2011). On the Use of Two Versions of the Force Concept Inventory to Test Conceptual Understanding of Mechanics in Lao PDR. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 7(2), 103-114.

Maloney, et al. (2001). Surveying Students’ Conceptual Knowledge of Electricity and Magnetism. American Journal of Physics, 69(7), 13—23.

Masek, A., & Yasmin, S. (2011). The Effect of Problem Based Learning on Critical Thinking ability. A Theoretical and Empirical Review. International Review of Social Sciences and Humanities, 2(1), 215—221.

Meltzer, D. E. (2006). Analysis of Shifts In Students’ Reasoning Regarding Electric Field and Potential Concepts. Physics Education Research Conference Proceeding h. 177 – 180. Seattle: American Institute of Physics.

Muhamad, Y. & Wawan, S. (2009). Studi Kompetensi Multirepresentasi Mahasiswa pada Topik Elektrostatika. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi, 2(1).

Ryan, Q. W., Frodermann, E., Heller, K., Hsu, L., & Mason, A. (2016). Computer Problem-Solving Coaches for Introductory Physics: Design and Usability Studies. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research. 12. 010105.

Sharifah, R., & Faaizah, S. (2015). The Development of Online Project Based Collaborative Learning Using ADDIE Model. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 1803—1812. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.392.

Schwartz, D. L., C. C. Chase, M. A. Oppezzo, & D. B. Chin. (2011). Practicing Versus Inventing with Contrasting Case: The Effect of Telling First on Learning and Transfer. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(4), 759—775. DOI:10.1037/a0025140

Shemwell, J. T., C. C. Chase & D. L. Schwartz. (2015). Seeking the General Explanation: A Test of Inductive Activities for Learning and Transfer. Journal of Research Science Teaching, 52(1), 58-83.

Sutopo. (2013). Improving Students’ Representational and Generic Skill Using Representational Approach. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 19(1), 7—16.

Taqwa, M. (2017). Program Resitasi Berbasis Multi Representasi dan Multi Konteks untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep Mekanika Newtonan. Tesis tidak diterbitkan. Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang.

Yerushalmi, E., Cohen, E., Mason, A., & Singh, C. (2012). What do Students do When Asked to Diagnose their Mistakes? Does it Help them? I. An Typical Quiz Context. Physical Review Special Topics Physics Education Research, 8, 020109.

Yoesoef, M. (2015). Penerapan Model Problem Based Learning untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Menanya dan Penguasaan Konsep Fisika Kelas X MIA 1 SMA Negeri Kediri. Jurnal PINUS, 1(2), 77—89.

Young, H. D., & Freedman. (2003). Sears & Zemansky: Fisika Universitas Edisi Kesepuluh Jilid 2. Alih Bahasa oleh Pantur Silaban. Jakarta: Erlangga.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v6i1.14392

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Mafida Hermawati, Arif Hidayat, Sutopo Sutopo

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

JPtpp is accredited “Rank 3” as a scientific journal under the decree of the Directorate General of Research Enhancement and Development, Ministry of Research, Technology, and Higher Education, dated December 7, 2022, No: 225/E/KPT/2022, effective for five years from Volume 7 Issue 8, 2022 until Volume 12 Issue 7, 2027. Link to download

Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan

Journal of Education: Theory, Research, and Development

Graduate School Of Universitas Negeri Malang

Lisensi Creative Commons

JPtpp is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License